Cargando…

Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach

BACKGROUND: Non-inferiority trials are performed when the main therapeutic effect of the new therapy is expected to be not unacceptably worse than that of the standard therapy, and the new therapy is expected to have advantages over the standard therapy in costs or other (health) consequences. These...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouman, A. C., ten Cate-Hoek, A. J., Ramaekers, B. L. T., Joore, M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26076354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130531
_version_ 1782376450120220672
author Bouman, A. C.
ten Cate-Hoek, A. J.
Ramaekers, B. L. T.
Joore, M. A.
author_facet Bouman, A. C.
ten Cate-Hoek, A. J.
Ramaekers, B. L. T.
Joore, M. A.
author_sort Bouman, A. C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-inferiority trials are performed when the main therapeutic effect of the new therapy is expected to be not unacceptably worse than that of the standard therapy, and the new therapy is expected to have advantages over the standard therapy in costs or other (health) consequences. These advantages however are not included in the classic frequentist approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials. In contrast, the decision theory approach of sample size calculation does include these factors. The objective of this study is to compare the conceptual and practical aspects of the frequentist approach and decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials, thereby demonstrating that the decision theory approach is more appropriate for sample size calculation of non-inferiority trials. METHODS: The frequentist approach and decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials are compared and applied to a case of a non-inferiority trial on individually tailored duration of elastic compression stocking therapy compared to two years elastic compression stocking therapy for the prevention of post thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: The two approaches differ substantially in conceptual background, analytical approach, and input requirements. The sample size calculated according to the frequentist approach yielded 788 patients, using a power of 80% and a one-sided significance level of 5%. The decision theory approach indicated that the optimal sample size was 500 patients, with a net value of €92 million. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates and explains the differences between the classic frequentist approach and the decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials. We argue that the decision theory approach of sample size estimation is most suitable for sample size calculation of non-inferiority trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4468148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44681482015-06-25 Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach Bouman, A. C. ten Cate-Hoek, A. J. Ramaekers, B. L. T. Joore, M. A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Non-inferiority trials are performed when the main therapeutic effect of the new therapy is expected to be not unacceptably worse than that of the standard therapy, and the new therapy is expected to have advantages over the standard therapy in costs or other (health) consequences. These advantages however are not included in the classic frequentist approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials. In contrast, the decision theory approach of sample size calculation does include these factors. The objective of this study is to compare the conceptual and practical aspects of the frequentist approach and decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials, thereby demonstrating that the decision theory approach is more appropriate for sample size calculation of non-inferiority trials. METHODS: The frequentist approach and decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials are compared and applied to a case of a non-inferiority trial on individually tailored duration of elastic compression stocking therapy compared to two years elastic compression stocking therapy for the prevention of post thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: The two approaches differ substantially in conceptual background, analytical approach, and input requirements. The sample size calculated according to the frequentist approach yielded 788 patients, using a power of 80% and a one-sided significance level of 5%. The decision theory approach indicated that the optimal sample size was 500 patients, with a net value of €92 million. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates and explains the differences between the classic frequentist approach and the decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials. We argue that the decision theory approach of sample size estimation is most suitable for sample size calculation of non-inferiority trials. Public Library of Science 2015-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4468148/ /pubmed/26076354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130531 Text en © 2015 Bouman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bouman, A. C.
ten Cate-Hoek, A. J.
Ramaekers, B. L. T.
Joore, M. A.
Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach
title Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach
title_full Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach
title_fullStr Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach
title_full_unstemmed Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach
title_short Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach
title_sort sample size estimation for non-inferiority trials: frequentist approach versus decision theory approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26076354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130531
work_keys_str_mv AT boumanac samplesizeestimationfornoninferioritytrialsfrequentistapproachversusdecisiontheoryapproach
AT tencatehoekaj samplesizeestimationfornoninferioritytrialsfrequentistapproachversusdecisiontheoryapproach
AT ramaekersblt samplesizeestimationfornoninferioritytrialsfrequentistapproachversusdecisiontheoryapproach
AT joorema samplesizeestimationfornoninferioritytrialsfrequentistapproachversusdecisiontheoryapproach