Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners delivering primary and specialised ambulatory care. DESIGN: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials reported since 1980. DATA SOURCES: 10 electronic bibliographic databases, handsearches, contact with authors, bibliogr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007167 |
_version_ | 1782376279131029504 |
---|---|
author | Martin-Misener, Ruth Harbman, Patricia Donald, Faith Reid, Kim Kilpatrick, Kelley Carter, Nancy Bryant-Lukosius, Denise Kaasalainen, Sharon Marshall, Deborah A Charbonneau-Smith, Renee DiCenso, Alba |
author_facet | Martin-Misener, Ruth Harbman, Patricia Donald, Faith Reid, Kim Kilpatrick, Kelley Carter, Nancy Bryant-Lukosius, Denise Kaasalainen, Sharon Marshall, Deborah A Charbonneau-Smith, Renee DiCenso, Alba |
author_sort | Martin-Misener, Ruth |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners delivering primary and specialised ambulatory care. DESIGN: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials reported since 1980. DATA SOURCES: 10 electronic bibliographic databases, handsearches, contact with authors, bibliographies and websites. INCLUDED STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials that evaluated nurse practitioners in alternative and complementary ambulatory care roles and reported health system outcomes. RESULTS: 11 trials were included. In four trials of alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but seven patient outcomes favouring nurse practitioner care and in all but four health system outcomes, one favouring nurse practitioner care and three favouring physician care. In a meta-analysis of two studies (2689 patients) with minimal heterogeneity and high-quality evidence, nurse practitioner care resulted in lower mean health services costs per consultation (mean difference: −€6.41; 95% CI −€9.28 to −€3.55; p<0.0001) (2006 euros). In two trials of alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but three patient outcomes and one health system outcome favouring nurse practitioner care. In five trials of complementary provider specialised ambulatory care roles, 16 patient/provider outcomes favouring nurse practitioner plus usual care, and 16 were equivalent. Two health system outcomes favoured nurse practitioner plus usual care, four favoured usual care and 14 were equivalent. Four studies of complementary specialised ambulatory care compared costs, but only one assessed costs and outcomes jointly. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioners in alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles have equivalent or better patient outcomes than comparators and are potentially cost-saving. Evidence for their cost-effectiveness in alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles is promising, but limited by the few studies. While some evidence indicates nurse practitioners in complementary specialised ambulatory care roles improve patient outcomes, their cost-effectiveness requires further study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4466759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44667592015-06-17 Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review Martin-Misener, Ruth Harbman, Patricia Donald, Faith Reid, Kim Kilpatrick, Kelley Carter, Nancy Bryant-Lukosius, Denise Kaasalainen, Sharon Marshall, Deborah A Charbonneau-Smith, Renee DiCenso, Alba BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners delivering primary and specialised ambulatory care. DESIGN: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials reported since 1980. DATA SOURCES: 10 electronic bibliographic databases, handsearches, contact with authors, bibliographies and websites. INCLUDED STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials that evaluated nurse practitioners in alternative and complementary ambulatory care roles and reported health system outcomes. RESULTS: 11 trials were included. In four trials of alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but seven patient outcomes favouring nurse practitioner care and in all but four health system outcomes, one favouring nurse practitioner care and three favouring physician care. In a meta-analysis of two studies (2689 patients) with minimal heterogeneity and high-quality evidence, nurse practitioner care resulted in lower mean health services costs per consultation (mean difference: −€6.41; 95% CI −€9.28 to −€3.55; p<0.0001) (2006 euros). In two trials of alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but three patient outcomes and one health system outcome favouring nurse practitioner care. In five trials of complementary provider specialised ambulatory care roles, 16 patient/provider outcomes favouring nurse practitioner plus usual care, and 16 were equivalent. Two health system outcomes favoured nurse practitioner plus usual care, four favoured usual care and 14 were equivalent. Four studies of complementary specialised ambulatory care compared costs, but only one assessed costs and outcomes jointly. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioners in alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles have equivalent or better patient outcomes than comparators and are potentially cost-saving. Evidence for their cost-effectiveness in alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles is promising, but limited by the few studies. While some evidence indicates nurse practitioners in complementary specialised ambulatory care roles improve patient outcomes, their cost-effectiveness requires further study. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4466759/ /pubmed/26056121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007167 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Nursing Martin-Misener, Ruth Harbman, Patricia Donald, Faith Reid, Kim Kilpatrick, Kelley Carter, Nancy Bryant-Lukosius, Denise Kaasalainen, Sharon Marshall, Deborah A Charbonneau-Smith, Renee DiCenso, Alba Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review |
title | Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review |
topic | Nursing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinmisenerruth costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT harbmanpatricia costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT donaldfaith costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT reidkim costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT kilpatrickkelley costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT carternancy costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT bryantlukosiusdenise costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT kaasalainensharon costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT marshalldeboraha costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT charbonneausmithrenee costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview AT dicensoalba costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview |