Cargando…
Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored?
Older people often suffer from multiple diseases. Therefore, universal cross-disease outcomes (e.g. functional status, quality of life, overall survival) are more relevant than disease-specific outcomes, and a range of potential outcomes are needed for medical decision-making. To assess how patient-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9 |
_version_ | 1782376013914701824 |
---|---|
author | Blom, Jeanet W. El Azzi, Maya Wopereis, Daisy M. Glynn, Liam Muth, Christiane van Driel, Mieke L. |
author_facet | Blom, Jeanet W. El Azzi, Maya Wopereis, Daisy M. Glynn, Liam Muth, Christiane van Driel, Mieke L. |
author_sort | Blom, Jeanet W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Older people often suffer from multiple diseases. Therefore, universal cross-disease outcomes (e.g. functional status, quality of life, overall survival) are more relevant than disease-specific outcomes, and a range of potential outcomes are needed for medical decision-making. To assess how patient-relevant outcomes have penetrated randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reporting of these outcomes was reviewed in heart failure trials that included patients with multimorbidity. We systematically reviewed RCTs (Jan 2011–June 2012) and evaluated reported outcomes. Heart failure was chosen as condition of interest as this is common among older patients with multimorbidity. The main outcome was the proportion of RCTs reporting all-cause mortality, all-cause hospital admission, and outcomes in four domains of health, i.e. functional, signs and symptoms, psychological, and social domains. Of the 106 included RCTs, 50 (47 %) reported all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and 29 (27 %) reported all-cause hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization. Of all trials, 68 (64 %) measured outcomes in the functional domain, 80 (75 %) in the domain of signs and symptoms, 65 (61 %) in the psychological domain, and 59 (56 %) in the social domain. Disease-specific instruments were more often used than non-disease-specific instruments. This review shows increasing attention for more patient-relevant outcomes; this is promising and indicates more awareness of the importance of a variety of outcomes desirable for patients. However, patients’ individual goal attainments were universally absent. For continued progress in patient-centred care, efforts are needed to develop these outcomes, study their merits and pitfalls, and intensify their use in research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4464642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44646422015-06-17 Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored? Blom, Jeanet W. El Azzi, Maya Wopereis, Daisy M. Glynn, Liam Muth, Christiane van Driel, Mieke L. Heart Fail Rev Article Older people often suffer from multiple diseases. Therefore, universal cross-disease outcomes (e.g. functional status, quality of life, overall survival) are more relevant than disease-specific outcomes, and a range of potential outcomes are needed for medical decision-making. To assess how patient-relevant outcomes have penetrated randomized controlled trials (RCTs), reporting of these outcomes was reviewed in heart failure trials that included patients with multimorbidity. We systematically reviewed RCTs (Jan 2011–June 2012) and evaluated reported outcomes. Heart failure was chosen as condition of interest as this is common among older patients with multimorbidity. The main outcome was the proportion of RCTs reporting all-cause mortality, all-cause hospital admission, and outcomes in four domains of health, i.e. functional, signs and symptoms, psychological, and social domains. Of the 106 included RCTs, 50 (47 %) reported all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality and 29 (27 %) reported all-cause hospitalization and cardiovascular hospitalization. Of all trials, 68 (64 %) measured outcomes in the functional domain, 80 (75 %) in the domain of signs and symptoms, 65 (61 %) in the psychological domain, and 59 (56 %) in the social domain. Disease-specific instruments were more often used than non-disease-specific instruments. This review shows increasing attention for more patient-relevant outcomes; this is promising and indicates more awareness of the importance of a variety of outcomes desirable for patients. However, patients’ individual goal attainments were universally absent. For continued progress in patient-centred care, efforts are needed to develop these outcomes, study their merits and pitfalls, and intensify their use in research. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2015-02-18 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4464642/ /pubmed/25690985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Blom, Jeanet W. El Azzi, Maya Wopereis, Daisy M. Glynn, Liam Muth, Christiane van Driel, Mieke L. Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored? |
title | Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored? |
title_full | Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored? |
title_fullStr | Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored? |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored? |
title_short | Reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored? |
title_sort | reporting of patient-centred outcomes in heart failure trials: are patient preferences being ignored? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25690985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-015-9476-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blomjeanetw reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored AT elazzimaya reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored AT wopereisdaisym reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored AT glynnliam reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored AT muthchristiane reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored AT vandrielmiekel reportingofpatientcentredoutcomesinheartfailuretrialsarepatientpreferencesbeingignored |