Cargando…

Attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Population screening might provide a mechanism to enable early detection of dementia. Yet the potential benefits, harms or acceptability of such a large-scale intervention are not well understood. This research aims to examine the attitudes and preferences of the general public, health c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Steven, Kelly, Sarah, Khan, Ayesha, Cullum, Sarah, Dening, Tom, Rait, Greta, Fox, Chris, Katona, Cornelius, Cosco, Theodore, Brayne, Carol, Lafortune, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26076729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0064-6
_version_ 1782376584664055808
author Martin, Steven
Kelly, Sarah
Khan, Ayesha
Cullum, Sarah
Dening, Tom
Rait, Greta
Fox, Chris
Katona, Cornelius
Cosco, Theodore
Brayne, Carol
Lafortune, Louise
author_facet Martin, Steven
Kelly, Sarah
Khan, Ayesha
Cullum, Sarah
Dening, Tom
Rait, Greta
Fox, Chris
Katona, Cornelius
Cosco, Theodore
Brayne, Carol
Lafortune, Louise
author_sort Martin, Steven
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Population screening might provide a mechanism to enable early detection of dementia. Yet the potential benefits, harms or acceptability of such a large-scale intervention are not well understood. This research aims to examine the attitudes and preferences of the general public, health care professionals, people with dementia and their carers towards population screening for dementia. METHODS: A systematic review of the international literature was undertaken. A search of fifteen bibliographic databases was conducted (up to 12 July 2012; no language restriction) using terms related to dementia, screening, specific screening tools, case finding, and attitudes and preferences; genetic screening and biomarkers were excluded. All study designs were included except opinion-based papers. Included papers were doubly quality assessed and thematically analysed using NVivo. RESULTS: 29,910 papers were identified of which 29 met the inclusion criteria. We identified seventeen themes relating to the 3 phases of the screening process (pre-, in- and post-screen) – none emerged as more of a facilitator than a barrier to the acceptance of dementia screening. Seven themes emerged in relation to the patient, carer and general population: existing health state; lifestyle and life view; awareness of dementia; role of clinician; communication; benefit; and role of the family. Ten themes emerged in relation to the clinician and healthcare professional: patient’s existing health and comorbidities; awareness of dementia; confidence; duration of patient contact; suitability of screening tool; cost; disclosure; time; treatment and prognosis; and stigma. CONCLUSIONS: As for all screening programmes, screening for dementia raises complex issues around preference and choice for clinicians and the public, and it is unclear what specific factors promote or reduce screening acceptance the most. Overall, the level of evidence is low, few large scale studies have been undertaken and none were conducted in representative samples, all affecting the generalizability of identified themes across healthcare contexts. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that population screening for dementia may not be acceptable to either the general public or health care professionals, and highlight where focused efforts are needed to gain insights into dementia specific issues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0064-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4469007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44690072015-06-17 Attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature Martin, Steven Kelly, Sarah Khan, Ayesha Cullum, Sarah Dening, Tom Rait, Greta Fox, Chris Katona, Cornelius Cosco, Theodore Brayne, Carol Lafortune, Louise BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Population screening might provide a mechanism to enable early detection of dementia. Yet the potential benefits, harms or acceptability of such a large-scale intervention are not well understood. This research aims to examine the attitudes and preferences of the general public, health care professionals, people with dementia and their carers towards population screening for dementia. METHODS: A systematic review of the international literature was undertaken. A search of fifteen bibliographic databases was conducted (up to 12 July 2012; no language restriction) using terms related to dementia, screening, specific screening tools, case finding, and attitudes and preferences; genetic screening and biomarkers were excluded. All study designs were included except opinion-based papers. Included papers were doubly quality assessed and thematically analysed using NVivo. RESULTS: 29,910 papers were identified of which 29 met the inclusion criteria. We identified seventeen themes relating to the 3 phases of the screening process (pre-, in- and post-screen) – none emerged as more of a facilitator than a barrier to the acceptance of dementia screening. Seven themes emerged in relation to the patient, carer and general population: existing health state; lifestyle and life view; awareness of dementia; role of clinician; communication; benefit; and role of the family. Ten themes emerged in relation to the clinician and healthcare professional: patient’s existing health and comorbidities; awareness of dementia; confidence; duration of patient contact; suitability of screening tool; cost; disclosure; time; treatment and prognosis; and stigma. CONCLUSIONS: As for all screening programmes, screening for dementia raises complex issues around preference and choice for clinicians and the public, and it is unclear what specific factors promote or reduce screening acceptance the most. Overall, the level of evidence is low, few large scale studies have been undertaken and none were conducted in representative samples, all affecting the generalizability of identified themes across healthcare contexts. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that population screening for dementia may not be acceptable to either the general public or health care professionals, and highlight where focused efforts are needed to gain insights into dementia specific issues. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-015-0064-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4469007/ /pubmed/26076729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0064-6 Text en © Martin et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martin, Steven
Kelly, Sarah
Khan, Ayesha
Cullum, Sarah
Dening, Tom
Rait, Greta
Fox, Chris
Katona, Cornelius
Cosco, Theodore
Brayne, Carol
Lafortune, Louise
Attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature
title Attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort attitudes and preferences towards screening for dementia: a systematic review of the literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26076729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0064-6
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsteven attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT kellysarah attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT khanayesha attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT cullumsarah attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT deningtom attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT raitgreta attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT foxchris attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT katonacornelius attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT coscotheodore attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT braynecarol attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT lafortunelouise attitudesandpreferencestowardsscreeningfordementiaasystematicreviewoftheliterature