Cargando…

The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era

The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within and outside the scientific community, especially in relation to major publishers’ high profit margins. However, the share of scientific output published in the journals of these major publishers, as well...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larivière, Vincent, Haustein, Stefanie, Mongeon, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
_version_ 1782376084451360768
author Larivière, Vincent
Haustein, Stefanie
Mongeon, Philippe
author_facet Larivière, Vincent
Haustein, Stefanie
Mongeon, Philippe
author_sort Larivière, Vincent
collection PubMed
description The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within and outside the scientific community, especially in relation to major publishers’ high profit margins. However, the share of scientific output published in the journals of these major publishers, as well as its evolution over time and across various disciplines, has not yet been analyzed. This paper provides such analysis, based on 45 million documents indexed in the Web of Science over the period 1973-2013. It shows that in both natural and medical sciences (NMS) and social sciences and humanities (SSH), Reed-Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Springer, and Taylor & Francis increased their share of the published output, especially since the advent of the digital era (mid-1990s). Combined, the top five most prolific publishers account for more than 50% of all papers published in 2013. Disciplines of the social sciences have the highest level of concentration (70% of papers from the top five publishers), while the humanities have remained relatively independent (20% from top five publishers). NMS disciplines are in between, mainly because of the strength of their scientific societies, such as the ACS in chemistry or APS in physics. The paper also examines the migration of journals between small and big publishing houses and explores the effect of publisher change on citation impact. It concludes with a discussion on the economics of scholarly publishing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4465327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44653272015-06-25 The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era Larivière, Vincent Haustein, Stefanie Mongeon, Philippe PLoS One Research Article The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within and outside the scientific community, especially in relation to major publishers’ high profit margins. However, the share of scientific output published in the journals of these major publishers, as well as its evolution over time and across various disciplines, has not yet been analyzed. This paper provides such analysis, based on 45 million documents indexed in the Web of Science over the period 1973-2013. It shows that in both natural and medical sciences (NMS) and social sciences and humanities (SSH), Reed-Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Springer, and Taylor & Francis increased their share of the published output, especially since the advent of the digital era (mid-1990s). Combined, the top five most prolific publishers account for more than 50% of all papers published in 2013. Disciplines of the social sciences have the highest level of concentration (70% of papers from the top five publishers), while the humanities have remained relatively independent (20% from top five publishers). NMS disciplines are in between, mainly because of the strength of their scientific societies, such as the ACS in chemistry or APS in physics. The paper also examines the migration of journals between small and big publishing houses and explores the effect of publisher change on citation impact. It concludes with a discussion on the economics of scholarly publishing. Public Library of Science 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4465327/ /pubmed/26061978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 Text en © 2015 Larivière et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Larivière, Vincent
Haustein, Stefanie
Mongeon, Philippe
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
title The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
title_full The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
title_fullStr The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
title_full_unstemmed The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
title_short The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era
title_sort oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502
work_keys_str_mv AT larivierevincent theoligopolyofacademicpublishersinthedigitalera
AT hausteinstefanie theoligopolyofacademicpublishersinthedigitalera
AT mongeonphilippe theoligopolyofacademicpublishersinthedigitalera
AT larivierevincent oligopolyofacademicpublishersinthedigitalera
AT hausteinstefanie oligopolyofacademicpublishersinthedigitalera
AT mongeonphilippe oligopolyofacademicpublishersinthedigitalera