Cargando…

Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND: The brain’s initial innate response to stroke is primarily mediated by microglia, the resident macrophage of the CNS. However, as early as 4 h after stroke, the blood–brain barrier is compromised and monocyte infiltration occurs. The lack of discriminating markers between these two myelo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ritzel, Rodney M., Patel, Anita R., Grenier, Jeremy M., Crapser, Joshua, Verma, Rajkumar, Jellison, Evan R., McCullough, Louise D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26022493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0329-1
_version_ 1782376095472943104
author Ritzel, Rodney M.
Patel, Anita R.
Grenier, Jeremy M.
Crapser, Joshua
Verma, Rajkumar
Jellison, Evan R.
McCullough, Louise D.
author_facet Ritzel, Rodney M.
Patel, Anita R.
Grenier, Jeremy M.
Crapser, Joshua
Verma, Rajkumar
Jellison, Evan R.
McCullough, Louise D.
author_sort Ritzel, Rodney M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The brain’s initial innate response to stroke is primarily mediated by microglia, the resident macrophage of the CNS. However, as early as 4 h after stroke, the blood–brain barrier is compromised and monocyte infiltration occurs. The lack of discriminating markers between these two myeloid populations has led many studies to generate conclusions based on the grouping of these two populations. A growing body of evidence now supports the distinct roles played by microglia and monocytes in many disease models. METHODS: Using a flow cytometry approach, combined with ex-vivo functional assays, we were able to distinguish microglia from monocytes using the relative expression of CD45 and assess the function of each cell type following stroke over the course of 7 days. RESULTS: We found that at 72 h after a 90-min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), microglia populations decrease whereas monocytes significantly increase in the stroke brain compared to sham. After stroke, BRDU incorporation into monocytes in the bone marrow increased. After recruitment to the ischemic brain, these monocytes accounted for nearly all BRDU-positive macrophages. Inflammatory activity peaked at 72 h. Microglia produced relatively higher reactive oxygen species and TNF, whereas monocytes were the predominant IL-1β producer. Although microglia showed enhanced phagocytic activity after stroke, monocytes had significantly higher phagocytic capacity at 72 h. Interestingly, we found a positive correlation between TNF expression levels and phagocytic activity of microglia after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the resident microglia population is vulnerable to the effects of severe ischemia, show compromised cell cycle progression, and adopt a largely pro-inflammatory phenotype after stroke. Infiltrating monocytes are primarily involved with early debris clearance of dying cells. These findings suggest that the early wave of infiltrating monocytes may be beneficial to stroke repair and future therapies aimed at mitigating microglia cell death may prove more effective than attempting to elicit targeted anti-inflammatory responses from damaged cells. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12974-015-0329-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4465481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44654812015-06-15 Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke Ritzel, Rodney M. Patel, Anita R. Grenier, Jeremy M. Crapser, Joshua Verma, Rajkumar Jellison, Evan R. McCullough, Louise D. J Neuroinflammation Research BACKGROUND: The brain’s initial innate response to stroke is primarily mediated by microglia, the resident macrophage of the CNS. However, as early as 4 h after stroke, the blood–brain barrier is compromised and monocyte infiltration occurs. The lack of discriminating markers between these two myeloid populations has led many studies to generate conclusions based on the grouping of these two populations. A growing body of evidence now supports the distinct roles played by microglia and monocytes in many disease models. METHODS: Using a flow cytometry approach, combined with ex-vivo functional assays, we were able to distinguish microglia from monocytes using the relative expression of CD45 and assess the function of each cell type following stroke over the course of 7 days. RESULTS: We found that at 72 h after a 90-min middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO), microglia populations decrease whereas monocytes significantly increase in the stroke brain compared to sham. After stroke, BRDU incorporation into monocytes in the bone marrow increased. After recruitment to the ischemic brain, these monocytes accounted for nearly all BRDU-positive macrophages. Inflammatory activity peaked at 72 h. Microglia produced relatively higher reactive oxygen species and TNF, whereas monocytes were the predominant IL-1β producer. Although microglia showed enhanced phagocytic activity after stroke, monocytes had significantly higher phagocytic capacity at 72 h. Interestingly, we found a positive correlation between TNF expression levels and phagocytic activity of microglia after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the resident microglia population is vulnerable to the effects of severe ischemia, show compromised cell cycle progression, and adopt a largely pro-inflammatory phenotype after stroke. Infiltrating monocytes are primarily involved with early debris clearance of dying cells. These findings suggest that the early wave of infiltrating monocytes may be beneficial to stroke repair and future therapies aimed at mitigating microglia cell death may prove more effective than attempting to elicit targeted anti-inflammatory responses from damaged cells. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12974-015-0329-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4465481/ /pubmed/26022493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0329-1 Text en © Ritzel et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ritzel, Rodney M.
Patel, Anita R.
Grenier, Jeremy M.
Crapser, Joshua
Verma, Rajkumar
Jellison, Evan R.
McCullough, Louise D.
Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke
title Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke
title_full Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke
title_fullStr Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke
title_full_unstemmed Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke
title_short Functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke
title_sort functional differences between microglia and monocytes after ischemic stroke
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26022493
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-015-0329-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ritzelrodneym functionaldifferencesbetweenmicrogliaandmonocytesafterischemicstroke
AT patelanitar functionaldifferencesbetweenmicrogliaandmonocytesafterischemicstroke
AT grenierjeremym functionaldifferencesbetweenmicrogliaandmonocytesafterischemicstroke
AT crapserjoshua functionaldifferencesbetweenmicrogliaandmonocytesafterischemicstroke
AT vermarajkumar functionaldifferencesbetweenmicrogliaandmonocytesafterischemicstroke
AT jellisonevanr functionaldifferencesbetweenmicrogliaandmonocytesafterischemicstroke
AT mcculloughlouised functionaldifferencesbetweenmicrogliaandmonocytesafterischemicstroke