Cargando…

In a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec task force classification system were typically small – a longitudinal study

BACKGROUND: The component of the Quebec Task Force Classification System that subgroups patients based on the extent of their radiating pain and neurological signs has been demonstrated to have prognostic implications for patients with low back pain but has not been tested on patients with neck pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Hanne, Kent, Peter, Kjaer, Per, Kongsted, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26076972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0609-z
_version_ 1782376290228109312
author Rasmussen, Hanne
Kent, Peter
Kjaer, Per
Kongsted, Alice
author_facet Rasmussen, Hanne
Kent, Peter
Kjaer, Per
Kongsted, Alice
author_sort Rasmussen, Hanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The component of the Quebec Task Force Classification System that subgroups patients based on the extent of their radiating pain and neurological signs has been demonstrated to have prognostic implications for patients with low back pain but has not been tested on patients with neck pain (NP). The main aim of this study was to examine the association between these subgroups, their baseline characteristics and outcome in chronic NP patients referred to an outpatient hospital department. METHODS: This was an observational study of longitudinal data extracted from systematically collected, routine clinical data. Patients were classified into Local NP only, NP + arm pain above the elbow, NP + arm pain below the elbow, and NP with signs of nerve root involvement (NP + NRI). Outcome was pain intensity and activity limitation. Associations were tested in longitudinal linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 1,852 people were classified into subgroups (64 % females, mean age 49 years). Follow ups after 3, 6 and 12 months were available for 45 %, 32 % and 40 % of those invited to participate at each time point. A small improvement in pain was observed over time in all subgroups. There was a significant interaction between subgroups and time, but effect sizes were small. The local NP subgroup improved slightly less after 3 months as compared with all other groups, but continued to have the lowest level of pain. After 6 and 12 months, those with NP + pain above the elbow had improved the least and patients with NP + NRI had experienced the largest improvements in pain intensity. Similar results were obtained for activity limitation. CONCLUSIONS: This study found baseline and outcome differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec Task Force Classification System. However, differences in outcome were typically small in size and mostly differentiated the local NP subgroup from the other subgroups. A caveat to these results is that they were obtained in a cohort of chronic neck pain patients who only displayed small improvements over time and the results may not apply to other cohorts, such as people at earlier stages of their clinical course and in other clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44668082015-06-16 In a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec task force classification system were typically small – a longitudinal study Rasmussen, Hanne Kent, Peter Kjaer, Per Kongsted, Alice BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The component of the Quebec Task Force Classification System that subgroups patients based on the extent of their radiating pain and neurological signs has been demonstrated to have prognostic implications for patients with low back pain but has not been tested on patients with neck pain (NP). The main aim of this study was to examine the association between these subgroups, their baseline characteristics and outcome in chronic NP patients referred to an outpatient hospital department. METHODS: This was an observational study of longitudinal data extracted from systematically collected, routine clinical data. Patients were classified into Local NP only, NP + arm pain above the elbow, NP + arm pain below the elbow, and NP with signs of nerve root involvement (NP + NRI). Outcome was pain intensity and activity limitation. Associations were tested in longitudinal linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total of 1,852 people were classified into subgroups (64 % females, mean age 49 years). Follow ups after 3, 6 and 12 months were available for 45 %, 32 % and 40 % of those invited to participate at each time point. A small improvement in pain was observed over time in all subgroups. There was a significant interaction between subgroups and time, but effect sizes were small. The local NP subgroup improved slightly less after 3 months as compared with all other groups, but continued to have the lowest level of pain. After 6 and 12 months, those with NP + pain above the elbow had improved the least and patients with NP + NRI had experienced the largest improvements in pain intensity. Similar results were obtained for activity limitation. CONCLUSIONS: This study found baseline and outcome differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec Task Force Classification System. However, differences in outcome were typically small in size and mostly differentiated the local NP subgroup from the other subgroups. A caveat to these results is that they were obtained in a cohort of chronic neck pain patients who only displayed small improvements over time and the results may not apply to other cohorts, such as people at earlier stages of their clinical course and in other clinical settings. BioMed Central 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4466808/ /pubmed/26076972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0609-z Text en © Rasmussen et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rasmussen, Hanne
Kent, Peter
Kjaer, Per
Kongsted, Alice
In a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec task force classification system were typically small – a longitudinal study
title In a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec task force classification system were typically small – a longitudinal study
title_full In a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec task force classification system were typically small – a longitudinal study
title_fullStr In a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec task force classification system were typically small – a longitudinal study
title_full_unstemmed In a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec task force classification system were typically small – a longitudinal study
title_short In a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the Quebec task force classification system were typically small – a longitudinal study
title_sort in a secondary care setting, differences between neck pain subgroups classified using the quebec task force classification system were typically small – a longitudinal study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26076972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0609-z
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussenhanne inasecondarycaresettingdifferencesbetweenneckpainsubgroupsclassifiedusingthequebectaskforceclassificationsystemweretypicallysmallalongitudinalstudy
AT kentpeter inasecondarycaresettingdifferencesbetweenneckpainsubgroupsclassifiedusingthequebectaskforceclassificationsystemweretypicallysmallalongitudinalstudy
AT kjaerper inasecondarycaresettingdifferencesbetweenneckpainsubgroupsclassifiedusingthequebectaskforceclassificationsystemweretypicallysmallalongitudinalstudy
AT kongstedalice inasecondarycaresettingdifferencesbetweenneckpainsubgroupsclassifiedusingthequebectaskforceclassificationsystemweretypicallysmallalongitudinalstudy