Cargando…
Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection
Multiplexing samples in sequencing experiments is a common approach to maximize information yield while minimizing cost. In most cases the number of samples that are multiplexed is determined by financial consideration or experimental convenience, with limited understanding on the effects on the exp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26066343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129350 |
_version_ | 1782376158843633664 |
---|---|
author | Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J. Bourque, Caitlin Zhang, Xihui Jiang, Yanwen Houvras, Yariv Alonso, Alicia Betel, Doron |
author_facet | Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J. Bourque, Caitlin Zhang, Xihui Jiang, Yanwen Houvras, Yariv Alonso, Alicia Betel, Doron |
author_sort | Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiplexing samples in sequencing experiments is a common approach to maximize information yield while minimizing cost. In most cases the number of samples that are multiplexed is determined by financial consideration or experimental convenience, with limited understanding on the effects on the experimental results. Here we set to examine the impact of multiplexing ChIP-seq experiments on the ability to identify a specific epigenetic modification. We performed peak detection analyses to determine the effects of multiplexing. These include false discovery rates, size, position and statistical significance of peak detection, and changes in gene annotation. We found that, for histone marker H3K4me3, one can multiplex up to 8 samples (7 IP + 1 input) at ~21 million single-end reads each and still detect over 90% of all peaks found when using a full lane for sample (~181 million reads). Furthermore, there are no variations introduced by indexing or lane batch effects and importantly there is no significant reduction in the number of genes with neighboring H3K4me3 peaks. We conclude that, for a well characterized antibody and, therefore, model IP condition, multiplexing 8 samples per lane is sufficient to capture most of the biological signal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4466019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44660192015-06-25 Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J. Bourque, Caitlin Zhang, Xihui Jiang, Yanwen Houvras, Yariv Alonso, Alicia Betel, Doron PLoS One Research Article Multiplexing samples in sequencing experiments is a common approach to maximize information yield while minimizing cost. In most cases the number of samples that are multiplexed is determined by financial consideration or experimental convenience, with limited understanding on the effects on the experimental results. Here we set to examine the impact of multiplexing ChIP-seq experiments on the ability to identify a specific epigenetic modification. We performed peak detection analyses to determine the effects of multiplexing. These include false discovery rates, size, position and statistical significance of peak detection, and changes in gene annotation. We found that, for histone marker H3K4me3, one can multiplex up to 8 samples (7 IP + 1 input) at ~21 million single-end reads each and still detect over 90% of all peaks found when using a full lane for sample (~181 million reads). Furthermore, there are no variations introduced by indexing or lane batch effects and importantly there is no significant reduction in the number of genes with neighboring H3K4me3 peaks. We conclude that, for a well characterized antibody and, therefore, model IP condition, multiplexing 8 samples per lane is sufficient to capture most of the biological signal. Public Library of Science 2015-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4466019/ /pubmed/26066343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129350 Text en © 2015 Kacmarczyk et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kacmarczyk, Thadeous J. Bourque, Caitlin Zhang, Xihui Jiang, Yanwen Houvras, Yariv Alonso, Alicia Betel, Doron Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection |
title | Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection |
title_full | Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection |
title_fullStr | Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection |
title_short | Multiplexing of ChIP-Seq Samples in an Optimized Experimental Condition Has Minimal Impact on Peak Detection |
title_sort | multiplexing of chip-seq samples in an optimized experimental condition has minimal impact on peak detection |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26066343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129350 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kacmarczykthadeousj multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection AT bourquecaitlin multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection AT zhangxihui multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection AT jiangyanwen multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection AT houvrasyariv multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection AT alonsoalicia multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection AT beteldoron multiplexingofchipseqsamplesinanoptimizedexperimentalconditionhasminimalimpactonpeakdetection |