Cargando…

The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices

BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for patients with movement disorders. Patients receiving chronic DBS provide a unique opportunity to explore the underlying mechanisms of DBS using functional MRI. It has been shown that the main safety concern with MRI in these pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kahan, Joshua, Papadaki, Anastasia, White, Mark, Mancini, Laura, Yousry, Tarek, Zrinzo, Ludvic, Limousin, Patricia, Hariz, Marwan, Foltynie, Tom, Thornton, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129077
_version_ 1782376119847092224
author Kahan, Joshua
Papadaki, Anastasia
White, Mark
Mancini, Laura
Yousry, Tarek
Zrinzo, Ludvic
Limousin, Patricia
Hariz, Marwan
Foltynie, Tom
Thornton, John
author_facet Kahan, Joshua
Papadaki, Anastasia
White, Mark
Mancini, Laura
Yousry, Tarek
Zrinzo, Ludvic
Limousin, Patricia
Hariz, Marwan
Foltynie, Tom
Thornton, John
author_sort Kahan, Joshua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for patients with movement disorders. Patients receiving chronic DBS provide a unique opportunity to explore the underlying mechanisms of DBS using functional MRI. It has been shown that the main safety concern with MRI in these patients is heating at the electrode tips – which can be minimised with strict adherence to a supervised acquisition protocol using a head-transmit/receive coil at 1.5T. MRI using the body-transmit coil with a multi-channel receive head coil has a number of potential advantages including an improved signal-to-noise ratio. STUDY OUTLINE: We compared the safety of cranial MRI in an in vitro model of bilateral DBS using both head-transmit and body-transmit coils. We performed fibre-optic thermometry at a Medtronic ActivaPC device and Medtronic 3389 electrodes during turbo-spin echo (TSE) MRI using both coil arrangements at 1.5T and 3T, in addition to gradient-echo echo-planar fMRI exposure at 1.5T. Finally, we investigated the effect of transmit-coil choice on DBS stimulus delivery during MRI. RESULTS: Temperature increases were consistently largest at the electrode tips. Changing from head- to body-transmit coil significantly increased the electrode temperature elevation during TSE scans with scanner-reported head SAR 0.2W/kg from 0.45°C to 0.79°C (p<0.001) at 1.5T, and from 1.25°C to 1.44°C (p<0.001) at 3T. The position of the phantom relative to the body coil significantly impacted on electrode heating at 1.5T; however, the greatest heating observed in any position tested remained <1°C at this field strength. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) with our specific hardware and SAR-limited protocol, body-transmit cranial MRI at 1.5T does not produce heating exceeding international guidelines, even in cases of poorly positioned patients, (2) cranial MRI at 3T can readily produce heating exceeding international guidelines, (3) patients with ActivaPC Medtronic systems are safe to be recruited to future fMRI experiments performed under the specific conditions defined by our protocol, with no likelihood of confound by inappropriate stimulus delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4465697
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44656972015-06-25 The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices Kahan, Joshua Papadaki, Anastasia White, Mark Mancini, Laura Yousry, Tarek Zrinzo, Ludvic Limousin, Patricia Hariz, Marwan Foltynie, Tom Thornton, John PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for patients with movement disorders. Patients receiving chronic DBS provide a unique opportunity to explore the underlying mechanisms of DBS using functional MRI. It has been shown that the main safety concern with MRI in these patients is heating at the electrode tips – which can be minimised with strict adherence to a supervised acquisition protocol using a head-transmit/receive coil at 1.5T. MRI using the body-transmit coil with a multi-channel receive head coil has a number of potential advantages including an improved signal-to-noise ratio. STUDY OUTLINE: We compared the safety of cranial MRI in an in vitro model of bilateral DBS using both head-transmit and body-transmit coils. We performed fibre-optic thermometry at a Medtronic ActivaPC device and Medtronic 3389 electrodes during turbo-spin echo (TSE) MRI using both coil arrangements at 1.5T and 3T, in addition to gradient-echo echo-planar fMRI exposure at 1.5T. Finally, we investigated the effect of transmit-coil choice on DBS stimulus delivery during MRI. RESULTS: Temperature increases were consistently largest at the electrode tips. Changing from head- to body-transmit coil significantly increased the electrode temperature elevation during TSE scans with scanner-reported head SAR 0.2W/kg from 0.45°C to 0.79°C (p<0.001) at 1.5T, and from 1.25°C to 1.44°C (p<0.001) at 3T. The position of the phantom relative to the body coil significantly impacted on electrode heating at 1.5T; however, the greatest heating observed in any position tested remained <1°C at this field strength. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) with our specific hardware and SAR-limited protocol, body-transmit cranial MRI at 1.5T does not produce heating exceeding international guidelines, even in cases of poorly positioned patients, (2) cranial MRI at 3T can readily produce heating exceeding international guidelines, (3) patients with ActivaPC Medtronic systems are safe to be recruited to future fMRI experiments performed under the specific conditions defined by our protocol, with no likelihood of confound by inappropriate stimulus delivery. Public Library of Science 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4465697/ /pubmed/26061738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129077 Text en © 2015 Kahan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kahan, Joshua
Papadaki, Anastasia
White, Mark
Mancini, Laura
Yousry, Tarek
Zrinzo, Ludvic
Limousin, Patricia
Hariz, Marwan
Foltynie, Tom
Thornton, John
The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices
title The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices
title_full The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices
title_fullStr The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices
title_full_unstemmed The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices
title_short The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices
title_sort safety of using body-transmit mri in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465697/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129077
work_keys_str_mv AT kahanjoshua thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT papadakianastasia thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT whitemark thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT mancinilaura thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT yousrytarek thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT zrinzoludvic thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT limousinpatricia thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT harizmarwan thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT foltynietom thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT thorntonjohn thesafetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT kahanjoshua safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT papadakianastasia safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT whitemark safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT mancinilaura safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT yousrytarek safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT zrinzoludvic safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT limousinpatricia safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT harizmarwan safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT foltynietom safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices
AT thorntonjohn safetyofusingbodytransmitmriinpatientswithimplanteddeepbrainstimulationdevices