Cargando…

Impact of Pacemaker Lead Characteristics on Pacemaker Related Infection and Heart Perforation: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Several risk factors for pacemaker (PM) related complications have been reported. However, no study has investigated the impact of lead characteristics on pacemaker-related complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who received a new pacemaker implant from January 1997 to December 201...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Yu-Sheng, Chen, Tien-Hsing, Hung, Sheng-Ping, Chen, Dong Yi, Mao, Chun-Tai, Tsai, Ming-Lung, Chang, Shih-Tai, Wang, Chun-Chieh, Wen, Ming-Shien, Chen, Mien-Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26075602
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128320
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Several risk factors for pacemaker (PM) related complications have been reported. However, no study has investigated the impact of lead characteristics on pacemaker-related complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who received a new pacemaker implant from January 1997 to December 2011 were selected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Database. This population was grouped according to the pacemaker lead characteristics in terms of fixation and insulation. The impact of the characteristics of leads on early heart perforation was analyzed by multivariable logistic regression analysis, while the impact of the lead characteristics on early and late infection and late heart perforation over a three-year period were analyzed using Cox regression. This study included 36,104 patients with a mean age of 73.4±12.5 years. In terms of both early and late heart perforations, there were no significant differences between groups across the different types of fixation and insulations. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, the pacemaker-related infection rate was significantly lower in the active fixation only group compared to either the both fixation (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07–0.80; P = 0.020) or the passive fixation group (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08–0.83; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in heart perforation between active and passive fixation leads. Active fixation leads were associated with reduced risk of pacemaker-related infection.