Cargando…
Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use
Tool use in nonhuman apes can help identify the conditions that drove the extraordinary expansion of hominin technology. Chimpanzees and bonobos are our closest living relatives. Whereas chimpanzees are renowned for their tool use, bonobos use few tools and none in foraging. We investigated whether...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26079292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11356 |
_version_ | 1782376549977161728 |
---|---|
author | Koops, Kathelijne Furuichi, Takeshi Hashimoto, Chie |
author_facet | Koops, Kathelijne Furuichi, Takeshi Hashimoto, Chie |
author_sort | Koops, Kathelijne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tool use in nonhuman apes can help identify the conditions that drove the extraordinary expansion of hominin technology. Chimpanzees and bonobos are our closest living relatives. Whereas chimpanzees are renowned for their tool use, bonobos use few tools and none in foraging. We investigated whether extrinsic (ecological and social opportunities) or intrinsic (predispositions) differences explain this contrast by comparing chimpanzees at Kalinzu (Uganda) and bonobos at Wamba (DRC). We assessed ecological opportunities based on availability of resources requiring tool use. We examined potential opportunities for social learning in immature apes. Lastly, we investigated predispositions by measuring object manipulation and object play. Extrinsic opportunities did not explain the tool use difference, whereas intrinsic predispositions did. Chimpanzees manipulated and played more with objects than bonobos, despite similar levels of solitary and social play. Selection for increased intrinsic motivation to manipulate objects likely also played an important role in the evolution of hominin tool use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4468814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44688142015-06-18 Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use Koops, Kathelijne Furuichi, Takeshi Hashimoto, Chie Sci Rep Article Tool use in nonhuman apes can help identify the conditions that drove the extraordinary expansion of hominin technology. Chimpanzees and bonobos are our closest living relatives. Whereas chimpanzees are renowned for their tool use, bonobos use few tools and none in foraging. We investigated whether extrinsic (ecological and social opportunities) or intrinsic (predispositions) differences explain this contrast by comparing chimpanzees at Kalinzu (Uganda) and bonobos at Wamba (DRC). We assessed ecological opportunities based on availability of resources requiring tool use. We examined potential opportunities for social learning in immature apes. Lastly, we investigated predispositions by measuring object manipulation and object play. Extrinsic opportunities did not explain the tool use difference, whereas intrinsic predispositions did. Chimpanzees manipulated and played more with objects than bonobos, despite similar levels of solitary and social play. Selection for increased intrinsic motivation to manipulate objects likely also played an important role in the evolution of hominin tool use. Nature Publishing Group 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4468814/ /pubmed/26079292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11356 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Koops, Kathelijne Furuichi, Takeshi Hashimoto, Chie Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use |
title | Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use |
title_full | Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use |
title_fullStr | Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use |
title_full_unstemmed | Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use |
title_short | Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use |
title_sort | chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26079292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koopskathelijne chimpanzeesandbonobosdifferinintrinsicmotivationfortooluse AT furuichitakeshi chimpanzeesandbonobosdifferinintrinsicmotivationfortooluse AT hashimotochie chimpanzeesandbonobosdifferinintrinsicmotivationfortooluse |