Cargando…

Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal

BACKGROUND: Local pharmaceutical production has been endorsed by the WHO as a means of addressing health priorities of developing countries. However, local producers of essential medicines must comply with international pharmaceutical standards in order to be eligible to compete in donor tenders. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brhlikova, Petra, Harper, Ian, Subedi, Madhusudan, Bhattarai, Samita, Rawal, Nabin, Pollock, Allyson M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26072308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0110-3
_version_ 1782376688732078080
author Brhlikova, Petra
Harper, Ian
Subedi, Madhusudan
Bhattarai, Samita
Rawal, Nabin
Pollock, Allyson M.
author_facet Brhlikova, Petra
Harper, Ian
Subedi, Madhusudan
Bhattarai, Samita
Rawal, Nabin
Pollock, Allyson M.
author_sort Brhlikova, Petra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Local pharmaceutical production has been endorsed by the WHO as a means of addressing health priorities of developing countries. However, local producers of essential medicines must comply with international pharmaceutical standards in order to be eligible to compete in donor tenders. These standards determine production rights for on-patent and off-patent medicines, and guide international procurement of medicines. We reviewed the literature on the impact of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) on local production; a gap analysis from the literature review indicated a need for further research. Over sixty interviews were conducted with people involved in the Nepali pharmaceutical production and distribution chain from 2006 to 2009 on the GMP areas of relevance: regulatory capacity, staffing, funding and training, resourcing of GMP, inspectors’ interpretation of the rules and compliance. RESULTS: Although Nepal producers have increased their overall share of the domestic market, only the public manufacturer, Royal Drugs, focuses on medicines for public health programmes; private producers engage mainly in brand competition for private markets, not essential medicines. Nepali regulators and producers state that implementation of GMP standards is hindered by low regulatory capacity, insufficient training of staff in the industry, financial constraints and lack of investment for upgrading capital. The transition period to mandatory compliance with WHO GMP rules is lengthy. Less than half of private producers had WHO GMP in 2013. Producers are not directly affected by international harmonisation of standards as they do not export medicines and the Nepali regulator does not enforce the WHO standards strictly. Without an international GMP certificate they cannot tender for donor dependent health programmes. CONCLUSIONS: In Nepal, local private manufacturers focus mainly on brand competition for private consumption not essential medicines, the government preferentially procures essential medicines from the only public producer while donor funded programmes rely on international manufacturers compliant with international GMP standards. We also found evidence of private hospitals bypassing national medicines approvals process. Policies in support of local pharmaceutical production in developing countries as a source of essential medicines need to examine carefully how GMP regulations impact on regulators, local industry and production of essential medicines in practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4470019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44700192015-06-18 Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal Brhlikova, Petra Harper, Ian Subedi, Madhusudan Bhattarai, Samita Rawal, Nabin Pollock, Allyson M. Global Health Research BACKGROUND: Local pharmaceutical production has been endorsed by the WHO as a means of addressing health priorities of developing countries. However, local producers of essential medicines must comply with international pharmaceutical standards in order to be eligible to compete in donor tenders. These standards determine production rights for on-patent and off-patent medicines, and guide international procurement of medicines. We reviewed the literature on the impact of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) on local production; a gap analysis from the literature review indicated a need for further research. Over sixty interviews were conducted with people involved in the Nepali pharmaceutical production and distribution chain from 2006 to 2009 on the GMP areas of relevance: regulatory capacity, staffing, funding and training, resourcing of GMP, inspectors’ interpretation of the rules and compliance. RESULTS: Although Nepal producers have increased their overall share of the domestic market, only the public manufacturer, Royal Drugs, focuses on medicines for public health programmes; private producers engage mainly in brand competition for private markets, not essential medicines. Nepali regulators and producers state that implementation of GMP standards is hindered by low regulatory capacity, insufficient training of staff in the industry, financial constraints and lack of investment for upgrading capital. The transition period to mandatory compliance with WHO GMP rules is lengthy. Less than half of private producers had WHO GMP in 2013. Producers are not directly affected by international harmonisation of standards as they do not export medicines and the Nepali regulator does not enforce the WHO standards strictly. Without an international GMP certificate they cannot tender for donor dependent health programmes. CONCLUSIONS: In Nepal, local private manufacturers focus mainly on brand competition for private consumption not essential medicines, the government preferentially procures essential medicines from the only public producer while donor funded programmes rely on international manufacturers compliant with international GMP standards. We also found evidence of private hospitals bypassing national medicines approvals process. Policies in support of local pharmaceutical production in developing countries as a source of essential medicines need to examine carefully how GMP regulations impact on regulators, local industry and production of essential medicines in practice. BioMed Central 2015-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4470019/ /pubmed/26072308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0110-3 Text en © Brhlikova et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Brhlikova, Petra
Harper, Ian
Subedi, Madhusudan
Bhattarai, Samita
Rawal, Nabin
Pollock, Allyson M.
Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal
title Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal
title_full Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal
title_fullStr Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal
title_short Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal
title_sort aid conditionalities, international good manufacturing practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in nepal
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26072308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0110-3
work_keys_str_mv AT brhlikovapetra aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal
AT harperian aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal
AT subedimadhusudan aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal
AT bhattaraisamita aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal
AT rawalnabin aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal
AT pollockallysonm aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal