Cargando…

Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

In individuals with multiple sclerosis, physical and cognitive disability progression are clinical and pathophysiological hallmarks of the disease. Despite shortcomings, particularly in capturing cognitive deficits, the Expanded Disability Status Scale is the assessment of disability progression mos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiendl, Heinz, Meuth, Sven G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-015-0411-0
_version_ 1782376030777901056
author Wiendl, Heinz
Meuth, Sven G.
author_facet Wiendl, Heinz
Meuth, Sven G.
author_sort Wiendl, Heinz
collection PubMed
description In individuals with multiple sclerosis, physical and cognitive disability progression are clinical and pathophysiological hallmarks of the disease. Despite shortcomings, particularly in capturing cognitive deficits, the Expanded Disability Status Scale is the assessment of disability progression most widely used in clinical trials. Here, we review treatment effects on disability that have been reported in large clinical trials of disease-modifying treatment, both among patients with relapsing–remitting disease and among those with progressive disease. However, direct comparisons are confounded to some degree by the lack of consistency in assessment of disability progression across trials. Confirmed disability progression (CDP) is a more robust measure when performed over a 6-month than a 3-month interval, and reduction in the risk of 6-month CDP in phase III trials provides good evidence for the beneficial effects on disability of several high-efficacy treatments for relapsing–remitting disease. It is also becoming increasingly clear that therapies effective in relapsing–remitting disease have little impact on the course of progressive disease. Given that the pathophysiological mechanisms, which lead to the long-term accrual of physical and cognitive deficits, are evident at the earliest stages of disease, it remains a matter of debate whether the most effective therapies are administered early enough to afford patients the best long-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4464731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44647312015-06-17 Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Wiendl, Heinz Meuth, Sven G. Drugs Leading Article In individuals with multiple sclerosis, physical and cognitive disability progression are clinical and pathophysiological hallmarks of the disease. Despite shortcomings, particularly in capturing cognitive deficits, the Expanded Disability Status Scale is the assessment of disability progression most widely used in clinical trials. Here, we review treatment effects on disability that have been reported in large clinical trials of disease-modifying treatment, both among patients with relapsing–remitting disease and among those with progressive disease. However, direct comparisons are confounded to some degree by the lack of consistency in assessment of disability progression across trials. Confirmed disability progression (CDP) is a more robust measure when performed over a 6-month than a 3-month interval, and reduction in the risk of 6-month CDP in phase III trials provides good evidence for the beneficial effects on disability of several high-efficacy treatments for relapsing–remitting disease. It is also becoming increasingly clear that therapies effective in relapsing–remitting disease have little impact on the course of progressive disease. Given that the pathophysiological mechanisms, which lead to the long-term accrual of physical and cognitive deficits, are evident at the earliest stages of disease, it remains a matter of debate whether the most effective therapies are administered early enough to afford patients the best long-term outcomes. Springer International Publishing 2015-06-02 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4464731/ /pubmed/26033077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-015-0411-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Leading Article
Wiendl, Heinz
Meuth, Sven G.
Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_full Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_short Pharmacological Approaches to Delaying Disability Progression in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort pharmacological approaches to delaying disability progression in patients with multiple sclerosis
topic Leading Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40265-015-0411-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wiendlheinz pharmacologicalapproachestodelayingdisabilityprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT meuthsveng pharmacologicalapproachestodelayingdisabilityprogressioninpatientswithmultiplesclerosis