Cargando…

Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation

BACKGROUND: The use of digital whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) could create improvements in workflow and performance, allowing for central archiving of specimens, distributed and remote interpretation, and the potential for additiona...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilbur, David C., Brachtel, Elena F., Gilbertson, John R., Jones, Nicholas C., Vallone, John G., Krishnamurthy, Savitra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26110090
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.157788
_version_ 1782376286288609280
author Wilbur, David C.
Brachtel, Elena F.
Gilbertson, John R.
Jones, Nicholas C.
Vallone, John G.
Krishnamurthy, Savitra
author_facet Wilbur, David C.
Brachtel, Elena F.
Gilbertson, John R.
Jones, Nicholas C.
Vallone, John G.
Krishnamurthy, Savitra
author_sort Wilbur, David C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of digital whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) could create improvements in workflow and performance, allowing for central archiving of specimens, distributed and remote interpretation, and the potential for additional computerized automation. PROCEDURES: The accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of manual digital interpretation for HER2 IHC were determined by comparison to manual glass slide interpretation. Inter- and intra-pathologist reproducibility and precision between the glass slide and digital interpretations of HER2 IHC were determined in 5 studies using DAKO HercepTest-stained breast cancer slides with the Philips Digital Pathology System. In 2 inter-method studies, 3 pathologists interpreted glass and digital slides in sequence or in random order with a minimum of 7 days as a washout period. These studies also measured inter-observer reproducibility and precision. Another two studies measured intra-pathologist reproducibility on cases read 10 times by glass and digital methods. One additional study evaluated the effects of adding IHC control slides with each run, using 1 pathologist interpreting glass and digital slides randomized from the sets above along with appropriate controls for each slide in the set. RESULTS: The overall results show that there is no statistical difference between the variance of performance when comparing glass and digital HER2 interpretations; and there were no effects noted when control tissues were evaluated in conjunction with the test slides. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that there is an equivalence of result when interpreting HER2 IHC slides in breast cancer by either glass slides or digital images. Digital interpretation can therefore be safely and effectively used for this purpose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44667892015-06-24 Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation Wilbur, David C. Brachtel, Elena F. Gilbertson, John R. Jones, Nicholas C. Vallone, John G. Krishnamurthy, Savitra J Pathol Inform Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of digital whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) could create improvements in workflow and performance, allowing for central archiving of specimens, distributed and remote interpretation, and the potential for additional computerized automation. PROCEDURES: The accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of manual digital interpretation for HER2 IHC were determined by comparison to manual glass slide interpretation. Inter- and intra-pathologist reproducibility and precision between the glass slide and digital interpretations of HER2 IHC were determined in 5 studies using DAKO HercepTest-stained breast cancer slides with the Philips Digital Pathology System. In 2 inter-method studies, 3 pathologists interpreted glass and digital slides in sequence or in random order with a minimum of 7 days as a washout period. These studies also measured inter-observer reproducibility and precision. Another two studies measured intra-pathologist reproducibility on cases read 10 times by glass and digital methods. One additional study evaluated the effects of adding IHC control slides with each run, using 1 pathologist interpreting glass and digital slides randomized from the sets above along with appropriate controls for each slide in the set. RESULTS: The overall results show that there is no statistical difference between the variance of performance when comparing glass and digital HER2 interpretations; and there were no effects noted when control tissues were evaluated in conjunction with the test slides. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that there is an equivalence of result when interpreting HER2 IHC slides in breast cancer by either glass slides or digital images. Digital interpretation can therefore be safely and effectively used for this purpose. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4466789/ /pubmed/26110090 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.157788 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Wilbur DC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wilbur, David C.
Brachtel, Elena F.
Gilbertson, John R.
Jones, Nicholas C.
Vallone, John G.
Krishnamurthy, Savitra
Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation
title Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation
title_full Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation
title_fullStr Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation
title_short Whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: Accuracy, Precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation
title_sort whole slide imaging for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry interpretation: accuracy, precision, and reproducibility studies for digital manual and paired glass slide manual interpretation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26110090
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.157788
work_keys_str_mv AT wilburdavidc wholeslideimagingforhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2immunohistochemistryinterpretationaccuracyprecisionandreproducibilitystudiesfordigitalmanualandpairedglassslidemanualinterpretation
AT brachtelelenaf wholeslideimagingforhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2immunohistochemistryinterpretationaccuracyprecisionandreproducibilitystudiesfordigitalmanualandpairedglassslidemanualinterpretation
AT gilbertsonjohnr wholeslideimagingforhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2immunohistochemistryinterpretationaccuracyprecisionandreproducibilitystudiesfordigitalmanualandpairedglassslidemanualinterpretation
AT jonesnicholasc wholeslideimagingforhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2immunohistochemistryinterpretationaccuracyprecisionandreproducibilitystudiesfordigitalmanualandpairedglassslidemanualinterpretation
AT vallonejohng wholeslideimagingforhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2immunohistochemistryinterpretationaccuracyprecisionandreproducibilitystudiesfordigitalmanualandpairedglassslidemanualinterpretation
AT krishnamurthysavitra wholeslideimagingforhumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2immunohistochemistryinterpretationaccuracyprecisionandreproducibilitystudiesfordigitalmanualandpairedglassslidemanualinterpretation