Cargando…

Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators

INTRODUCTION: A growing number of medically complex older adults reside in long-term care (LTC) and often require physical rehabilitation (PR). While PR is effective at maintaining or improving a patient's physical function, the breadth of PR interventions evaluated in LTC, which outcomes or qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McArthur, Caitlin, Gibbs, Jenna, Papaioannou, Alexandra, Hirdes, John, Milligan, James, Berg, Katherine, Giangregorio, Lora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007528
_version_ 1782376253513269248
author McArthur, Caitlin
Gibbs, Jenna
Papaioannou, Alexandra
Hirdes, John
Milligan, James
Berg, Katherine
Giangregorio, Lora
author_facet McArthur, Caitlin
Gibbs, Jenna
Papaioannou, Alexandra
Hirdes, John
Milligan, James
Berg, Katherine
Giangregorio, Lora
author_sort McArthur, Caitlin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A growing number of medically complex older adults reside in long-term care (LTC) and often require physical rehabilitation (PR). While PR is effective at maintaining or improving a patient's physical function, the breadth of PR interventions evaluated in LTC, which outcomes or quality indicators (QI) can be used to evaluate PR, and what tools or models can be used to determine eligibility for PR services remain unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted to address the following research questions: (1) What types of PR have been evaluated for efficacy or effectiveness in LTC? (2) Which outcomes or QIs have been used when evaluating PR interventions in LTC, and how can this inform evaluation of PR using existing QIs in the Canadian context? (3) What tools or models exist or have been validated for decision-making in the allocation of PR resources in LTC? We will conduct a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence database (OTseeker) and a structured grey literature search. Two team members will screen articles and abstract the data. The results will be displayed according to the research question they address. Data abstracted regarding outcomes and QIs will be mapped onto existing, publicly reported QIs used in Ontario, Canada. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review will synthesise the characteristics of PR interventions described in the literature, the outcomes used to evaluate them and tools to determine eligibility for services. The review will be the first step in formally identifying what outcomes and QIs have been used to evaluate PR in LTC, and will be used to inform a stakeholder consensus process exploring the same question. The scoping review may also identify knowledge gaps. The results will be disseminated via publication and presentation at conferences, in addition to a 1-day stakeholder meeting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44666082015-06-17 Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators McArthur, Caitlin Gibbs, Jenna Papaioannou, Alexandra Hirdes, John Milligan, James Berg, Katherine Giangregorio, Lora BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: A growing number of medically complex older adults reside in long-term care (LTC) and often require physical rehabilitation (PR). While PR is effective at maintaining or improving a patient's physical function, the breadth of PR interventions evaluated in LTC, which outcomes or quality indicators (QI) can be used to evaluate PR, and what tools or models can be used to determine eligibility for PR services remain unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted to address the following research questions: (1) What types of PR have been evaluated for efficacy or effectiveness in LTC? (2) Which outcomes or QIs have been used when evaluating PR interventions in LTC, and how can this inform evaluation of PR using existing QIs in the Canadian context? (3) What tools or models exist or have been validated for decision-making in the allocation of PR resources in LTC? We will conduct a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence database (OTseeker) and a structured grey literature search. Two team members will screen articles and abstract the data. The results will be displayed according to the research question they address. Data abstracted regarding outcomes and QIs will be mapped onto existing, publicly reported QIs used in Ontario, Canada. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review will synthesise the characteristics of PR interventions described in the literature, the outcomes used to evaluate them and tools to determine eligibility for services. The review will be the first step in formally identifying what outcomes and QIs have been used to evaluate PR in LTC, and will be used to inform a stakeholder consensus process exploring the same question. The scoping review may also identify knowledge gaps. The results will be disseminated via publication and presentation at conferences, in addition to a 1-day stakeholder meeting. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4466608/ /pubmed/26056123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007528 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
McArthur, Caitlin
Gibbs, Jenna
Papaioannou, Alexandra
Hirdes, John
Milligan, James
Berg, Katherine
Giangregorio, Lora
Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators
title Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators
title_full Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators
title_fullStr Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators
title_full_unstemmed Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators
title_short Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators
title_sort scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007528
work_keys_str_mv AT mcarthurcaitlin scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators
AT gibbsjenna scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators
AT papaioannoualexandra scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators
AT hirdesjohn scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators
AT milliganjames scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators
AT bergkatherine scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators
AT giangregoriolora scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators