Cargando…
The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for patients with movement disorders. Patients receiving chronic DBS provide a unique opportunity to explore the underlying mechanisms of DBS using functional MRI. It has been shown that the main safety concern with MRI in these pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129077 |
_version_ | 1782376119847092224 |
---|---|
author | Kahan, Joshua Papadaki, Anastasia White, Mark Mancini, Laura Yousry, Tarek Zrinzo, Ludvic Limousin, Patricia Hariz, Marwan Foltynie, Tom Thornton, John |
author_facet | Kahan, Joshua Papadaki, Anastasia White, Mark Mancini, Laura Yousry, Tarek Zrinzo, Ludvic Limousin, Patricia Hariz, Marwan Foltynie, Tom Thornton, John |
author_sort | Kahan, Joshua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for patients with movement disorders. Patients receiving chronic DBS provide a unique opportunity to explore the underlying mechanisms of DBS using functional MRI. It has been shown that the main safety concern with MRI in these patients is heating at the electrode tips – which can be minimised with strict adherence to a supervised acquisition protocol using a head-transmit/receive coil at 1.5T. MRI using the body-transmit coil with a multi-channel receive head coil has a number of potential advantages including an improved signal-to-noise ratio. STUDY OUTLINE: We compared the safety of cranial MRI in an in vitro model of bilateral DBS using both head-transmit and body-transmit coils. We performed fibre-optic thermometry at a Medtronic ActivaPC device and Medtronic 3389 electrodes during turbo-spin echo (TSE) MRI using both coil arrangements at 1.5T and 3T, in addition to gradient-echo echo-planar fMRI exposure at 1.5T. Finally, we investigated the effect of transmit-coil choice on DBS stimulus delivery during MRI. RESULTS: Temperature increases were consistently largest at the electrode tips. Changing from head- to body-transmit coil significantly increased the electrode temperature elevation during TSE scans with scanner-reported head SAR 0.2W/kg from 0.45°C to 0.79°C (p<0.001) at 1.5T, and from 1.25°C to 1.44°C (p<0.001) at 3T. The position of the phantom relative to the body coil significantly impacted on electrode heating at 1.5T; however, the greatest heating observed in any position tested remained <1°C at this field strength. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) with our specific hardware and SAR-limited protocol, body-transmit cranial MRI at 1.5T does not produce heating exceeding international guidelines, even in cases of poorly positioned patients, (2) cranial MRI at 3T can readily produce heating exceeding international guidelines, (3) patients with ActivaPC Medtronic systems are safe to be recruited to future fMRI experiments performed under the specific conditions defined by our protocol, with no likelihood of confound by inappropriate stimulus delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4465697 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44656972015-06-25 The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices Kahan, Joshua Papadaki, Anastasia White, Mark Mancini, Laura Yousry, Tarek Zrinzo, Ludvic Limousin, Patricia Hariz, Marwan Foltynie, Tom Thornton, John PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for patients with movement disorders. Patients receiving chronic DBS provide a unique opportunity to explore the underlying mechanisms of DBS using functional MRI. It has been shown that the main safety concern with MRI in these patients is heating at the electrode tips – which can be minimised with strict adherence to a supervised acquisition protocol using a head-transmit/receive coil at 1.5T. MRI using the body-transmit coil with a multi-channel receive head coil has a number of potential advantages including an improved signal-to-noise ratio. STUDY OUTLINE: We compared the safety of cranial MRI in an in vitro model of bilateral DBS using both head-transmit and body-transmit coils. We performed fibre-optic thermometry at a Medtronic ActivaPC device and Medtronic 3389 electrodes during turbo-spin echo (TSE) MRI using both coil arrangements at 1.5T and 3T, in addition to gradient-echo echo-planar fMRI exposure at 1.5T. Finally, we investigated the effect of transmit-coil choice on DBS stimulus delivery during MRI. RESULTS: Temperature increases were consistently largest at the electrode tips. Changing from head- to body-transmit coil significantly increased the electrode temperature elevation during TSE scans with scanner-reported head SAR 0.2W/kg from 0.45°C to 0.79°C (p<0.001) at 1.5T, and from 1.25°C to 1.44°C (p<0.001) at 3T. The position of the phantom relative to the body coil significantly impacted on electrode heating at 1.5T; however, the greatest heating observed in any position tested remained <1°C at this field strength. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) with our specific hardware and SAR-limited protocol, body-transmit cranial MRI at 1.5T does not produce heating exceeding international guidelines, even in cases of poorly positioned patients, (2) cranial MRI at 3T can readily produce heating exceeding international guidelines, (3) patients with ActivaPC Medtronic systems are safe to be recruited to future fMRI experiments performed under the specific conditions defined by our protocol, with no likelihood of confound by inappropriate stimulus delivery. Public Library of Science 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4465697/ /pubmed/26061738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129077 Text en © 2015 Kahan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kahan, Joshua Papadaki, Anastasia White, Mark Mancini, Laura Yousry, Tarek Zrinzo, Ludvic Limousin, Patricia Hariz, Marwan Foltynie, Tom Thornton, John The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices |
title | The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices |
title_full | The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices |
title_fullStr | The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices |
title_full_unstemmed | The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices |
title_short | The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices |
title_sort | safety of using body-transmit mri in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465697/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kahanjoshua thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT papadakianastasia thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT whitemark thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT mancinilaura thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT yousrytarek thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT zrinzoludvic thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT limousinpatricia thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT harizmarwan thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT foltynietom thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT thorntonjohn thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT kahanjoshua safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT papadakianastasia safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT whitemark safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT mancinilaura safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT yousrytarek safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT zrinzoludvic safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT limousinpatricia safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT harizmarwan safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT foltynietom safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices AT thorntonjohn safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices |