Cost Effectiveness of Sequencing 34 Cancer-Associated Genes as an Aid for Treatment Selection in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 34 cancer-associated genes would cost-effectively aid in the treatment selection for patients with metastatic melanoma, compared with a single-site BRAF V600 mutation test. METHODS: A decision model was developed to estimate the costs and health outcomes of the two test strategies. The cost effectiveness of these two strategies was analyzed from a payer perspective over a 2-year time horizon with model parameters taken from the literature. RESULTS: In the base case, the gene sequencing panel strategy resulted in a cost of US$120,022 and 0.721 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient, whereas the single-site mutation test strategy resulted in a cost of US$128,965 and 0.704 QALYs. Thus, the gene sequencing panel strategy cost US$8943 less per patient and increased QALYs by 0.0174 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that, compared with the single-site mutation test strategy, the gene sequencing panel strategy had a 90.9 % chance of having reduced costs and increased QALYs, with the cost of the gene sequencing panel test having minimal effect on the incremental cost. CONCLUSION: Compared with the single-site mutation test, the use of an NGS panel of 34 cancer-associated genes as an aid in selecting therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma reduced costs and increased QALYs. If the base-case results were applied to the 8900 patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma in the USA each year, the gene sequencing panel strategy could result in an annual savings of US$79.6 million and a gain of 155 QALYs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40291-015-0140-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.