Cargando…
Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
Background : The impact of the RECIST 1.1 on the selection of target lesions and assessment of tumor response was not evaluated in patients with advanced NSCLC who received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line chemothera...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ivyspring International Publisher
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078796 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.11794 |
_version_ | 1782376211472711680 |
---|---|
author | Choi, Hyun Chang Kim, Jung Han Kim, Hyeong Su Jung, Soong Goo Hwang, Sang Muk Ju, Sung Bae Yang, Ik |
author_facet | Choi, Hyun Chang Kim, Jung Han Kim, Hyeong Su Jung, Soong Goo Hwang, Sang Muk Ju, Sung Bae Yang, Ik |
author_sort | Choi, Hyun Chang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background : The impact of the RECIST 1.1 on the selection of target lesions and assessment of tumor response was not evaluated in patients with advanced NSCLC who received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line chemotherapy between January 2004 and December 2013 and compared the selection of target lesions and tumor responses using the two RECIST versions. Results: A total of 88 patients who had at least one target lesion according to the RECIST 1.0 were included in the study. The number of target lesions by the RECIST 1.1 was significantly lower than that by the RECIST 1.0. When adopting the RECIST 1.1 instead of the RECIST 1.0, 40 patients (45.4%) showed a decrease in the number of target lesions. Three patients no longer had target lesion because of the new lymph node (LN) criteria of the RECIST 1.1. Tumor responses showed a high level of concordance between the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1, with a kappa value of 0.912. Four patients (4.5%) showed disagreement of tumor responses between the two criteria, which were all due to the change of the LN criteria. Conclusion: The RECIST 1.1 showed a high level of concordance with the RECIST 1.0 in the assessment of tumor response in advanced NSCLC patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. The new LN criteria were the major cause of the reduction of target lesions and reclassification of the tumor response. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4466415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Ivyspring International Publisher |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44664152015-06-15 Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Choi, Hyun Chang Kim, Jung Han Kim, Hyeong Su Jung, Soong Goo Hwang, Sang Muk Ju, Sung Bae Yang, Ik J Cancer Research Paper Background : The impact of the RECIST 1.1 on the selection of target lesions and assessment of tumor response was not evaluated in patients with advanced NSCLC who received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who received first-line chemotherapy between January 2004 and December 2013 and compared the selection of target lesions and tumor responses using the two RECIST versions. Results: A total of 88 patients who had at least one target lesion according to the RECIST 1.0 were included in the study. The number of target lesions by the RECIST 1.1 was significantly lower than that by the RECIST 1.0. When adopting the RECIST 1.1 instead of the RECIST 1.0, 40 patients (45.4%) showed a decrease in the number of target lesions. Three patients no longer had target lesion because of the new lymph node (LN) criteria of the RECIST 1.1. Tumor responses showed a high level of concordance between the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1, with a kappa value of 0.912. Four patients (4.5%) showed disagreement of tumor responses between the two criteria, which were all due to the change of the LN criteria. Conclusion: The RECIST 1.1 showed a high level of concordance with the RECIST 1.0 in the assessment of tumor response in advanced NSCLC patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. The new LN criteria were the major cause of the reduction of target lesions and reclassification of the tumor response. Ivyspring International Publisher 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4466415/ /pubmed/26078796 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.11794 Text en © 2015 Ivyspring International Publisher. Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. See http://ivyspring.com/terms for terms and conditions. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Choi, Hyun Chang Kim, Jung Han Kim, Hyeong Su Jung, Soong Goo Hwang, Sang Muk Ju, Sung Bae Yang, Ik Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy |
title | Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy |
title_full | Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy |
title_short | Comparison of the RECIST 1.0 and RECIST 1.1 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy |
title_sort | comparison of the recist 1.0 and recist 1.1 in non-small cell lung cancer treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078796 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.11794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choihyunchang comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy AT kimjunghan comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy AT kimhyeongsu comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy AT jungsoonggoo comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy AT hwangsangmuk comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy AT jusungbae comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy AT yangik comparisonoftherecist10andrecist11innonsmallcelllungcancertreatedwithcytotoxicchemotherapy |