Cargando…
Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries
BACKGROUND: Although dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is known to standard equipment for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Different results of BMD measurement using a number of different types of devices are difficult to use clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082913 http://dx.doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2015.22.2.45 |
_version_ | 1782376215656529920 |
---|---|
author | Park, Ae Ja Choi, Jee-Hye Kang, Hyun Park, Ki Jeong Kim, Ha Young Kim, Seo Hwa Kim, Deog-Yoon Park, Seung-Hwan Ha, Yong-Chan |
author_facet | Park, Ae Ja Choi, Jee-Hye Kang, Hyun Park, Ki Jeong Kim, Ha Young Kim, Seo Hwa Kim, Deog-Yoon Park, Seung-Hwan Ha, Yong-Chan |
author_sort | Park, Ae Ja |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is known to standard equipment for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Different results of BMD measurement using a number of different types of devices are difficult to use clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate discrepancy and standardizations of DXA devices from three manufactures using a European Spine Phantom (ESP). METHODS: We calculated the accuracy and precision of 36 DXA devices from three manufacturers (10 Hologic, 16 Lunar, and 10 Osteosys) using a ESP (semi-anthropomorphic). The ESP was measured 5 times on each equipment without repositioning. Accuracy was assessed by comparing BMD (g/cm(2)) values measured on each device with the actual value of the phantom. Precision was assessed by the coefficient of variation (CVsd). RESULTS: Lunar devices were, on average, 22%, 8.3%, and 5% overestimation for low (L1) BMD values, medium (L2), and high (L3) BMD values. Hologic devices were, on average, 6% overestimation for L1 BMD, and 5% and 6.2% underestimation for L2 and L3 BMD values. Osteosys devices was, on average, 12.7% (0.063 g/cm(2)), 6.3% (0.062 g/cm(2)), and 5% (0.075 g/cm(2)) underestimation for L1, L2, and L3, respectively. The mean CVsd for L1-L3 BMD were 0.01%, 0.78%, and 2.46% for Lunar, Hologic, and Osteosys devices respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BMD comparison in this study demonstrates that BMD result of three different devices are significant different between three devices. Differences of BMD between three devices are necessary to BMD standardization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4466444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44664442015-06-16 Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries Park, Ae Ja Choi, Jee-Hye Kang, Hyun Park, Ki Jeong Kim, Ha Young Kim, Seo Hwa Kim, Deog-Yoon Park, Seung-Hwan Ha, Yong-Chan J Bone Metab Original Article BACKGROUND: Although dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is known to standard equipment for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. Different results of BMD measurement using a number of different types of devices are difficult to use clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate discrepancy and standardizations of DXA devices from three manufactures using a European Spine Phantom (ESP). METHODS: We calculated the accuracy and precision of 36 DXA devices from three manufacturers (10 Hologic, 16 Lunar, and 10 Osteosys) using a ESP (semi-anthropomorphic). The ESP was measured 5 times on each equipment without repositioning. Accuracy was assessed by comparing BMD (g/cm(2)) values measured on each device with the actual value of the phantom. Precision was assessed by the coefficient of variation (CVsd). RESULTS: Lunar devices were, on average, 22%, 8.3%, and 5% overestimation for low (L1) BMD values, medium (L2), and high (L3) BMD values. Hologic devices were, on average, 6% overestimation for L1 BMD, and 5% and 6.2% underestimation for L2 and L3 BMD values. Osteosys devices was, on average, 12.7% (0.063 g/cm(2)), 6.3% (0.062 g/cm(2)), and 5% (0.075 g/cm(2)) underestimation for L1, L2, and L3, respectively. The mean CVsd for L1-L3 BMD were 0.01%, 0.78%, and 2.46% for Lunar, Hologic, and Osteosys devices respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BMD comparison in this study demonstrates that BMD result of three different devices are significant different between three devices. Differences of BMD between three devices are necessary to BMD standardization. The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research 2015-05 2015-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4466444/ /pubmed/26082913 http://dx.doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2015.22.2.45 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, Ae Ja Choi, Jee-Hye Kang, Hyun Park, Ki Jeong Kim, Ha Young Kim, Seo Hwa Kim, Deog-Yoon Park, Seung-Hwan Ha, Yong-Chan Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries |
title | Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries |
title_full | Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries |
title_fullStr | Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries |
title_full_unstemmed | Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries |
title_short | Result of Proficiency Test and Comparison of Accuracy Using a European Spine Phantom among the Three Bone Densitometries |
title_sort | result of proficiency test and comparison of accuracy using a european spine phantom among the three bone densitometries |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082913 http://dx.doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2015.22.2.45 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkaeja resultofproficiencytestandcomparisonofaccuracyusingaeuropeanspinephantomamongthethreebonedensitometries AT choijeehye resultofproficiencytestandcomparisonofaccuracyusingaeuropeanspinephantomamongthethreebonedensitometries AT kanghyun resultofproficiencytestandcomparisonofaccuracyusingaeuropeanspinephantomamongthethreebonedensitometries AT parkkijeong resultofproficiencytestandcomparisonofaccuracyusingaeuropeanspinephantomamongthethreebonedensitometries AT kimhayoung resultofproficiencytestandcomparisonofaccuracyusingaeuropeanspinephantomamongthethreebonedensitometries AT kimseohwa resultofproficiencytestandcomparisonofaccuracyusingaeuropeanspinephantomamongthethreebonedensitometries AT kimdeogyoon resultofproficiencytestandcomparisonofaccuracyusingaeuropeanspinephantomamongthethreebonedensitometries AT parkseunghwan resultofproficiencytestandcomparisonofaccuracyusingaeuropeanspinephantomamongthethreebonedensitometries AT hayongchan resultofproficiencytestandcomparisonofaccuracyusingaeuropeanspinephantomamongthethreebonedensitometries |