Cargando…

Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use

Tool use in nonhuman apes can help identify the conditions that drove the extraordinary expansion of hominin technology. Chimpanzees and bonobos are our closest living relatives. Whereas chimpanzees are renowned for their tool use, bonobos use few tools and none in foraging. We investigated whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koops, Kathelijne, Furuichi, Takeshi, Hashimoto, Chie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26079292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11356
_version_ 1782376549977161728
author Koops, Kathelijne
Furuichi, Takeshi
Hashimoto, Chie
author_facet Koops, Kathelijne
Furuichi, Takeshi
Hashimoto, Chie
author_sort Koops, Kathelijne
collection PubMed
description Tool use in nonhuman apes can help identify the conditions that drove the extraordinary expansion of hominin technology. Chimpanzees and bonobos are our closest living relatives. Whereas chimpanzees are renowned for their tool use, bonobos use few tools and none in foraging. We investigated whether extrinsic (ecological and social opportunities) or intrinsic (predispositions) differences explain this contrast by comparing chimpanzees at Kalinzu (Uganda) and bonobos at Wamba (DRC). We assessed ecological opportunities based on availability of resources requiring tool use. We examined potential opportunities for social learning in immature apes. Lastly, we investigated predispositions by measuring object manipulation and object play. Extrinsic opportunities did not explain the tool use difference, whereas intrinsic predispositions did. Chimpanzees manipulated and played more with objects than bonobos, despite similar levels of solitary and social play. Selection for increased intrinsic motivation to manipulate objects likely also played an important role in the evolution of hominin tool use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4468814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44688142015-06-18 Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use Koops, Kathelijne Furuichi, Takeshi Hashimoto, Chie Sci Rep Article Tool use in nonhuman apes can help identify the conditions that drove the extraordinary expansion of hominin technology. Chimpanzees and bonobos are our closest living relatives. Whereas chimpanzees are renowned for their tool use, bonobos use few tools and none in foraging. We investigated whether extrinsic (ecological and social opportunities) or intrinsic (predispositions) differences explain this contrast by comparing chimpanzees at Kalinzu (Uganda) and bonobos at Wamba (DRC). We assessed ecological opportunities based on availability of resources requiring tool use. We examined potential opportunities for social learning in immature apes. Lastly, we investigated predispositions by measuring object manipulation and object play. Extrinsic opportunities did not explain the tool use difference, whereas intrinsic predispositions did. Chimpanzees manipulated and played more with objects than bonobos, despite similar levels of solitary and social play. Selection for increased intrinsic motivation to manipulate objects likely also played an important role in the evolution of hominin tool use. Nature Publishing Group 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4468814/ /pubmed/26079292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11356 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Koops, Kathelijne
Furuichi, Takeshi
Hashimoto, Chie
Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use
title Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use
title_full Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use
title_fullStr Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use
title_full_unstemmed Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use
title_short Chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use
title_sort chimpanzees and bonobos differ in intrinsic motivation for tool use
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468814/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26079292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep11356
work_keys_str_mv AT koopskathelijne chimpanzeesandbonobosdifferinintrinsicmotivationfortooluse
AT furuichitakeshi chimpanzeesandbonobosdifferinintrinsicmotivationfortooluse
AT hashimotochie chimpanzeesandbonobosdifferinintrinsicmotivationfortooluse