Cargando…

Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

Background : The impact of the RECIST 1.1 on the selection of target lesions and assessment of tumor response was not evaluated in patients with advanced NSCLC who received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line chemothera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Hyun Chang, Kim, Jung Han, Kim, Hyeong Su, Jung, Soong Goo, Hwang, Sang Muk, Ju, Sung Bae, Yang, Ik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078796
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.11794
_version_ 1782376211472711680
author Choi, Hyun Chang
Kim, Jung Han
Kim, Hyeong Su
Jung, Soong Goo
Hwang, Sang Muk
Ju, Sung Bae
Yang, Ik
author_facet Choi, Hyun Chang
Kim, Jung Han
Kim, Hyeong Su
Jung, Soong Goo
Hwang, Sang Muk
Ju, Sung Bae
Yang, Ik
author_sort Choi, Hyun Chang
collection PubMed
description Background : The impact of the RECIST 1.1 on the selection of target lesions and assessment of tumor response was not evaluated in patients with advanced NSCLC who received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line chemotherapy between January 2004 and December 2013 and compared the selection of target lesions and tumor responses using the two RECIST versions. Results: A total of 88 patients who had at least one target lesion according to the RECIST 1.0 were included in the study. The number of target lesions by the RECIST 1.1 was significantly lower than that by the RECIST 1.0. When adopting the RECIST 1.1 instead of the RECIST 1.0, 40 patients (45.4%) showed a decrease in the number of target lesions. Three patients no longer had target lesion because of the new lymph node (LN) criteria of the RECIST 1.1. Tumor responses showed a high level of concordance between the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1, with a kappa value of 0.912. Four patients (4.5%) showed disagreement of tumor responses between the two criteria, which were all due to the change of the LN criteria. Conclusion: The RECIST 1.1 showed a high level of concordance with the RECIST 1.0 in the assessment of tumor response in advanced NSCLC patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. The new LN criteria were the major cause of the reduction of target lesions and reclassification of the tumor response.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44664152015-06-15 Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Choi, Hyun Chang Kim, Jung Han Kim, Hyeong Su Jung, Soong Goo Hwang, Sang Muk Ju, Sung Bae Yang, Ik J Cancer Research Paper Background : The impact of the RECIST 1.1 on the selection of target lesions and assessment of tumor response was not evaluated in patients with advanced NSCLC who received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line chemotherapy between January 2004 and December 2013 and compared the selection of target lesions and tumor responses using the two RECIST versions. Results: A total of 88 patients who had at least one target lesion according to the RECIST 1.0 were included in the study. The number of target lesions by the RECIST 1.1 was significantly lower than that by the RECIST 1.0. When adopting the RECIST 1.1 instead of the RECIST 1.0, 40 patients (45.4%) showed a decrease in the number of target lesions. Three patients no longer had target lesion because of the new lymph node (LN) criteria of the RECIST 1.1. Tumor responses showed a high level of concordance between the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1, with a kappa value of 0.912. Four patients (4.5%) showed disagreement of tumor responses between the two criteria, which were all due to the change of the LN criteria. Conclusion: The RECIST 1.1 showed a high level of concordance with the RECIST 1.0 in the assessment of tumor response in advanced NSCLC patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. The new LN criteria were the major cause of the reduction of target lesions and reclassification of the tumor response. Ivyspring International Publisher 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4466415/ /pubmed/26078796 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.11794 Text en © 2015 Ivyspring International Publisher. Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. See http://ivyspring.com/terms for terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Choi, Hyun Chang
Kim, Jung Han
Kim, Hyeong Su
Jung, Soong Goo
Hwang, Sang Muk
Ju, Sung Bae
Yang, Ik
Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
title Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
title_full Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
title_fullStr Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
title_short Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
title_sort comparison of the recist 1.0 and recist 1.1 in non-small cell lung cancer treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078796
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.11794
work_keys_str_mv AT choihyunchang comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy
AT kimjunghan comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy
AT kimhyeongsu comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy
AT jungsoonggoo comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy
AT hwangsangmuk comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy
AT jusungbae comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy
AT yangik comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy