Cargando…

Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera

BACKGROUND: Cholera is an acute watery diarrhoea caused by infection with the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which if severe can cause rapid dehydration and death. Effective management requires early diagnosis and rehydration using oral rehydration salts or intravenous fluids. In this review, we evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leibovici‐Weissman, Ya'ara, Neuberger, Ami, Bitterman, Roni, Sinclair, David, Salam, Mohammed Abdus, Paul, Mical
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008625.pub2
_version_ 1782376569019301888
author Leibovici‐Weissman, Ya'ara
Neuberger, Ami
Bitterman, Roni
Sinclair, David
Salam, Mohammed Abdus
Paul, Mical
author_facet Leibovici‐Weissman, Ya'ara
Neuberger, Ami
Bitterman, Roni
Sinclair, David
Salam, Mohammed Abdus
Paul, Mical
author_sort Leibovici‐Weissman, Ya'ara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cholera is an acute watery diarrhoea caused by infection with the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which if severe can cause rapid dehydration and death. Effective management requires early diagnosis and rehydration using oral rehydration salts or intravenous fluids. In this review, we evaluate the additional benefits of treating cholera with antimicrobial drugs. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the benefit of antimicrobial treatment for patients with cholera, and determine whether there are differences between classes of antimicrobials or dosing schedules. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; African Index Medicus; LILACS; Science Citation Index; metaRegister of Controlled Trials; WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; conference proceedings; and reference lists to March 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi‐randomized controlled clinical trials in adults and children with cholera that compared: 1) any antimicrobial treatment with placebo or no treatment; 2) different antimicrobials head‐to‐head; or 3) different dosing schedules or different durations of treatment with the same antimicrobial. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, and extracted data from included trials. Diarrhoea duration and stool volume were defined as primary outcomes. We calculated mean difference (MD) or ratio of means (ROM) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and pooled data using a random‐effects meta‐analysis. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty‐nine trials were included in this review with 4623 participants. Antimicrobials versus placebo or no treatment Overall, antimicrobial therapy shortened the mean duration of diarrhoea by about a day and a half compared to placebo or no treatment (MD ‐36.77 hours, 95% CI ‐43.51 to ‐30.03, 19 trials, 1013 participants, moderate quality evidence). Antimicrobial therapy also reduced the total stool volume by 50% (ROM 0.5, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.56, 18 trials, 1042 participants, moderate quality evidence) and reduced the amount of rehydration fluids required by 40% (ROM 0.60, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.68, 11 trials, 1201 participants, moderate quality evidence). The mean duration of fecal excretion of vibrios was reduced by almost three days (MD 2.74 days, 95% CI ‐3.07 to ‐2.40, 12 trials, 740 participants, moderate quality evidence). There was substantial heterogeneity in the size of these benefits, probably due to differences in the antibiotic used, the trial methods (particularly effective randomization), and the timing of outcome assessment. The benefits of antibiotics were seen both in trials recruiting only patients with severe dehydration and in those recruiting patients with mixed levels of dehydration. Comparisons of antimicrobials In head‐to‐head comparisons, there were no differences detected in diarrhoea duration or stool volume for tetracycline compared to doxycycline (three trials, 230 participants, very low quality evidence); or tetracycline compared to ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin (three trials, 259 participants, moderate quality evidence). In indirect comparisons with substantially more trials, tetracycline appeared to have larger benefits than doxycycline, norfloxacin and trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole for the primary review outcomes. Single dose azithromycin shortened the duration of diarrhoea by over a day compared to ciprofloxacin (MD ‐32.43, 95% CI ‐62.90 to ‐1.95, two trials, 375 participants, moderate quality evidence) and by half a day compared to erythromycin (MD ‐12.05, 95% CI ‐22.02 to ‐2.08, two trials, 179 participants, moderate quality evidence). It was not compared with tetracycline. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In treating cholera, antimicrobials result in substantial improvements in clinical and microbiological outcomes, with similar effects observed in severely and non‐severely ill patients. Azithromycin and tetracycline may have some advantages over other antibiotics. 23 March 2018 No update planned Research area no longer active Research area no longer active
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4468928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44689282015-06-29 Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera Leibovici‐Weissman, Ya'ara Neuberger, Ami Bitterman, Roni Sinclair, David Salam, Mohammed Abdus Paul, Mical Cochrane Database Syst Rev BACKGROUND: Cholera is an acute watery diarrhoea caused by infection with the bacterium Vibrio cholerae, which if severe can cause rapid dehydration and death. Effective management requires early diagnosis and rehydration using oral rehydration salts or intravenous fluids. In this review, we evaluate the additional benefits of treating cholera with antimicrobial drugs. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the benefit of antimicrobial treatment for patients with cholera, and determine whether there are differences between classes of antimicrobials or dosing schedules. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; African Index Medicus; LILACS; Science Citation Index; metaRegister of Controlled Trials; WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform; conference proceedings; and reference lists to March 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi‐randomized controlled clinical trials in adults and children with cholera that compared: 1) any antimicrobial treatment with placebo or no treatment; 2) different antimicrobials head‐to‐head; or 3) different dosing schedules or different durations of treatment with the same antimicrobial. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied inclusion and exclusion criteria, and extracted data from included trials. Diarrhoea duration and stool volume were defined as primary outcomes. We calculated mean difference (MD) or ratio of means (ROM) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and pooled data using a random‐effects meta‐analysis. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty‐nine trials were included in this review with 4623 participants. Antimicrobials versus placebo or no treatment Overall, antimicrobial therapy shortened the mean duration of diarrhoea by about a day and a half compared to placebo or no treatment (MD ‐36.77 hours, 95% CI ‐43.51 to ‐30.03, 19 trials, 1013 participants, moderate quality evidence). Antimicrobial therapy also reduced the total stool volume by 50% (ROM 0.5, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.56, 18 trials, 1042 participants, moderate quality evidence) and reduced the amount of rehydration fluids required by 40% (ROM 0.60, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.68, 11 trials, 1201 participants, moderate quality evidence). The mean duration of fecal excretion of vibrios was reduced by almost three days (MD 2.74 days, 95% CI ‐3.07 to ‐2.40, 12 trials, 740 participants, moderate quality evidence). There was substantial heterogeneity in the size of these benefits, probably due to differences in the antibiotic used, the trial methods (particularly effective randomization), and the timing of outcome assessment. The benefits of antibiotics were seen both in trials recruiting only patients with severe dehydration and in those recruiting patients with mixed levels of dehydration. Comparisons of antimicrobials In head‐to‐head comparisons, there were no differences detected in diarrhoea duration or stool volume for tetracycline compared to doxycycline (three trials, 230 participants, very low quality evidence); or tetracycline compared to ciprofloxacin or norfloxacin (three trials, 259 participants, moderate quality evidence). In indirect comparisons with substantially more trials, tetracycline appeared to have larger benefits than doxycycline, norfloxacin and trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole for the primary review outcomes. Single dose azithromycin shortened the duration of diarrhoea by over a day compared to ciprofloxacin (MD ‐32.43, 95% CI ‐62.90 to ‐1.95, two trials, 375 participants, moderate quality evidence) and by half a day compared to erythromycin (MD ‐12.05, 95% CI ‐22.02 to ‐2.08, two trials, 179 participants, moderate quality evidence). It was not compared with tetracycline. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In treating cholera, antimicrobials result in substantial improvements in clinical and microbiological outcomes, with similar effects observed in severely and non‐severely ill patients. Azithromycin and tetracycline may have some advantages over other antibiotics. 23 March 2018 No update planned Research area no longer active Research area no longer active John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4468928/ /pubmed/24944120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008625.pub2 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐Non‐Commercial (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Leibovici‐Weissman, Ya'ara
Neuberger, Ami
Bitterman, Roni
Sinclair, David
Salam, Mohammed Abdus
Paul, Mical
Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera
title Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera
title_full Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera
title_fullStr Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera
title_short Antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera
title_sort antimicrobial drugs for treating cholera
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24944120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008625.pub2
work_keys_str_mv AT leiboviciweissmanyaara antimicrobialdrugsfortreatingcholera
AT neubergerami antimicrobialdrugsfortreatingcholera
AT bittermanroni antimicrobialdrugsfortreatingcholera
AT sinclairdavid antimicrobialdrugsfortreatingcholera
AT salammohammedabdus antimicrobialdrugsfortreatingcholera
AT paulmical antimicrobialdrugsfortreatingcholera