Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of second HIV test in pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Current strategy of single HIV test during pregnancy in India can miss new HIV infections acquired after the first test or those HIV infections that were missed in the first test due to a false-negative HIV test....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Joshi, Smita, Kulkarni, Vinay, Gangakhedkar, Raman, Mahajan, Uma, Sharma, Sushma, Shirole, Devendra, Chandhiok, Nomita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006718
_version_ 1782376254917312512
author Joshi, Smita
Kulkarni, Vinay
Gangakhedkar, Raman
Mahajan, Uma
Sharma, Sushma
Shirole, Devendra
Chandhiok, Nomita
author_facet Joshi, Smita
Kulkarni, Vinay
Gangakhedkar, Raman
Mahajan, Uma
Sharma, Sushma
Shirole, Devendra
Chandhiok, Nomita
author_sort Joshi, Smita
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of second HIV test in pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Current strategy of single HIV test during pregnancy in India can miss new HIV infections acquired after the first test or those HIV infections that were missed in the first test due to a false-negative HIV test. METHODS: Between August 2011 and April 2013, 9097 pregnant HIV uninfected women were offered a second HIV test near term (34 weeks or beyond) or within 4 weeks of postpartum period. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate cost-effectiveness of a second HIV test in pregnant women near term. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: Our key outcome measures include programme cost with addition of second HIV test in pregnant women and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. RESULTS: We detected 4 new HIV infections in the second test. Thus HIV incidence among pregnant women was 0.12 (95% 0.032 to 0.297) per 100 person women years (PWY). Current strategy of a single HIV test is 8.2 times costlier for less QALYs gained as compared to proposed repeat HIV testing of pregnant women who test negative during the first test. CONCLUSIONS: Our results warrant consideration at the national level for including a second HIV test of all pregnant women in the national programme. However prior to allocation of resources for a second HIV test in pregnancy, appropriate strategies will have to be planned for improving compliance for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and reducing loss-to-follow-up of those women detected with HIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2013/12/004183.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44666142015-06-17 Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India Joshi, Smita Kulkarni, Vinay Gangakhedkar, Raman Mahajan, Uma Sharma, Sushma Shirole, Devendra Chandhiok, Nomita BMJ Open HIV/AIDS OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of second HIV test in pregnancy. BACKGROUND: Current strategy of single HIV test during pregnancy in India can miss new HIV infections acquired after the first test or those HIV infections that were missed in the first test due to a false-negative HIV test. METHODS: Between August 2011 and April 2013, 9097 pregnant HIV uninfected women were offered a second HIV test near term (34 weeks or beyond) or within 4 weeks of postpartum period. A decision analysis model was used to evaluate cost-effectiveness of a second HIV test in pregnant women near term. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: Our key outcome measures include programme cost with addition of second HIV test in pregnant women and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. RESULTS: We detected 4 new HIV infections in the second test. Thus HIV incidence among pregnant women was 0.12 (95% 0.032 to 0.297) per 100 person women years (PWY). Current strategy of a single HIV test is 8.2 times costlier for less QALYs gained as compared to proposed repeat HIV testing of pregnant women who test negative during the first test. CONCLUSIONS: Our results warrant consideration at the national level for including a second HIV test of all pregnant women in the national programme. However prior to allocation of resources for a second HIV test in pregnancy, appropriate strategies will have to be planned for improving compliance for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and reducing loss-to-follow-up of those women detected with HIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2013/12/004183. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4466614/ /pubmed/26068507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006718 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle HIV/AIDS
Joshi, Smita
Kulkarni, Vinay
Gangakhedkar, Raman
Mahajan, Uma
Sharma, Sushma
Shirole, Devendra
Chandhiok, Nomita
Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India
title Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a repeat HIV test in pregnancy in India
title_sort cost-effectiveness of a repeat hiv test in pregnancy in india
topic HIV/AIDS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006718
work_keys_str_mv AT joshismita costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia
AT kulkarnivinay costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia
AT gangakhedkarraman costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia
AT mahajanuma costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia
AT sharmasushma costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia
AT shiroledevendra costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia
AT chandhioknomita costeffectivenessofarepeathivtestinpregnancyinindia