Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of second HIV test in pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Current strategy of single HIV test during pregnancy in India can miss new HIV infections acquired after the first test or those HIV infections that were missed in the first test due to a false-negative HIV test....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006718 |
_version_ | 1782376254917312512 |
---|---|
author | Joshi, Smita Kulkarni, Vinay Gangakhedkar, Raman Mahajan, Uma Sharma, Sushma Shirole, Devendra Chandhiok, Nomita |
author_facet | Joshi, Smita Kulkarni, Vinay Gangakhedkar, Raman Mahajan, Uma Sharma, Sushma Shirole, Devendra Chandhiok, Nomita |
author_sort | Joshi, Smita |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of second HIV test in pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Current strategy of single HIV test during pregnancy in India can miss new HIV infections acquired after the first test or those HIV infections that were missed in the first test due to a false-negative HIV test. METHODS: Between August 2011 and April 2013, 9097 pregnant HIV uninfected women were offered a second HIV test near term (34 weeks or beyond) or within 4 weeks of postpartum period. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate cost-effectiveness of a second HIV test in pregnant women near term. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: Our key outcome measures include programme cost with addition of second HIV test in pregnant women and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. RESULTS: We detected 4 new HIV infections in the second test. Thus HIV incidence among pregnant women was 0.12 (95% 0.032 to 0.297) per 100 person women years (PWY). Current strategy of a single HIV test is 8.2 times costlier for less QALYs gained as compared to proposed repeat HIV testing of pregnant women who test negative during the first test. CONCLUSIONS: Our results warrant consideration at the national level for including a second HIV test of all pregnant women in the national programme. However prior to allocation of resources for a second HIV test in pregnancy, appropriate strategies will have to be planned for improving compliance for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and reducing loss-to-follow-up of those women detected with HIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2013/12/004183. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4466614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44666142015-06-17 Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India Joshi, Smita Kulkarni, Vinay Gangakhedkar, Raman Mahajan, Uma Sharma, Sushma Shirole, Devendra Chandhiok, Nomita BMJ Open HIV/AIDS OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of second HIV test in pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Current strategy of single HIV test during pregnancy in India can miss new HIV infections acquired after the first test or those HIV infections that were missed in the first test due to a false-negative HIV test. METHODS: Between August 2011 and April 2013, 9097 pregnant HIV uninfected women were offered a second HIV test near term (34 weeks or beyond) or within 4 weeks of postpartum period. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate cost-effectiveness of a second HIV test in pregnant women near term. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: Our key outcome measures include programme cost with addition of second HIV test in pregnant women and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. RESULTS: We detected 4 new HIV infections in the second test. Thus HIV incidence among pregnant women was 0.12 (95% 0.032 to 0.297) per 100 person women years (PWY). Current strategy of a single HIV test is 8.2 times costlier for less QALYs gained as compared to proposed repeat HIV testing of pregnant women who test negative during the first test. CONCLUSIONS: Our results warrant consideration at the national level for including a second HIV test of all pregnant women in the national programme. However prior to allocation of resources for a second HIV test in pregnancy, appropriate strategies will have to be planned for improving compliance for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and reducing loss-to-follow-up of those women detected with HIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2013/12/004183. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4466614/ /pubmed/26068507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006718 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | HIV/AIDS Joshi, Smita Kulkarni, Vinay Gangakhedkar, Raman Mahajan, Uma Sharma, Sushma Shirole, Devendra Chandhiok, Nomita Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India |
title | Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of a repeat hiv test in pregnancy in india |
topic | HIV/AIDS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006718 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joshismita costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia AT kulkarnivinay costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia AT gangakhedkarraman costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia AT mahajanuma costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia AT sharmasushma costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia AT shiroledevendra costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia AT chandhioknomita costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia |