Cargando…

Curriculum leadership in the postgraduate: Gap between current and optimal status

BACKGROUND: Identifying the strengths and weakness points is one of the effective methods to analyze current status, and prioritizing actions based on the gap between current and optimal status is necessary for short-term and long-term planning in departments and colleges. The aim of this study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avizhgan, Maryam, Jafari, Ebrahim Mirshah, Nasr, Ahmad Reza, Changiz, Tahereh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109996
_version_ 1782376514207088640
author Avizhgan, Maryam
Jafari, Ebrahim Mirshah
Nasr, Ahmad Reza
Changiz, Tahereh
author_facet Avizhgan, Maryam
Jafari, Ebrahim Mirshah
Nasr, Ahmad Reza
Changiz, Tahereh
author_sort Avizhgan, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying the strengths and weakness points is one of the effective methods to analyze current status, and prioritizing actions based on the gap between current and optimal status is necessary for short-term and long-term planning in departments and colleges. The aim of this study was to determine the gap between current and optimal status of curriculum leadership in the postgraduate courses in two Iranian universities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a sample of 212 faculty members from the two Iranian universities (one medical and one nonmedical) was randomly selected through stratified random sampling method. Data were collected by using a researcher-made questionnaire, with 55 items categorized in four areas of main dimensions in curriculum leadership. The validity of the questionnaire was determined by curriculum studies scholars, and the reliability was confirmed as the Cronbach's alpha calculated 0.969. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics according to the variables. RESULTS: There was a gap in all dimensions and roles. The maximum gap (−1.70) with the highest frequency (98%) were related to “improving the educational atmosphere” dimension. As for items, the maximum gap (−2.41) was related to “society needs and expectations and the labor market” in “curriculum development and revision” dimension. CONCLUSION: The negative gap between all dimensions of curriculum leadership implies faculty members’ dissatisfaction. Curriculum leadership at universities, colleges and departments of the study in all aspects need to be improved. Hence, it is necessary for managers to make use of the viewpoints of the faculty members to decrease the gap.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4468456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44684562015-06-24 Curriculum leadership in the postgraduate: Gap between current and optimal status Avizhgan, Maryam Jafari, Ebrahim Mirshah Nasr, Ahmad Reza Changiz, Tahereh J Res Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Identifying the strengths and weakness points is one of the effective methods to analyze current status, and prioritizing actions based on the gap between current and optimal status is necessary for short-term and long-term planning in departments and colleges. The aim of this study was to determine the gap between current and optimal status of curriculum leadership in the postgraduate courses in two Iranian universities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a sample of 212 faculty members from the two Iranian universities (one medical and one nonmedical) was randomly selected through stratified random sampling method. Data were collected by using a researcher-made questionnaire, with 55 items categorized in four areas of main dimensions in curriculum leadership. The validity of the questionnaire was determined by curriculum studies scholars, and the reliability was confirmed as the Cronbach's alpha calculated 0.969. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics according to the variables. RESULTS: There was a gap in all dimensions and roles. The maximum gap (−1.70) with the highest frequency (98%) were related to “improving the educational atmosphere” dimension. As for items, the maximum gap (−2.41) was related to “society needs and expectations and the labor market” in “curriculum development and revision” dimension. CONCLUSION: The negative gap between all dimensions of curriculum leadership implies faculty members’ dissatisfaction. Curriculum leadership at universities, colleges and departments of the study in all aspects need to be improved. Hence, it is necessary for managers to make use of the viewpoints of the faculty members to decrease the gap. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4468456/ /pubmed/26109996 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Research in Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Avizhgan, Maryam
Jafari, Ebrahim Mirshah
Nasr, Ahmad Reza
Changiz, Tahereh
Curriculum leadership in the postgraduate: Gap between current and optimal status
title Curriculum leadership in the postgraduate: Gap between current and optimal status
title_full Curriculum leadership in the postgraduate: Gap between current and optimal status
title_fullStr Curriculum leadership in the postgraduate: Gap between current and optimal status
title_full_unstemmed Curriculum leadership in the postgraduate: Gap between current and optimal status
title_short Curriculum leadership in the postgraduate: Gap between current and optimal status
title_sort curriculum leadership in the postgraduate: gap between current and optimal status
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109996
work_keys_str_mv AT avizhganmaryam curriculumleadershipinthepostgraduategapbetweencurrentandoptimalstatus
AT jafariebrahimmirshah curriculumleadershipinthepostgraduategapbetweencurrentandoptimalstatus
AT nasrahmadreza curriculumleadershipinthepostgraduategapbetweencurrentandoptimalstatus
AT changiztahereh curriculumleadershipinthepostgraduategapbetweencurrentandoptimalstatus