Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is known as the most effective treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, without proper therapy and patient management, stent thrombosis after PCI may lead to another myocardial infarction. In addition to aspirin and clopidogrel, tirof...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Xiuying, Li, Runjun, Jing, Quanmin, Liu, Yingfeng, Liu, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129718
_version_ 1782376147307200512
author Tang, Xiuying
Li, Runjun
Jing, Quanmin
Liu, Yingfeng
Liu, Peng
author_facet Tang, Xiuying
Li, Runjun
Jing, Quanmin
Liu, Yingfeng
Liu, Peng
author_sort Tang, Xiuying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is known as the most effective treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, without proper therapy and patient management, stent thrombosis after PCI may lead to another myocardial infarction. In addition to aspirin and clopidogrel, tirofiban is often used as an antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS. To date, there has been no comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of intracoronary (IC) tirofiban administration for ACS patients undergoing PCI compared with intravenous (IV) administration. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the clinical efficiency and safety of IC versus intravenous (IV) tirofiban in ACS patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Medline for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IC versus IV administration of tirofiban in ACS patients undergoing PCI. We evaluated the effects of tirofiban on thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow after PCI, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3 (TMP grade 3), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), death, reinfarction and adverse drug effects (specifically bleeding events). RESULTS: Seven trials involving 1,027 patients were included in this meta-analysis. IC administration of tirofiban significantly increased TIMI grade 3 flow (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.02 to 4.37; P = 0.04) and TMP grade 3 (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.09 to 6.49; P = 0.03, I(2) = 64%) while reducing MACE (OR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.75; P = 0.002) compared with IV administration of tirofiban. No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of TVR, death, reinfarction and the incidence of bleeding events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports the use of IC over IV administration of tirofiban in patients with ACS to improve TIMI flow, TMP flow and MACE. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of bleeding complications between the two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4465926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44659262015-06-25 Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Tang, Xiuying Li, Runjun Jing, Quanmin Liu, Yingfeng Liu, Peng PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is known as the most effective treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, without proper therapy and patient management, stent thrombosis after PCI may lead to another myocardial infarction. In addition to aspirin and clopidogrel, tirofiban is often used as an antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS. To date, there has been no comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of intracoronary (IC) tirofiban administration for ACS patients undergoing PCI compared with intravenous (IV) administration. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the clinical efficiency and safety of IC versus intravenous (IV) tirofiban in ACS patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Medline for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IC versus IV administration of tirofiban in ACS patients undergoing PCI. We evaluated the effects of tirofiban on thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow after PCI, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3 (TMP grade 3), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), death, reinfarction and adverse drug effects (specifically bleeding events). RESULTS: Seven trials involving 1,027 patients were included in this meta-analysis. IC administration of tirofiban significantly increased TIMI grade 3 flow (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.02 to 4.37; P = 0.04) and TMP grade 3 (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.09 to 6.49; P = 0.03, I(2) = 64%) while reducing MACE (OR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.75; P = 0.002) compared with IV administration of tirofiban. No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of TVR, death, reinfarction and the incidence of bleeding events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports the use of IC over IV administration of tirofiban in patients with ACS to improve TIMI flow, TMP flow and MACE. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of bleeding complications between the two groups. Public Library of Science 2015-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4465926/ /pubmed/26067296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129718 Text en © 2015 Tang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tang, Xiuying
Li, Runjun
Jing, Quanmin
Liu, Yingfeng
Liu, Peng
Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4465926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067296
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129718
work_keys_str_mv AT tangxiuying efficacyandsafetyofintracoronaryversusintravenousadministrationoftirofibanduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lirunjun efficacyandsafetyofintracoronaryversusintravenousadministrationoftirofibanduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jingquanmin efficacyandsafetyofintracoronaryversusintravenousadministrationoftirofibanduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuyingfeng efficacyandsafetyofintracoronaryversusintravenousadministrationoftirofibanduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liupeng efficacyandsafetyofintracoronaryversusintravenousadministrationoftirofibanduringpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforacutecoronarysyndromeametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials