Cargando…
Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law
Fitts' (1954) classic theorem asserts that the movement time (MT) of voluntary reaches is determined by amplitude and width requirements (i.e., index of difficulty: ID). Actions associated with equivalent IDs should elicit equivalent MTs regardless of the amplitude and/ or width requirements. H...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26136703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00800 |
_version_ | 1782376555636326400 |
---|---|
author | de Grosbois, John Heath, Matthew Tremblay, Luc |
author_facet | de Grosbois, John Heath, Matthew Tremblay, Luc |
author_sort | de Grosbois, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fitts' (1954) classic theorem asserts that the movement time (MT) of voluntary reaches is determined by amplitude and width requirements (i.e., index of difficulty: ID). Actions associated with equivalent IDs should elicit equivalent MTs regardless of the amplitude and/ or width requirements. However, contemporary research has reported that amplitude-based contributions to IDs yield larger increases in MTs than width-based contributions. This discrepancy may relate to the presence of augmented terminal feedback in Fitts' original research, which has not been provided in more recent investigations (e.g., Heath et al., 2011). To address this issue, participants performed reaching movements during two sessions wherein feedback regarding terminal accuracy was either provided or withheld. It was hypothesized that the absence of augmented terminal feedback would result in a stereotyped performance across target widths and explain the violation of Fitts' theorem. Yet, the results revealed distinct influences of amplitude- and width-based manipulations on MT, which also persisted across feedback conditions. This finding supports the assertion that the unitary nature of Fitts' theorem does not account for a continuous range of movement amplitudes and target widths. A secondary analysis was competed in an attempt to further investigate the violation of Fitts' Law. Based on error rates, participants were segregated into accuracy- and speed-prone groups. Additionally, target's IDs were recalculated based on each participant's performance using the effective target width (i.e., ID(We)) instead of the nominal target width. When using MT data from the accuracy-prone group with this ID(We), the aforementioned violation was alleviated. Overall, augmented terminal feedback did not explain the violation of Fitts' theorem, although one should consider using the effective target width and participant's strategy in future investigations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4468837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44688372015-07-01 Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law de Grosbois, John Heath, Matthew Tremblay, Luc Front Psychol Psychology Fitts' (1954) classic theorem asserts that the movement time (MT) of voluntary reaches is determined by amplitude and width requirements (i.e., index of difficulty: ID). Actions associated with equivalent IDs should elicit equivalent MTs regardless of the amplitude and/ or width requirements. However, contemporary research has reported that amplitude-based contributions to IDs yield larger increases in MTs than width-based contributions. This discrepancy may relate to the presence of augmented terminal feedback in Fitts' original research, which has not been provided in more recent investigations (e.g., Heath et al., 2011). To address this issue, participants performed reaching movements during two sessions wherein feedback regarding terminal accuracy was either provided or withheld. It was hypothesized that the absence of augmented terminal feedback would result in a stereotyped performance across target widths and explain the violation of Fitts' theorem. Yet, the results revealed distinct influences of amplitude- and width-based manipulations on MT, which also persisted across feedback conditions. This finding supports the assertion that the unitary nature of Fitts' theorem does not account for a continuous range of movement amplitudes and target widths. A secondary analysis was competed in an attempt to further investigate the violation of Fitts' Law. Based on error rates, participants were segregated into accuracy- and speed-prone groups. Additionally, target's IDs were recalculated based on each participant's performance using the effective target width (i.e., ID(We)) instead of the nominal target width. When using MT data from the accuracy-prone group with this ID(We), the aforementioned violation was alleviated. Overall, augmented terminal feedback did not explain the violation of Fitts' theorem, although one should consider using the effective target width and participant's strategy in future investigations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4468837/ /pubmed/26136703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00800 Text en Copyright © 2015 de Grosbois, Heath and Tremblay. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology de Grosbois, John Heath, Matthew Tremblay, Luc Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law |
title | Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law |
title_full | Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law |
title_fullStr | Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law |
title_full_unstemmed | Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law |
title_short | Augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of Fitts' Law |
title_sort | augmented feedback influences upper limb reaching movement times but does not explain violations of fitts' law |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26136703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00800 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT degrosboisjohn augmentedfeedbackinfluencesupperlimbreachingmovementtimesbutdoesnotexplainviolationsoffittslaw AT heathmatthew augmentedfeedbackinfluencesupperlimbreachingmovementtimesbutdoesnotexplainviolationsoffittslaw AT tremblayluc augmentedfeedbackinfluencesupperlimbreachingmovementtimesbutdoesnotexplainviolationsoffittslaw |