Cargando…

Radiation therapy improves survival in rectal small cell cancer - Analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data

BACKGROUND: Small cell carcinoma of the rectum is a rare neoplasm with scant literature to guide treatment. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of this cancer. METHODS: The SEER database (National Cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Modrek, Aram S, Hsu, Howard C, Leichman, Cynthia G, Du, Kevin L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25902707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0411-y
_version_ 1782376042882662400
author Modrek, Aram S
Hsu, Howard C
Leichman, Cynthia G
Du, Kevin L
author_facet Modrek, Aram S
Hsu, Howard C
Leichman, Cynthia G
Du, Kevin L
author_sort Modrek, Aram S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Small cell carcinoma of the rectum is a rare neoplasm with scant literature to guide treatment. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of this cancer. METHODS: The SEER database (National Cancer Institute) was queried for locoregional cases of small cell rectal cancer. Years of diagnosis were limited to 1988–2010 (most recent available) to reduce variability in staging criteria or longitudinal changes in surgery and radiation techniques. Two month conditional survival was applied to minimize bias by excluding patients who did not survive long enough to receive cancer-directed therapy. Patient demographics between the RT and No_RT groups were compared using Pearson Chi-Square tests. Overall survival was compared between patients who received radiotherapy (RT, n = 43) and those who did not (No_RT, n = 28) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate important covariates. RESULTS: Median survival was significantly longer for patients who received radiation compared to those who were not treated with radiation; 26 mo vs. 8 mo, respectively (log-rank P = 0.009). We also noted a higher 1-year overall survival rate for those who received radiation (71.1% vs. 37.8%). Unadjusted hazard ratio for death (HR) was 0.495 with the use of radiation (95% CI 0.286-0.858). Among surgery, radiotherapy, sex and age at diagnosis, radiation therapy was the only significant factor for overall survival with a multivariate HR for death of 0.393 (95% CI 0.206-0.750, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Using SEER data, we have identified a significant survival advantage with the use of radiation therapy in the setting of rectal small cell carcinoma. Limitations of the SEER data apply to this study, particularly the lack of information on chemotherapy usage. Our findings strongly support the use of radiation therapy for patients with locoregional small cell rectal cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4464878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44648782015-06-14 Radiation therapy improves survival in rectal small cell cancer - Analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data Modrek, Aram S Hsu, Howard C Leichman, Cynthia G Du, Kevin L Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Small cell carcinoma of the rectum is a rare neoplasm with scant literature to guide treatment. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of this cancer. METHODS: The SEER database (National Cancer Institute) was queried for locoregional cases of small cell rectal cancer. Years of diagnosis were limited to 1988–2010 (most recent available) to reduce variability in staging criteria or longitudinal changes in surgery and radiation techniques. Two month conditional survival was applied to minimize bias by excluding patients who did not survive long enough to receive cancer-directed therapy. Patient demographics between the RT and No_RT groups were compared using Pearson Chi-Square tests. Overall survival was compared between patients who received radiotherapy (RT, n = 43) and those who did not (No_RT, n = 28) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate important covariates. RESULTS: Median survival was significantly longer for patients who received radiation compared to those who were not treated with radiation; 26 mo vs. 8 mo, respectively (log-rank P = 0.009). We also noted a higher 1-year overall survival rate for those who received radiation (71.1% vs. 37.8%). Unadjusted hazard ratio for death (HR) was 0.495 with the use of radiation (95% CI 0.286-0.858). Among surgery, radiotherapy, sex and age at diagnosis, radiation therapy was the only significant factor for overall survival with a multivariate HR for death of 0.393 (95% CI 0.206-0.750, P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Using SEER data, we have identified a significant survival advantage with the use of radiation therapy in the setting of rectal small cell carcinoma. Limitations of the SEER data apply to this study, particularly the lack of information on chemotherapy usage. Our findings strongly support the use of radiation therapy for patients with locoregional small cell rectal cancer. BioMed Central 2015-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4464878/ /pubmed/25902707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0411-y Text en © Modrek et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Modrek, Aram S
Hsu, Howard C
Leichman, Cynthia G
Du, Kevin L
Radiation therapy improves survival in rectal small cell cancer - Analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data
title Radiation therapy improves survival in rectal small cell cancer - Analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data
title_full Radiation therapy improves survival in rectal small cell cancer - Analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data
title_fullStr Radiation therapy improves survival in rectal small cell cancer - Analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data
title_full_unstemmed Radiation therapy improves survival in rectal small cell cancer - Analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data
title_short Radiation therapy improves survival in rectal small cell cancer - Analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data
title_sort radiation therapy improves survival in rectal small cell cancer - analysis of surveillance epidemiology and end results (seer) data
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25902707
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0411-y
work_keys_str_mv AT modrekarams radiationtherapyimprovessurvivalinrectalsmallcellcanceranalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdata
AT hsuhowardc radiationtherapyimprovessurvivalinrectalsmallcellcanceranalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdata
AT leichmancynthiag radiationtherapyimprovessurvivalinrectalsmallcellcanceranalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdata
AT dukevinl radiationtherapyimprovessurvivalinrectalsmallcellcanceranalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseerdata