Cargando…

Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection

Multiplexing samples in sequencing experiments is a common approach to maximize information yield while minimizing cost. In most cases the number of samples that are multiplexed is determined by financial consideration or experimental convenience, with limited understanding on the effects on the exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J., Bourque, Caitlin, Zhang, Xihui, Jiang, Yanwen, Houvras, Yariv, Alonso, Alicia, Betel, Doron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26066343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129350
_version_ 1782376158843633664
author Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J.
Bourque, Caitlin
Zhang, Xihui
Jiang, Yanwen
Houvras, Yariv
Alonso, Alicia
Betel, Doron
author_facet Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J.
Bourque, Caitlin
Zhang, Xihui
Jiang, Yanwen
Houvras, Yariv
Alonso, Alicia
Betel, Doron
author_sort Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J.
collection PubMed
description Multiplexing samples in sequencing experiments is a common approach to maximize information yield while minimizing cost. In most cases the number of samples that are multiplexed is determined by financial consideration or experimental convenience, with limited understanding on the effects on the experimental results. Here we set to examine the impact of multiplexing ChIP-seq experiments on the ability to identify a specific epigenetic modification. We performed peak detection analyses to determine the effects of multiplexing. These include false discovery rates, size, position and statistical significance of peak detection, and changes in gene annotation. We found that, for histone marker H3K4me3, one can multiplex up to 8 samples (7 IP + 1 input) at ~21 million single-end reads each and still detect over 90% of all peaks found when using a full lane for sample (~181 million reads). Furthermore, there are no variations introduced by indexing or lane batch effects and importantly there is no significant reduction in the number of genes with neighboring H3K4me3 peaks. We conclude that, for a well characterized antibody and, therefore, model IP condition, multiplexing 8 samples per lane is sufficient to capture most of the biological signal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44660192015-06-25 Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J. Bourque, Caitlin Zhang, Xihui Jiang, Yanwen Houvras, Yariv Alonso, Alicia Betel, Doron PLoS One Research Article Multiplexing samples in sequencing experiments is a common approach to maximize information yield while minimizing cost. In most cases the number of samples that are multiplexed is determined by financial consideration or experimental convenience, with limited understanding on the effects on the experimental results. Here we set to examine the impact of multiplexing ChIP-seq experiments on the ability to identify a specific epigenetic modification. We performed peak detection analyses to determine the effects of multiplexing. These include false discovery rates, size, position and statistical significance of peak detection, and changes in gene annotation. We found that, for histone marker H3K4me3, one can multiplex up to 8 samples (7 IP + 1 input) at ~21 million single-end reads each and still detect over 90% of all peaks found when using a full lane for sample (~181 million reads). Furthermore, there are no variations introduced by indexing or lane batch effects and importantly there is no significant reduction in the number of genes with neighboring H3K4me3 peaks. We conclude that, for a well characterized antibody and, therefore, model IP condition, multiplexing 8 samples per lane is sufficient to capture most of the biological signal. Public Library of Science 2015-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4466019/ /pubmed/26066343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129350 Text en © 2015 Kacmarczyk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J.
Bourque, Caitlin
Zhang, Xihui
Jiang, Yanwen
Houvras, Yariv
Alonso, Alicia
Betel, Doron
Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection
title Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection
title_full Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection
title_fullStr Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection
title_full_unstemmed Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection
title_short Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection
title_sort multiplexing of chip-seq samples in an optimized experimental condition has minimal impact on peak detection
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26066343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129350
work_keys_str_mv AT kacmarczykthadeousj multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection
AT bourquecaitlin multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection
AT zhangxihui multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection
AT jiangyanwen multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection
AT houvrasyariv multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection
AT alonsoalicia multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection
AT beteldoron multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection