Cargando…

Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law

Fitts' (1954) classic theorem asserts that the movement time (MT) of voluntary reaches is determined by amplitude and width requirements (i.e., index of difficulty: ID). Actions associated with equivalent IDs should elicit equivalent MTs regardless of the amplitude and/ or width requirements. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Grosbois, John, Heath, Matthew, Tremblay, Luc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26136703
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00800
_version_ 1782376555636326400
author de Grosbois, John
Heath, Matthew
Tremblay, Luc
author_facet de Grosbois, John
Heath, Matthew
Tremblay, Luc
author_sort de Grosbois, John
collection PubMed
description Fitts' (1954) classic theorem asserts that the movement time (MT) of voluntary reaches is determined by amplitude and width requirements (i.e., index of difficulty: ID). Actions associated with equivalent IDs should elicit equivalent MTs regardless of the amplitude and/ or width requirements. However, contemporary research has reported that amplitude-based contributions to IDs yield larger increases in MTs than width-based contributions. This discrepancy may relate to the presence of augmented terminal feedback in Fitts' original research, which has not been provided in more recent investigations (e.g., Heath et al., 2011). To address this issue, participants performed reaching movements during two sessions wherein feedback regarding terminal accuracy was either provided or withheld. It was hypothesized that the absence of augmented terminal feedback would result in a stereotyped performance across target widths and explain the violation of Fitts' theorem. Yet, the results revealed distinct influences of amplitude- and width-based manipulations on MT, which also persisted across feedback conditions. This finding supports the assertion that the unitary nature of Fitts' theorem does not account for a continuous range of movement amplitudes and target widths. A secondary analysis was competed in an attempt to further investigate the violation of Fitts' Law. Based on error rates, participants were segregated into accuracy- and speed-prone groups. Additionally, target's IDs were recalculated based on each participant's performance using the effective target width (i.e., ID(We)) instead of the nominal target width. When using MT data from the accuracy-prone group with this ID(We), the aforementioned violation was alleviated. Overall, augmented terminal feedback did not explain the violation of Fitts' theorem, although one should consider using the effective target width and participant's strategy in future investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4468837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44688372015-07-01 Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law de Grosbois, John Heath, Matthew Tremblay, Luc Front Psychol Psychology Fitts' (1954) classic theorem asserts that the movement time (MT) of voluntary reaches is determined by amplitude and width requirements (i.e., index of difficulty: ID). Actions associated with equivalent IDs should elicit equivalent MTs regardless of the amplitude and/ or width requirements. However, contemporary research has reported that amplitude-based contributions to IDs yield larger increases in MTs than width-based contributions. This discrepancy may relate to the presence of augmented terminal feedback in Fitts' original research, which has not been provided in more recent investigations (e.g., Heath et al., 2011). To address this issue, participants performed reaching movements during two sessions wherein feedback regarding terminal accuracy was either provided or withheld. It was hypothesized that the absence of augmented terminal feedback would result in a stereotyped performance across target widths and explain the violation of Fitts' theorem. Yet, the results revealed distinct influences of amplitude- and width-based manipulations on MT, which also persisted across feedback conditions. This finding supports the assertion that the unitary nature of Fitts' theorem does not account for a continuous range of movement amplitudes and target widths. A secondary analysis was competed in an attempt to further investigate the violation of Fitts' Law. Based on error rates, participants were segregated into accuracy- and speed-prone groups. Additionally, target's IDs were recalculated based on each participant's performance using the effective target width (i.e., ID(We)) instead of the nominal target width. When using MT data from the accuracy-prone group with this ID(We), the aforementioned violation was alleviated. Overall, augmented terminal feedback did not explain the violation of Fitts' theorem, although one should consider using the effective target width and participant's strategy in future investigations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4468837/ /pubmed/26136703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00800 Text en Copyright © 2015 de Grosbois, Heath and Tremblay. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
de Grosbois, John
Heath, Matthew
Tremblay, Luc
Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law
title Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law
title_full Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law
title_fullStr Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law
title_full_unstemmed Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law
title_short Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law
title_sort augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of fitts' law
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26136703
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00800
work_keys_str_mv AT degrosboisjohn augmentedfeedbackinfluencesupperlimbreachingmovementtimesbutdoesnotexplainviolationsoffittslaw
AT heathmatthew augmentedfeedbackinfluencesupperlimbreachingmovementtimesbutdoesnotexplainviolationsoffittslaw
AT tremblayluc augmentedfeedbackinfluencesupperlimbreachingmovementtimesbutdoesnotexplainviolationsoffittslaw