Cargando…

A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers

Ecological niche models are widely used for mapping the distribution of species during the last glacial maximum (LGM). Although the selection of the variables and General Circulation Models (GCMs) used for constructing those maps determine the model predictions, we still lack a discussion about whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varela, Sara, Lima-Ribeiro, Matheus S., Terribile, Levi Carina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129037
_version_ 1782376159342755840
author Varela, Sara
Lima-Ribeiro, Matheus S.
Terribile, Levi Carina
author_facet Varela, Sara
Lima-Ribeiro, Matheus S.
Terribile, Levi Carina
author_sort Varela, Sara
collection PubMed
description Ecological niche models are widely used for mapping the distribution of species during the last glacial maximum (LGM). Although the selection of the variables and General Circulation Models (GCMs) used for constructing those maps determine the model predictions, we still lack a discussion about which variables and which GCM should be included in the analysis and why. Here, we analyzed the climatic predictions for the LGM of 9 different GCMs in order to help biogeographers to select their GCMs and climatic layers for mapping the species ranges in the LGM. We 1) map the discrepancies between the climatic predictions of the nine GCMs available for the LGM, 2) analyze the similarities and differences between the GCMs and group them to help researchers choose the appropriate GCMs for calibrating and projecting their ecological niche models (ENM) during the LGM, and 3) quantify the agreement of the predictions for each bioclimatic variable to help researchers avoid the environmental variables with a poor consensus between models. Our results indicate that, in absolute values, GCMs have a strong disagreement in their temperature predictions for temperate areas, while the uncertainties for the precipitation variables are in the tropics. In spite of the discrepancies between model predictions, temperature variables (BIO1-BIO11) are highly correlated between models. Precipitation variables (BIO12- BIO19) show no correlation between models, and specifically, BIO14 (precipitation of the driest month) and BIO15 (Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation)) show the highest level of discrepancy between GCMs. Following our results, we strongly recommend the use of different GCMs for constructing or projecting ENMs, particularly when predicting the distribution of species that inhabit the tropics and the temperate areas of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, because climatic predictions for those areas vary greatly among GCMs. We also recommend the exclusion of BIO14 and BIO15 from ENMs because those variables show a high level of discrepancy between GCMs. Thus, by excluding them, we decrease the level of uncertainty of our predictions. All the climatic layers produced for this paper are freely available in http://ecoclimate.org/.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44660212015-06-25 A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers Varela, Sara Lima-Ribeiro, Matheus S. Terribile, Levi Carina PLoS One Research Article Ecological niche models are widely used for mapping the distribution of species during the last glacial maximum (LGM). Although the selection of the variables and General Circulation Models (GCMs) used for constructing those maps determine the model predictions, we still lack a discussion about which variables and which GCM should be included in the analysis and why. Here, we analyzed the climatic predictions for the LGM of 9 different GCMs in order to help biogeographers to select their GCMs and climatic layers for mapping the species ranges in the LGM. We 1) map the discrepancies between the climatic predictions of the nine GCMs available for the LGM, 2) analyze the similarities and differences between the GCMs and group them to help researchers choose the appropriate GCMs for calibrating and projecting their ecological niche models (ENM) during the LGM, and 3) quantify the agreement of the predictions for each bioclimatic variable to help researchers avoid the environmental variables with a poor consensus between models. Our results indicate that, in absolute values, GCMs have a strong disagreement in their temperature predictions for temperate areas, while the uncertainties for the precipitation variables are in the tropics. In spite of the discrepancies between model predictions, temperature variables (BIO1-BIO11) are highly correlated between models. Precipitation variables (BIO12- BIO19) show no correlation between models, and specifically, BIO14 (precipitation of the driest month) and BIO15 (Precipitation Seasonality (Coefficient of Variation)) show the highest level of discrepancy between GCMs. Following our results, we strongly recommend the use of different GCMs for constructing or projecting ENMs, particularly when predicting the distribution of species that inhabit the tropics and the temperate areas of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, because climatic predictions for those areas vary greatly among GCMs. We also recommend the exclusion of BIO14 and BIO15 from ENMs because those variables show a high level of discrepancy between GCMs. Thus, by excluding them, we decrease the level of uncertainty of our predictions. All the climatic layers produced for this paper are freely available in http://ecoclimate.org/. Public Library of Science 2015-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4466021/ /pubmed/26068930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129037 Text en © 2015 Varela et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Varela, Sara
Lima-Ribeiro, Matheus S.
Terribile, Levi Carina
A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers
title A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers
title_full A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers
title_fullStr A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers
title_full_unstemmed A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers
title_short A Short Guide to the Climatic Variables of the Last Glacial Maximum for Biogeographers
title_sort short guide to the climatic variables of the last glacial maximum for biogeographers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129037
work_keys_str_mv AT varelasara ashortguidetotheclimaticvariablesofthelastglacialmaximumforbiogeographers
AT limaribeiromatheuss ashortguidetotheclimaticvariablesofthelastglacialmaximumforbiogeographers
AT terribilelevicarina ashortguidetotheclimaticvariablesofthelastglacialmaximumforbiogeographers
AT varelasara shortguidetotheclimaticvariablesofthelastglacialmaximumforbiogeographers
AT limaribeiromatheuss shortguidetotheclimaticvariablesofthelastglacialmaximumforbiogeographers
AT terribilelevicarina shortguidetotheclimaticvariablesofthelastglacialmaximumforbiogeographers