Cargando…

Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines and consensus recommend arterial and venous samples as equally acceptable for blood glucose assessment in point-of-care devices, but there is limited evidence to support this recommendation. We evaluated the accuracy of two devices for bedside point-of-care blood glu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Adriano José, Corrêa, Thiago Domingos, de Almeida, Francisca Pereira, Deliberato, Rodrigo Octávio, Lobato, Michelle dos Santos, Akamine, Nelson, Silva, Eliézer, Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129568
_version_ 1782376305173463040
author Pereira, Adriano José
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
de Almeida, Francisca Pereira
Deliberato, Rodrigo Octávio
Lobato, Michelle dos Santos
Akamine, Nelson
Silva, Eliézer
Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi
author_facet Pereira, Adriano José
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
de Almeida, Francisca Pereira
Deliberato, Rodrigo Octávio
Lobato, Michelle dos Santos
Akamine, Nelson
Silva, Eliézer
Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi
author_sort Pereira, Adriano José
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines and consensus recommend arterial and venous samples as equally acceptable for blood glucose assessment in point-of-care devices, but there is limited evidence to support this recommendation. We evaluated the accuracy of two devices for bedside point-of-care blood glucose measurements using arterial, fingerstick and catheter venous blood samples in ICU patients, and assessed which factors could impair their accuracy. METHODS: 145 patients from a 41-bed adult mixed-ICU, in a tertiary care hospital were prospectively enrolled. Fingerstick, central venous (catheter) and arterial blood (indwelling catheter) samples were simultaneously collected, once per patient. Arterial measurements obtained with Precision PCx, and arterial, fingerstick and venous measurements obtained with Accu-chek Advantage II were compared to arterial central lab measurements. Agreement between point-of-care and laboratory measurements were evaluated with Bland-Altman, and multiple linear regression models were used to investigate interference of associated factors. RESULTS: Mean difference between Accu-chek arterial samples versus central lab was 10.7 mg/dL (95% LA -21.3 to 42.7 mg/dL), and between Precision PCx versus central lab was 18.6 mg/dL (95% LA -12.6 to 49.5 mg/dL). Accu-chek fingerstick versus central lab arterial samples presented a similar bias (10.0 mg/dL) but a wider 95% LA (-31.8 to 51.8 mg/dL). Agreement between venous samples with arterial central lab was the poorest (mean bias 15.1 mg/dL; 95% LA -51.7 to 81.9). Hyperglycemia, low hematocrit, and acidosis were associated with larger differences between arterial and venous blood measurements with the two glucometers and central lab. Vasopressor administration was associated with increased error for fingerstick measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Sampling from central venous catheters should not be used for glycemic control in ICU patients. In addition, reliability of the two evaluated glucometers was insufficient. Error with Accu-chek Advantage II increases mostly with central venous samples. Hyperglycemia, lower hematocrit, acidosis, and vasopressor administration increase measurement error.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4466904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44669042015-06-22 Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study Pereira, Adriano José Corrêa, Thiago Domingos de Almeida, Francisca Pereira Deliberato, Rodrigo Octávio Lobato, Michelle dos Santos Akamine, Nelson Silva, Eliézer Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines and consensus recommend arterial and venous samples as equally acceptable for blood glucose assessment in point-of-care devices, but there is limited evidence to support this recommendation. We evaluated the accuracy of two devices for bedside point-of-care blood glucose measurements using arterial, fingerstick and catheter venous blood samples in ICU patients, and assessed which factors could impair their accuracy. METHODS: 145 patients from a 41-bed adult mixed-ICU, in a tertiary care hospital were prospectively enrolled. Fingerstick, central venous (catheter) and arterial blood (indwelling catheter) samples were simultaneously collected, once per patient. Arterial measurements obtained with Precision PCx, and arterial, fingerstick and venous measurements obtained with Accu-chek Advantage II were compared to arterial central lab measurements. Agreement between point-of-care and laboratory measurements were evaluated with Bland-Altman, and multiple linear regression models were used to investigate interference of associated factors. RESULTS: Mean difference between Accu-chek arterial samples versus central lab was 10.7 mg/dL (95% LA -21.3 to 42.7 mg/dL), and between Precision PCx versus central lab was 18.6 mg/dL (95% LA -12.6 to 49.5 mg/dL). Accu-chek fingerstick versus central lab arterial samples presented a similar bias (10.0 mg/dL) but a wider 95% LA (-31.8 to 51.8 mg/dL). Agreement between venous samples with arterial central lab was the poorest (mean bias 15.1 mg/dL; 95% LA -51.7 to 81.9). Hyperglycemia, low hematocrit, and acidosis were associated with larger differences between arterial and venous blood measurements with the two glucometers and central lab. Vasopressor administration was associated with increased error for fingerstick measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Sampling from central venous catheters should not be used for glycemic control in ICU patients. In addition, reliability of the two evaluated glucometers was insufficient. Error with Accu-chek Advantage II increases mostly with central venous samples. Hyperglycemia, lower hematocrit, acidosis, and vasopressor administration increase measurement error. Public Library of Science 2015-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4466904/ /pubmed/26067093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129568 Text en © 2015 Pereira et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pereira, Adriano José
Corrêa, Thiago Domingos
de Almeida, Francisca Pereira
Deliberato, Rodrigo Octávio
Lobato, Michelle dos Santos
Akamine, Nelson
Silva, Eliézer
Cavalcanti, Alexandre Biasi
Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort inaccuracy of venous point-of-care glucose measurements in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26067093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129568
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiraadrianojose inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT correathiagodomingos inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT dealmeidafranciscapereira inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT deliberatorodrigooctavio inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT lobatomichelledossantos inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT akaminenelson inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT silvaeliezer inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT cavalcantialexandrebiasi inaccuracyofvenouspointofcareglucosemeasurementsincriticallyillpatientsacrosssectionalstudy