Cargando…

Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?

Older people often suffer from multiple diseases. Therefore, universal cross-disease outcomes (e.g. functional status, quality of life, overall survival) are more relevant than disease-specific outcomes, and a range of potential outcomes are needed for medical decision-making. To assess how patient-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blom, Jeanet W., El Azzi, Maya, Wopereis, Daisy M., Glynn, Liam, Muth, Christiane, van Driel, Mieke L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9
_version_ 1782376013914701824
author Blom, Jeanet W.
El Azzi, Maya
Wopereis, Daisy M.
Glynn, Liam
Muth, Christiane
van Driel, Mieke L.
author_facet Blom, Jeanet W.
El Azzi, Maya
Wopereis, Daisy M.
Glynn, Liam
Muth, Christiane
van Driel, Mieke L.
author_sort Blom, Jeanet W.
collection PubMed
description Older people often suffer from multiple diseases. Therefore, universal cross-disease outcomes (e.g. functional status, quality of life, overall survival) are more relevant than disease-specific outcomes, and a range of potential outcomes are needed for medical decision-making. To assess how patient-relevant outcomes have penetrated randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reporting of these outcomes was reviewed in heart failure trials that included patients with multimorbidity. We systematically reviewed RCTs (Jan 2011–June 2012) and evaluated reported outcomes. Heart failure was chosen as condition of interest as this is common among older patients with multimorbidity. The main outcome was the proportion of RCTs reporting all-cause mortality, all-cause hospital admission, and outcomes in four domains of health, i.e. functional, signs and symptoms, psychological, and social domains. Of the 106 included RCTs, 50 (47 %) reported all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and 29 (27 %) reported all-cause hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization. Of all trials, 68 (64 %) measured outcomes in the functional domain, 80 (75 %) in the domain of signs and symptoms, 65 (61 %) in the psychological domain, and 59 (56 %) in the social domain. Disease-specific instruments were more often used than non-disease-specific instruments. This review shows increasing attention for more patient-relevant outcomes; this is promising and indicates more awareness of the importance of a variety of outcomes desirable for patients. However, patients’ individual goal attainments were universally absent. For continued progress in patient-centred care, efforts are needed to develop these outcomes, study their merits and pitfalls, and intensify their use in research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4464642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44646422015-06-17 Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored? Blom, Jeanet W. El Azzi, Maya Wopereis, Daisy M. Glynn, Liam Muth, Christiane van Driel, Mieke L. Heart Fail Rev Article Older people often suffer from multiple diseases. Therefore, universal cross-disease outcomes (e.g. functional status, quality of life, overall survival) are more relevant than disease-specific outcomes, and a range of potential outcomes are needed for medical decision-making. To assess how patient-relevant outcomes have penetrated randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reporting of these outcomes was reviewed in heart failure trials that included patients with multimorbidity. We systematically reviewed RCTs (Jan 2011–June 2012) and evaluated reported outcomes. Heart failure was chosen as condition of interest as this is common among older patients with multimorbidity. The main outcome was the proportion of RCTs reporting all-cause mortality, all-cause hospital admission, and outcomes in four domains of health, i.e. functional, signs and symptoms, psychological, and social domains. Of the 106 included RCTs, 50 (47 %) reported all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and 29 (27 %) reported all-cause hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization. Of all trials, 68 (64 %) measured outcomes in the functional domain, 80 (75 %) in the domain of signs and symptoms, 65 (61 %) in the psychological domain, and 59 (56 %) in the social domain. Disease-specific instruments were more often used than non-disease-specific instruments. This review shows increasing attention for more patient-relevant outcomes; this is promising and indicates more awareness of the importance of a variety of outcomes desirable for patients. However, patients’ individual goal attainments were universally absent. For continued progress in patient-centred care, efforts are needed to develop these outcomes, study their merits and pitfalls, and intensify their use in research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2015-02-18 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4464642/ /pubmed/25690985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Blom, Jeanet W.
El Azzi, Maya
Wopereis, Daisy M.
Glynn, Liam
Muth, Christiane
van Driel, Mieke L.
Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?
title Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?
title_full Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?
title_fullStr Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?
title_full_unstemmed Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?
title_short Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?
title_sort reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9
work_keys_str_mv AT blomjeanetw reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored
AT elazzimaya reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored
AT wopereisdaisym reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored
AT glynnliam reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored
AT muthchristiane reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored
AT vandrielmiekel reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored