Cargando…

Pupil dilation using drops vs gel: a comparative study

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy in pupil dilation and degree of discomfort between topical instillation of mydriatic drops and gel. METHODS: The study included 60 patients with no previous ocular history of trauma and surgery. One eye was dilated with two drops (tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 1...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moisseiev, E, Loberman, D, Zunz, E, Kesler, A, Loewenstein, A, Mandelblum, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25857606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.47
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy in pupil dilation and degree of discomfort between topical instillation of mydriatic drops and gel. METHODS: The study included 60 patients with no previous ocular history of trauma and surgery. One eye was dilated with two drops (tropicamide 0.5% and phenylephrine 10%), and the other with one drop of gel (tropicamide 0.5%+phenylephrine 5%). Pupil size was measured by a Colvard pupillometer at baseline and 5, 15, 30, and 45 min following instillation. Pain upon instillation was measured by visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: There was no difference in pupil size at baseline. Use of the gel achieved greater mydriasis than drops (P=0.01), and was also associated with lower pain scores (P=0.003). In diabetic patients, pupil size was smaller at baseline and following instillation of drops and gel. Use of the gel achieved an even greater degree of pupil dilation in this subset of patients than drops (P=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Gel formulation achieved significantly greater pupil dilation than drops, despite a lower concentration of phenylephrine, and was also associated with significantly lower patient discomfort. This study is the first report of improved mydriatic efficacy in diabetic patients.