Cargando…
Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators
INTRODUCTION: A growing number of medically complex older adults reside in long-term care (LTC) and often require physical rehabilitation (PR). While PR is effective at maintaining or improving a patient's physical function, the breadth of PR interventions evaluated in LTC, which outcomes or qu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007528 |
_version_ | 1782376253513269248 |
---|---|
author | McArthur, Caitlin Gibbs, Jenna Papaioannou, Alexandra Hirdes, John Milligan, James Berg, Katherine Giangregorio, Lora |
author_facet | McArthur, Caitlin Gibbs, Jenna Papaioannou, Alexandra Hirdes, John Milligan, James Berg, Katherine Giangregorio, Lora |
author_sort | McArthur, Caitlin |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: A growing number of medically complex older adults reside in long-term care (LTC) and often require physical rehabilitation (PR). While PR is effective at maintaining or improving a patient's physical function, the breadth of PR interventions evaluated in LTC, which outcomes or quality indicators (QI) can be used to evaluate PR, and what tools or models can be used to determine eligibility for PR services remain unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted to address the following research questions: (1) What types of PR have been evaluated for efficacy or effectiveness in LTC? (2) Which outcomes or QIs have been used when evaluating PR interventions in LTC, and how can this inform evaluation of PR using existing QIs in the Canadian context? (3) What tools or models exist or have been validated for decision-making in the allocation of PR resources in LTC? We will conduct a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence database (OTseeker) and a structured grey literature search. Two team members will screen articles and abstract the data. The results will be displayed according to the research question they address. Data abstracted regarding outcomes and QIs will be mapped onto existing, publicly reported QIs used in Ontario, Canada. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review will synthesise the characteristics of PR interventions described in the literature, the outcomes used to evaluate them and tools to determine eligibility for services. The review will be the first step in formally identifying what outcomes and QIs have been used to evaluate PR in LTC, and will be used to inform a stakeholder consensus process exploring the same question. The scoping review may also identify knowledge gaps. The results will be disseminated via publication and presentation at conferences, in addition to a 1-day stakeholder meeting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4466608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44666082015-06-17 Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators McArthur, Caitlin Gibbs, Jenna Papaioannou, Alexandra Hirdes, John Milligan, James Berg, Katherine Giangregorio, Lora BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: A growing number of medically complex older adults reside in long-term care (LTC) and often require physical rehabilitation (PR). While PR is effective at maintaining or improving a patient's physical function, the breadth of PR interventions evaluated in LTC, which outcomes or quality indicators (QI) can be used to evaluate PR, and what tools or models can be used to determine eligibility for PR services remain unknown. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted to address the following research questions: (1) What types of PR have been evaluated for efficacy or effectiveness in LTC? (2) Which outcomes or QIs have been used when evaluating PR interventions in LTC, and how can this inform evaluation of PR using existing QIs in the Canadian context? (3) What tools or models exist or have been validated for decision-making in the allocation of PR resources in LTC? We will conduct a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence database (OTseeker) and a structured grey literature search. Two team members will screen articles and abstract the data. The results will be displayed according to the research question they address. Data abstracted regarding outcomes and QIs will be mapped onto existing, publicly reported QIs used in Ontario, Canada. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review will synthesise the characteristics of PR interventions described in the literature, the outcomes used to evaluate them and tools to determine eligibility for services. The review will be the first step in formally identifying what outcomes and QIs have been used to evaluate PR in LTC, and will be used to inform a stakeholder consensus process exploring the same question. The scoping review may also identify knowledge gaps. The results will be disseminated via publication and presentation at conferences, in addition to a 1-day stakeholder meeting. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4466608/ /pubmed/26056123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007528 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine McArthur, Caitlin Gibbs, Jenna Papaioannou, Alexandra Hirdes, John Milligan, James Berg, Katherine Giangregorio, Lora Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators |
title | Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators |
title_full | Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators |
title_fullStr | Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators |
title_full_unstemmed | Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators |
title_short | Scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators |
title_sort | scoping review of physical rehabilitation interventions in long-term care: protocol for tools, models of delivery, outcomes and quality indicators |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcarthurcaitlin scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators AT gibbsjenna scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators AT papaioannoualexandra scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators AT hirdesjohn scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators AT milliganjames scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators AT bergkatherine scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators AT giangregoriolora scopingreviewofphysicalrehabilitationinterventionsinlongtermcareprotocolfortoolsmodelsofdeliveryoutcomesandqualityindicators |