Cargando…

An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: From the viewpoint of human factors and ergonomics (HFE), errors often occur because of the mismatch between the system, technique and characteristics of the human body. HFE is a scientific discipline concerned with understanding interactions between human behavior, system design and saf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mao, Xuanyue, Jia, Pengli, Zhang, Longhao, Zhao, Pujing, Chen, Ying, Zhang, Mingming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129948
_version_ 1782376189795500032
author Mao, Xuanyue
Jia, Pengli
Zhang, Longhao
Zhao, Pujing
Chen, Ying
Zhang, Mingming
author_facet Mao, Xuanyue
Jia, Pengli
Zhang, Longhao
Zhao, Pujing
Chen, Ying
Zhang, Mingming
author_sort Mao, Xuanyue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: From the viewpoint of human factors and ergonomics (HFE), errors often occur because of the mismatch between the system, technique and characteristics of the human body. HFE is a scientific discipline concerned with understanding interactions between human behavior, system design and safety. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of HFE interventions in improving health care workers’ outcomes and patient safety and to assess the quality of the available evidence. METHODS: We searched databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews and the CBM (Chinese BioMedical Literature Database), for articles published from 1996 to Mar.2015. The quality assessment tool was based on the risk of bias criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) Group. The interventions of the included studies were categorized into four relevant domains, as defined by the International Ergonomics Association. RESULTS: For this descriptive study, we identified 8, 949 studies based on our initial search. Finally, 28 studies with 3,227 participants were included. Among the 28 included studies, 20 studies were controlled studies, two of which were randomized controlled trials. The other eight studies were before/after surveys, without controls. Most of the studies were of moderate or low quality. Five broad categories of outcomes were identified in this study: 1) medical errors or patient safety, 2) health care workers’ quality of working life (e.g. reduced fatigue, discomfort, workload, pain and injury), 3) user performance (e.g., efficiency or accuracy), 4) health care workers’ attitudes towards the interventions(e.g., satisfaction and preference), and 5) economic evaluations. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the interventions positively affected the outcomes of health care workers. Few studies considered the financial merits of these interventions. Most of the included studies were of moderate quality. This review highlights the need for scientific and standardized guidelines regarding how HFE should be implemented in health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44663222015-06-22 An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review Mao, Xuanyue Jia, Pengli Zhang, Longhao Zhao, Pujing Chen, Ying Zhang, Mingming PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: From the viewpoint of human factors and ergonomics (HFE), errors often occur because of the mismatch between the system, technique and characteristics of the human body. HFE is a scientific discipline concerned with understanding interactions between human behavior, system design and safety. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of HFE interventions in improving health care workers’ outcomes and patient safety and to assess the quality of the available evidence. METHODS: We searched databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS Previews and the CBM (Chinese BioMedical Literature Database), for articles published from 1996 to Mar.2015. The quality assessment tool was based on the risk of bias criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) Group. The interventions of the included studies were categorized into four relevant domains, as defined by the International Ergonomics Association. RESULTS: For this descriptive study, we identified 8, 949 studies based on our initial search. Finally, 28 studies with 3,227 participants were included. Among the 28 included studies, 20 studies were controlled studies, two of which were randomized controlled trials. The other eight studies were before/after surveys, without controls. Most of the studies were of moderate or low quality. Five broad categories of outcomes were identified in this study: 1) medical errors or patient safety, 2) health care workers’ quality of working life (e.g. reduced fatigue, discomfort, workload, pain and injury), 3) user performance (e.g., efficiency or accuracy), 4) health care workers’ attitudes towards the interventions(e.g., satisfaction and preference), and 5) economic evaluations. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the interventions positively affected the outcomes of health care workers. Few studies considered the financial merits of these interventions. Most of the included studies were of moderate quality. This review highlights the need for scientific and standardized guidelines regarding how HFE should be implemented in health care. Public Library of Science 2015-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4466322/ /pubmed/26067774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129948 Text en © 2015 Mao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mao, Xuanyue
Jia, Pengli
Zhang, Longhao
Zhao, Pujing
Chen, Ying
Zhang, Mingming
An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review
title An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review
title_full An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review
title_short An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluation of the effects of human factors and ergonomics on health care and patient safety practices: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129948
work_keys_str_mv AT maoxuanyue anevaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT jiapengli anevaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT zhanglonghao anevaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT zhaopujing anevaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT chenying anevaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT zhangmingming anevaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT maoxuanyue evaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT jiapengli evaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT zhanglonghao evaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT zhaopujing evaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT chenying evaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview
AT zhangmingming evaluationoftheeffectsofhumanfactorsandergonomicsonhealthcareandpatientsafetypracticesasystematicreview