Cargando…

Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: Practice patterns among respiratory therapists in Ontario

BACKGROUND: The mechanical insufflator-exsufflator (MIE) is effective in assisting cough and in helping to avoid unplanned hospitalizations, tracheostomy and long-term ventilation in patients with neuromuscular disease or spinal cord injury. Despite this, the availability and usage of the device in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prevost, Shelley, Brooks, Dina, Bwititi, Phillip T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pulsus Group Inc 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4467476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089736
_version_ 1782376375616798720
author Prevost, Shelley
Brooks, Dina
Bwititi, Phillip T
author_facet Prevost, Shelley
Brooks, Dina
Bwititi, Phillip T
author_sort Prevost, Shelley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The mechanical insufflator-exsufflator (MIE) is effective in assisting cough and in helping to avoid unplanned hospitalizations, tracheostomy and long-term ventilation in patients with neuromuscular disease or spinal cord injury. Despite this, the availability and usage of the device in Canada is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate practice patterns and availability of the MIE in Ontario hospitals. METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered mail survey was sent to a random sample of 400 respiratory therapists practicing in 96 Ontario hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 114 (28%) completed surveys were returned from 62 (65%) hospitals. Twenty (32%) hospitals had a MIE. The respiratory therapist was the predominant health care provider using the MIE. The device was most commonly used in the intensive care unit, and medical/surgical units in patients with neuromuscular diseases or spinal cord injuries. Optimal pressure spans of 35 cmH(2)O to 40 cmH(2)O were used by 54% of respondents. Fourteen of the 20 hospitals with an MIE had policies or guidelines in place, and four of these hospitals had established staff competencies. Measurements of peak cough flow, maximal inspiratory/expiratory pressure and vital capacity were reported to be infrequently performed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that the MIE device is not widely available in Ontario hospitals and there are variations in how the devices are applied, possibly resulting in suboptimal therapy. A comprehensive educational program about MIE devices that incorporates best practices and a practical component is recommended for current providers as well as for inclusion in student curricula.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4467476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Pulsus Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44674762015-06-18 Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: Practice patterns among respiratory therapists in Ontario Prevost, Shelley Brooks, Dina Bwititi, Phillip T Can J Respir Ther Original Article BACKGROUND: The mechanical insufflator-exsufflator (MIE) is effective in assisting cough and in helping to avoid unplanned hospitalizations, tracheostomy and long-term ventilation in patients with neuromuscular disease or spinal cord injury. Despite this, the availability and usage of the device in Canada is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate practice patterns and availability of the MIE in Ontario hospitals. METHODS: A cross-sectional, self-administered mail survey was sent to a random sample of 400 respiratory therapists practicing in 96 Ontario hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 114 (28%) completed surveys were returned from 62 (65%) hospitals. Twenty (32%) hospitals had a MIE. The respiratory therapist was the predominant health care provider using the MIE. The device was most commonly used in the intensive care unit, and medical/surgical units in patients with neuromuscular diseases or spinal cord injuries. Optimal pressure spans of 35 cmH(2)O to 40 cmH(2)O were used by 54% of respondents. Fourteen of the 20 hospitals with an MIE had policies or guidelines in place, and four of these hospitals had established staff competencies. Measurements of peak cough flow, maximal inspiratory/expiratory pressure and vital capacity were reported to be infrequently performed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that the MIE device is not widely available in Ontario hospitals and there are variations in how the devices are applied, possibly resulting in suboptimal therapy. A comprehensive educational program about MIE devices that incorporates best practices and a practical component is recommended for current providers as well as for inclusion in student curricula. Pulsus Group Inc 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4467476/ /pubmed/26089736 Text en © 2015 Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists. All rights reserved This open-access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits reuse, distribution and reproduction of the article, provided that the original work is properly cited and the reuse is restricted to noncommercial purposes. For commercial reuse, contact support@pulsus.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Prevost, Shelley
Brooks, Dina
Bwititi, Phillip T
Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: Practice patterns among respiratory therapists in Ontario
title Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: Practice patterns among respiratory therapists in Ontario
title_full Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: Practice patterns among respiratory therapists in Ontario
title_fullStr Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: Practice patterns among respiratory therapists in Ontario
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: Practice patterns among respiratory therapists in Ontario
title_short Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: Practice patterns among respiratory therapists in Ontario
title_sort mechanical insufflation-exsufflation: practice patterns among respiratory therapists in ontario
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4467476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089736
work_keys_str_mv AT prevostshelley mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationpracticepatternsamongrespiratorytherapistsinontario
AT brooksdina mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationpracticepatternsamongrespiratorytherapistsinontario
AT bwititiphillipt mechanicalinsufflationexsufflationpracticepatternsamongrespiratorytherapistsinontario