Cargando…

Computerized Decision Support Improves Medication Review Effectiveness: An Experiment Evaluating the STRIP Assistant’s Usability

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy poses threats to patients’ health. The Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP) is a drug optimization process for conducting medication reviews in primary care. To effectively and efficiently incorporate this method into daily practice, the STRIP Assistan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meulendijk, Michiel C., Spruit, Marco R., Drenth-van Maanen, A. Clara, Numans, Mattijs E., Brinkkemper, Sjaak, Jansen, Paul A. F., Knol, Wilma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26025118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-015-0270-0
_version_ 1782376657952178176
author Meulendijk, Michiel C.
Spruit, Marco R.
Drenth-van Maanen, A. Clara
Numans, Mattijs E.
Brinkkemper, Sjaak
Jansen, Paul A. F.
Knol, Wilma
author_facet Meulendijk, Michiel C.
Spruit, Marco R.
Drenth-van Maanen, A. Clara
Numans, Mattijs E.
Brinkkemper, Sjaak
Jansen, Paul A. F.
Knol, Wilma
author_sort Meulendijk, Michiel C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy poses threats to patients’ health. The Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP) is a drug optimization process for conducting medication reviews in primary care. To effectively and efficiently incorporate this method into daily practice, the STRIP Assistant—a decision support system that aims to assist physicians with the pharmacotherapeutic analysis of patients’ medical records—has been developed. It generates context-specific advice based on clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the STRIP Assistant’s usability as a tool for physicians to optimize medical records for polypharmacy patients. METHODS: In an online experiment, 42 physicians were asked to optimize medical records for two comparable polypharmacy patients, one in their usual manner and one using the STRIP Assistant. Changes in effectiveness were measured by comparing respondents’ optimized medicine prescriptions with medication prepared by an expert panel of two geriatrician-pharmacologists. Efficiency was operationalized by recording the time the respondents took to optimize the two cases. User satisfaction was measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Independent and paired t tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Medication optimization significantly improved with the STRIP Assistant. Appropriate decisions increased from 58 % without the STRIP Assistant to 76 % with it (p < 0.0001). Inappropriate decisions decreased from 42 % without the STRIP Assistant to 24 % with it (p < 0.0001). Participants spent significantly more time optimizing medication with the STRIP Assistant (24 min) than without it (13 min; p < 0.0001). They assigned it a below-average SUS score of 63.25. CONCLUSION: The STRIP Assistant improves the effectiveness of medication reviews for polypharmacy patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4469772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44697722015-06-18 Computerized Decision Support Improves Medication Review Effectiveness: An Experiment Evaluating the STRIP Assistant’s Usability Meulendijk, Michiel C. Spruit, Marco R. Drenth-van Maanen, A. Clara Numans, Mattijs E. Brinkkemper, Sjaak Jansen, Paul A. F. Knol, Wilma Drugs Aging Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy poses threats to patients’ health. The Systematic Tool to Reduce Inappropriate Prescribing (STRIP) is a drug optimization process for conducting medication reviews in primary care. To effectively and efficiently incorporate this method into daily practice, the STRIP Assistant—a decision support system that aims to assist physicians with the pharmacotherapeutic analysis of patients’ medical records—has been developed. It generates context-specific advice based on clinical guidelines. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the STRIP Assistant’s usability as a tool for physicians to optimize medical records for polypharmacy patients. METHODS: In an online experiment, 42 physicians were asked to optimize medical records for two comparable polypharmacy patients, one in their usual manner and one using the STRIP Assistant. Changes in effectiveness were measured by comparing respondents’ optimized medicine prescriptions with medication prepared by an expert panel of two geriatrician-pharmacologists. Efficiency was operationalized by recording the time the respondents took to optimize the two cases. User satisfaction was measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Independent and paired t tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Medication optimization significantly improved with the STRIP Assistant. Appropriate decisions increased from 58 % without the STRIP Assistant to 76 % with it (p < 0.0001). Inappropriate decisions decreased from 42 % without the STRIP Assistant to 24 % with it (p < 0.0001). Participants spent significantly more time optimizing medication with the STRIP Assistant (24 min) than without it (13 min; p < 0.0001). They assigned it a below-average SUS score of 63.25. CONCLUSION: The STRIP Assistant improves the effectiveness of medication reviews for polypharmacy patients. Springer International Publishing 2015-05-30 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4469772/ /pubmed/26025118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-015-0270-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Meulendijk, Michiel C.
Spruit, Marco R.
Drenth-van Maanen, A. Clara
Numans, Mattijs E.
Brinkkemper, Sjaak
Jansen, Paul A. F.
Knol, Wilma
Computerized Decision Support Improves Medication Review Effectiveness: An Experiment Evaluating the STRIP Assistant’s Usability
title Computerized Decision Support Improves Medication Review Effectiveness: An Experiment Evaluating the STRIP Assistant’s Usability
title_full Computerized Decision Support Improves Medication Review Effectiveness: An Experiment Evaluating the STRIP Assistant’s Usability
title_fullStr Computerized Decision Support Improves Medication Review Effectiveness: An Experiment Evaluating the STRIP Assistant’s Usability
title_full_unstemmed Computerized Decision Support Improves Medication Review Effectiveness: An Experiment Evaluating the STRIP Assistant’s Usability
title_short Computerized Decision Support Improves Medication Review Effectiveness: An Experiment Evaluating the STRIP Assistant’s Usability
title_sort computerized decision support improves medication review effectiveness: an experiment evaluating the strip assistant’s usability
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26025118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-015-0270-0
work_keys_str_mv AT meulendijkmichielc computerizeddecisionsupportimprovesmedicationrevieweffectivenessanexperimentevaluatingthestripassistantsusability
AT spruitmarcor computerizeddecisionsupportimprovesmedicationrevieweffectivenessanexperimentevaluatingthestripassistantsusability
AT drenthvanmaanenaclara computerizeddecisionsupportimprovesmedicationrevieweffectivenessanexperimentevaluatingthestripassistantsusability
AT numansmattijse computerizeddecisionsupportimprovesmedicationrevieweffectivenessanexperimentevaluatingthestripassistantsusability
AT brinkkempersjaak computerizeddecisionsupportimprovesmedicationrevieweffectivenessanexperimentevaluatingthestripassistantsusability
AT jansenpaulaf computerizeddecisionsupportimprovesmedicationrevieweffectivenessanexperimentevaluatingthestripassistantsusability
AT knolwilma computerizeddecisionsupportimprovesmedicationrevieweffectivenessanexperimentevaluatingthestripassistantsusability