Cargando…

Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey

BACKGROUND: Electro-physical agents (EPAs) are fundamental components in the management arsenal of physiotherapy. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting the decisions made by Physiotherapists (PTs) when choosing to apply EPAs as a treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Springer, Shmuel, Laufer, Yocheved, Elboim-Gabyzon, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-015-0015-x
_version_ 1782376289520320512
author Springer, Shmuel
Laufer, Yocheved
Elboim-Gabyzon, Michal
author_facet Springer, Shmuel
Laufer, Yocheved
Elboim-Gabyzon, Michal
author_sort Springer, Shmuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electro-physical agents (EPAs) are fundamental components in the management arsenal of physiotherapy. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting the decisions made by Physiotherapists (PTs) when choosing to apply EPAs as a treatment modality. METHODS: A purpose-designed questionnaire was developed to investigate the contribution of 13 factors on the decision to use EPAs. Two hundred questionnaires were randomly distributed to PTs attending the annual conference of the Israeli Physiotherapy Society, 2014. The factors were grouped into six categories and Wilcoxon Sign Rank tests were applied to compare their impact on decision making. RESULTS: In total, 144 (72%) questionnaires were completed. Good internal consistency was found for the 13 component of the decisions factors (Cronbach’s coefficient alpha = 0.77) with unequal distribution of answers in each question (p < 0.01). Eighty-one percent of the participants reported past experience, and 55 % mentioned research evidence as strong or very strong factors which influence their decision to use of EPAs. However, only 38% of the participants reported patients’ preferences as a strong or very strong factor. Comparisons between the six categories of the decision factors determined three levels of impact (rank scores) which were significantly different from each other (p < 0.01). Availability of equipment ranked the highest. The lowest level of impact included two categories, technology related issues and patients’ and physicians’ preferences. CONCLUSION: The participating PTs were likely to make decisions which were strongly impacted by availability of equipment and operational factors. This research can be used to provide practicing PTs with a basis for a critical appraisal of their decision making regarding the application of EAPs. In addition, due to the strong impact of availability of equipment, health policy makers should verify that the available equipment is up to date with the best research evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44668042015-06-16 Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey Springer, Shmuel Laufer, Yocheved Elboim-Gabyzon, Michal Isr J Health Policy Res Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Electro-physical agents (EPAs) are fundamental components in the management arsenal of physiotherapy. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting the decisions made by Physiotherapists (PTs) when choosing to apply EPAs as a treatment modality. METHODS: A purpose-designed questionnaire was developed to investigate the contribution of 13 factors on the decision to use EPAs. Two hundred questionnaires were randomly distributed to PTs attending the annual conference of the Israeli Physiotherapy Society, 2014. The factors were grouped into six categories and Wilcoxon Sign Rank tests were applied to compare their impact on decision making. RESULTS: In total, 144 (72%) questionnaires were completed. Good internal consistency was found for the 13 component of the decisions factors (Cronbach’s coefficient alpha = 0.77) with unequal distribution of answers in each question (p < 0.01). Eighty-one percent of the participants reported past experience, and 55 % mentioned research evidence as strong or very strong factors which influence their decision to use of EPAs. However, only 38% of the participants reported patients’ preferences as a strong or very strong factor. Comparisons between the six categories of the decision factors determined three levels of impact (rank scores) which were significantly different from each other (p < 0.01). Availability of equipment ranked the highest. The lowest level of impact included two categories, technology related issues and patients’ and physicians’ preferences. CONCLUSION: The participating PTs were likely to make decisions which were strongly impacted by availability of equipment and operational factors. This research can be used to provide practicing PTs with a basis for a critical appraisal of their decision making regarding the application of EAPs. In addition, due to the strong impact of availability of equipment, health policy makers should verify that the available equipment is up to date with the best research evidence. BioMed Central 2015-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4466804/ /pubmed/26078848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-015-0015-x Text en © Springer et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Springer, Shmuel
Laufer, Yocheved
Elboim-Gabyzon, Michal
Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey
title Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey
title_full Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey
title_fullStr Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey
title_full_unstemmed Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey
title_short Clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an Israeli survey
title_sort clinical decision making for using electro-physical agents by physiotherapists, an israeli survey
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13584-015-0015-x
work_keys_str_mv AT springershmuel clinicaldecisionmakingforusingelectrophysicalagentsbyphysiotherapistsanisraelisurvey
AT lauferyocheved clinicaldecisionmakingforusingelectrophysicalagentsbyphysiotherapistsanisraelisurvey
AT elboimgabyzonmichal clinicaldecisionmakingforusingelectrophysicalagentsbyphysiotherapistsanisraelisurvey