Cargando…
Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines and consensus recommend arterial and venous samples as equally acceptable for blood glucose assessment in point-of-care devices, but there is limited evidence to support this recommendation. We evaluated the accuracy of two devices for bedside point-of-care blood glu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129568 |
_version_ | 1782376305173463040 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Adriano José Corrêa, Thiago Domingos de Almeida, Francisca Pereira Deliberato, Rodrigo Octávio Lobato, Michelle dos Santos Akamine, Nelson Silva, Eliézer Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi |
author_facet | Pereira, Adriano José Corrêa, Thiago Domingos de Almeida, Francisca Pereira Deliberato, Rodrigo Octávio Lobato, Michelle dos Santos Akamine, Nelson Silva, Eliézer Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi |
author_sort | Pereira, Adriano José |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines and consensus recommend arterial and venous samples as equally acceptable for blood glucose assessment in point-of-care devices, but there is limited evidence to support this recommendation. We evaluated the accuracy of two devices for bedside point-of-care blood glucose measurements using arterial, fingerstick and catheter venous blood samples in ICU patients, and assessed which factors could impair their accuracy. METHODS: 145 patients from a 41-bed adult mixed-ICU, in a tertiary care hospital were prospectively enrolled. Fingerstick, central venous (catheter) and arterial blood (indwelling catheter) samples were simultaneously collected, once per patient. Arterial measurements obtained with Precision PCx, and arterial, fingerstick and venous measurements obtained with Accu-chek Advantage II were compared to arterial central lab measurements. Agreement between point-of-care and laboratory measurements were evaluated with Bland-Altman, and multiple linear regression models were used to investigate interference of associated factors. RESULTS: Mean difference between Accu-chek arterial samples versus central lab was 10.7 mg/dL (95% LA -21.3 to 42.7 mg/dL), and between Precision PCx versus central lab was 18.6 mg/dL (95% LA -12.6 to 49.5 mg/dL). Accu-chek fingerstick versus central lab arterial samples presented a similar bias (10.0 mg/dL) but a wider 95% LA (-31.8 to 51.8 mg/dL). Agreement between venous samples with arterial central lab was the poorest (mean bias 15.1 mg/dL; 95% LA -51.7 to 81.9). Hyperglycemia, low hematocrit, and acidosis were associated with larger differences between arterial and venous blood measurements with the two glucometers and central lab. Vasopressor administration was associated with increased error for fingerstick measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Sampling from central venous catheters should not be used for glycemic control in ICU patients. In addition, reliability of the two evaluated glucometers was insufficient. Error with Accu-chek Advantage II increases mostly with central venous samples. Hyperglycemia, lower hematocrit, acidosis, and vasopressor administration increase measurement error. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4466904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44669042015-06-22 Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study Pereira, Adriano José Corrêa, Thiago Domingos de Almeida, Francisca Pereira Deliberato, Rodrigo Octávio Lobato, Michelle dos Santos Akamine, Nelson Silva, Eliézer Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines and consensus recommend arterial and venous samples as equally acceptable for blood glucose assessment in point-of-care devices, but there is limited evidence to support this recommendation. We evaluated the accuracy of two devices for bedside point-of-care blood glucose measurements using arterial, fingerstick and catheter venous blood samples in ICU patients, and assessed which factors could impair their accuracy. METHODS: 145 patients from a 41-bed adult mixed-ICU, in a tertiary care hospital were prospectively enrolled. Fingerstick, central venous (catheter) and arterial blood (indwelling catheter) samples were simultaneously collected, once per patient. Arterial measurements obtained with Precision PCx, and arterial, fingerstick and venous measurements obtained with Accu-chek Advantage II were compared to arterial central lab measurements. Agreement between point-of-care and laboratory measurements were evaluated with Bland-Altman, and multiple linear regression models were used to investigate interference of associated factors. RESULTS: Mean difference between Accu-chek arterial samples versus central lab was 10.7 mg/dL (95% LA -21.3 to 42.7 mg/dL), and between Precision PCx versus central lab was 18.6 mg/dL (95% LA -12.6 to 49.5 mg/dL). Accu-chek fingerstick versus central lab arterial samples presented a similar bias (10.0 mg/dL) but a wider 95% LA (-31.8 to 51.8 mg/dL). Agreement between venous samples with arterial central lab was the poorest (mean bias 15.1 mg/dL; 95% LA -51.7 to 81.9). Hyperglycemia, low hematocrit, and acidosis were associated with larger differences between arterial and venous blood measurements with the two glucometers and central lab. Vasopressor administration was associated with increased error for fingerstick measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Sampling from central venous catheters should not be used for glycemic control in ICU patients. In addition, reliability of the two evaluated glucometers was insufficient. Error with Accu-chek Advantage II increases mostly with central venous samples. Hyperglycemia, lower hematocrit, acidosis, and vasopressor administration increase measurement error. Public Library of Science 2015-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4466904/ /pubmed/26067093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129568 Text en © 2015 Pereira et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pereira, Adriano José Corrêa, Thiago Domingos de Almeida, Francisca Pereira Deliberato, Rodrigo Octávio Lobato, Michelle dos Santos Akamine, Nelson Silva, Eliézer Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title | Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full | Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_short | Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study |
title_sort | inaccuracy of venous point-of-care glucose measurements in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereiraadrianojose inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT correathiagodomingos inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT dealmeidafranciscapereira inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT deliberatorodrigooctavio inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT lobatomichelledossantos inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT akaminenelson inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT silvaeliezer inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT cavalcantialexandrebiasi inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy |