Cargando…

Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND: Improving questionnaire response rates is an everlasting issue for research. Today, the Internet can easily be used to collect data quickly. However, collecting data on the Internet can lead to biased samples because not everyone is able to access or use the Internet. The older populatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horevoorts, Nicole JE, Vissers, Pauline AJ, Mols, Floortje, Thong, Melissa SY, van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25953059
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3741
_version_ 1782376534986719232
author Horevoorts, Nicole JE
Vissers, Pauline AJ
Mols, Floortje
Thong, Melissa SY
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V
author_facet Horevoorts, Nicole JE
Vissers, Pauline AJ
Mols, Floortje
Thong, Melissa SY
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V
author_sort Horevoorts, Nicole JE
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Improving questionnaire response rates is an everlasting issue for research. Today, the Internet can easily be used to collect data quickly. However, collecting data on the Internet can lead to biased samples because not everyone is able to access or use the Internet. The older population, for example, is much less likely to use the Internet. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Initial Treatment and Long-Term Evaluation of Survivorship (PROFILES) registry offers a platform to collect Web-based and paper questionnaires and to try different measures to improve response rates. OBJECTIVE: In this study, our aim was to study the influence of two methods of invitation on the response rate. Our second aim was to examine the preference of questionnaire mode of administration (paper or Web-based) for the older patient in particular. METHODS: To test these two invitational methods, 3406 colorectal cancer patients between ages 18 and 85 years received an invitation containing an access code for the Web-based questionnaire. They could also request a paper questionnaire with an included reply card (paper-optional group). In contrast, 179 randomly selected colorectal cancer patients received a paper questionnaire with the invitation (paper-included group). They could also choose to fill out the Web-based questionnaire with the included access code. RESULTS: Response rates did not differ between the paper-optional and the paper-included groups (73.14%, 2491/3406 and 74.9%, 134/179, P=.57). In the paper-optional group, online response was significantly higher when compared to the paper-included group (41.23%, 1027/2491 vs 12.7%, 17/134, P<.001). The majority of online respondents responded after the first invitation (95.33%, 979/1027), which was significantly higher than the paper respondents (52.19%, 764/1464, P<.001). Respondents aged 70 years and older chose to fill out a paper questionnaire more often (71.0%, 677/954). In the oldest age group (≥80 years), 18.2% (61/336) of the respondents filled out a Web-based questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of difference in response rates between invitation modes implies that researchers can leave out a paper questionnaire at invitation without lowering response rates. It may be preferable not to include a paper questionnaire because more respondents then will fill out a Web-based questionnaire, which will lead to faster available data. However, due to respondent preference, it is not likely that paper questionnaires can be left out completely in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4468744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44687442015-07-02 Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients Horevoorts, Nicole JE Vissers, Pauline AJ Mols, Floortje Thong, Melissa SY van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Improving questionnaire response rates is an everlasting issue for research. Today, the Internet can easily be used to collect data quickly. However, collecting data on the Internet can lead to biased samples because not everyone is able to access or use the Internet. The older population, for example, is much less likely to use the Internet. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Initial Treatment and Long-Term Evaluation of Survivorship (PROFILES) registry offers a platform to collect Web-based and paper questionnaires and to try different measures to improve response rates. OBJECTIVE: In this study, our aim was to study the influence of two methods of invitation on the response rate. Our second aim was to examine the preference of questionnaire mode of administration (paper or Web-based) for the older patient in particular. METHODS: To test these two invitational methods, 3406 colorectal cancer patients between ages 18 and 85 years received an invitation containing an access code for the Web-based questionnaire. They could also request a paper questionnaire with an included reply card (paper-optional group). In contrast, 179 randomly selected colorectal cancer patients received a paper questionnaire with the invitation (paper-included group). They could also choose to fill out the Web-based questionnaire with the included access code. RESULTS: Response rates did not differ between the paper-optional and the paper-included groups (73.14%, 2491/3406 and 74.9%, 134/179, P=.57). In the paper-optional group, online response was significantly higher when compared to the paper-included group (41.23%, 1027/2491 vs 12.7%, 17/134, P<.001). The majority of online respondents responded after the first invitation (95.33%, 979/1027), which was significantly higher than the paper respondents (52.19%, 764/1464, P<.001). Respondents aged 70 years and older chose to fill out a paper questionnaire more often (71.0%, 677/954). In the oldest age group (≥80 years), 18.2% (61/336) of the respondents filled out a Web-based questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of difference in response rates between invitation modes implies that researchers can leave out a paper questionnaire at invitation without lowering response rates. It may be preferable not to include a paper questionnaire because more respondents then will fill out a Web-based questionnaire, which will lead to faster available data. However, due to respondent preference, it is not likely that paper questionnaires can be left out completely in the near future. JMIR Publications Inc. 2015-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4468744/ /pubmed/25953059 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3741 Text en ©Nicole JE Horevoorts, Pauline AJ Vissers, Floortje Mols, Melissa SY Thong, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 07.05.2015. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Horevoorts, Nicole JE
Vissers, Pauline AJ
Mols, Floortje
Thong, Melissa SY
van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V
Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients
title Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_full Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_short Response Rates for Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Web-Based Versus Paper Questionnaires: Comparison of Two Invitational Methods in Older Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_sort response rates for patient-reported outcomes using web-based versus paper questionnaires: comparison of two invitational methods in older colorectal cancer patients
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25953059
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3741
work_keys_str_mv AT horevoortsnicoleje responseratesforpatientreportedoutcomesusingwebbasedversuspaperquestionnairescomparisonoftwoinvitationalmethodsinoldercolorectalcancerpatients
AT visserspaulineaj responseratesforpatientreportedoutcomesusingwebbasedversuspaperquestionnairescomparisonoftwoinvitationalmethodsinoldercolorectalcancerpatients
AT molsfloortje responseratesforpatientreportedoutcomesusingwebbasedversuspaperquestionnairescomparisonoftwoinvitationalmethodsinoldercolorectalcancerpatients
AT thongmelissasy responseratesforpatientreportedoutcomesusingwebbasedversuspaperquestionnairescomparisonoftwoinvitationalmethodsinoldercolorectalcancerpatients
AT vandepollfranselonnekev responseratesforpatientreportedoutcomesusingwebbasedversuspaperquestionnairescomparisonoftwoinvitationalmethodsinoldercolorectalcancerpatients