Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners delivering primary and specialised ambulatory care. DESIGN: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials reported since 1980. DATA SOURCES: 10 electronic bibliographic databases, handsearches, contact with authors, bibliogr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin-Misener, Ruth, Harbman, Patricia, Donald, Faith, Reid, Kim, Kilpatrick, Kelley, Carter, Nancy, Bryant-Lukosius, Denise, Kaasalainen, Sharon, Marshall, Deborah A, Charbonneau-Smith, Renee, DiCenso, Alba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007167
_version_ 1782376279131029504
author Martin-Misener, Ruth
Harbman, Patricia
Donald, Faith
Reid, Kim
Kilpatrick, Kelley
Carter, Nancy
Bryant-Lukosius, Denise
Kaasalainen, Sharon
Marshall, Deborah A
Charbonneau-Smith, Renee
DiCenso, Alba
author_facet Martin-Misener, Ruth
Harbman, Patricia
Donald, Faith
Reid, Kim
Kilpatrick, Kelley
Carter, Nancy
Bryant-Lukosius, Denise
Kaasalainen, Sharon
Marshall, Deborah A
Charbonneau-Smith, Renee
DiCenso, Alba
author_sort Martin-Misener, Ruth
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners delivering primary and specialised ambulatory care. DESIGN: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials reported since 1980. DATA SOURCES: 10 electronic bibliographic databases, handsearches, contact with authors, bibliographies and websites. INCLUDED STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials that evaluated nurse practitioners in alternative and complementary ambulatory care roles and reported health system outcomes. RESULTS: 11 trials were included. In four trials of alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but seven patient outcomes favouring nurse practitioner care and in all but four health system outcomes, one favouring nurse practitioner care and three favouring physician care. In a meta-analysis of two studies (2689 patients) with minimal heterogeneity and high-quality evidence, nurse practitioner care resulted in lower mean health services costs per consultation (mean difference: −€6.41; 95% CI −€9.28 to −€3.55; p<0.0001) (2006 euros). In two trials of alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but three patient outcomes and one health system outcome favouring nurse practitioner care. In five trials of complementary provider specialised ambulatory care roles, 16 patient/provider outcomes favouring nurse practitioner plus usual care, and 16 were equivalent. Two health system outcomes favoured nurse practitioner plus usual care, four favoured usual care and 14 were equivalent. Four studies of complementary specialised ambulatory care compared costs, but only one assessed costs and outcomes jointly. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioners in alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles have equivalent or better patient outcomes than comparators and are potentially cost-saving. Evidence for their cost-effectiveness in alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles is promising, but limited by the few studies. While some evidence indicates nurse practitioners in complementary specialised ambulatory care roles improve patient outcomes, their cost-effectiveness requires further study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44667592015-06-17 Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review Martin-Misener, Ruth Harbman, Patricia Donald, Faith Reid, Kim Kilpatrick, Kelley Carter, Nancy Bryant-Lukosius, Denise Kaasalainen, Sharon Marshall, Deborah A Charbonneau-Smith, Renee DiCenso, Alba BMJ Open Nursing OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners delivering primary and specialised ambulatory care. DESIGN: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials reported since 1980. DATA SOURCES: 10 electronic bibliographic databases, handsearches, contact with authors, bibliographies and websites. INCLUDED STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials that evaluated nurse practitioners in alternative and complementary ambulatory care roles and reported health system outcomes. RESULTS: 11 trials were included. In four trials of alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but seven patient outcomes favouring nurse practitioner care and in all but four health system outcomes, one favouring nurse practitioner care and three favouring physician care. In a meta-analysis of two studies (2689 patients) with minimal heterogeneity and high-quality evidence, nurse practitioner care resulted in lower mean health services costs per consultation (mean difference: −€6.41; 95% CI −€9.28 to −€3.55; p<0.0001) (2006 euros). In two trials of alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but three patient outcomes and one health system outcome favouring nurse practitioner care. In five trials of complementary provider specialised ambulatory care roles, 16 patient/provider outcomes favouring nurse practitioner plus usual care, and 16 were equivalent. Two health system outcomes favoured nurse practitioner plus usual care, four favoured usual care and 14 were equivalent. Four studies of complementary specialised ambulatory care compared costs, but only one assessed costs and outcomes jointly. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioners in alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles have equivalent or better patient outcomes than comparators and are potentially cost-saving. Evidence for their cost-effectiveness in alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles is promising, but limited by the few studies. While some evidence indicates nurse practitioners in complementary specialised ambulatory care roles improve patient outcomes, their cost-effectiveness requires further study. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4466759/ /pubmed/26056121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007167 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Nursing
Martin-Misener, Ruth
Harbman, Patricia
Donald, Faith
Reid, Kim
Kilpatrick, Kelley
Carter, Nancy
Bryant-Lukosius, Denise
Kaasalainen, Sharon
Marshall, Deborah A
Charbonneau-Smith, Renee
DiCenso, Alba
Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review
title Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review
title_full Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review
title_short Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review
title_sort cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26056121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007167
work_keys_str_mv AT martinmisenerruth costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT harbmanpatricia costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT donaldfaith costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT reidkim costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT kilpatrickkelley costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT carternancy costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT bryantlukosiusdenise costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT kaasalainensharon costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT marshalldeboraha costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT charbonneausmithrenee costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview
AT dicensoalba costeffectivenessofnursepractitionersinprimaryandspecialisedambulatorycaresystematicreview