Cargando…
Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal
BACKGROUND: Local pharmaceutical production has been endorsed by the WHO as a means of addressing health priorities of developing countries. However, local producers of essential medicines must comply with international pharmaceutical standards in order to be eligible to compete in donor tenders. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26072308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0110-3 |
_version_ | 1782376688732078080 |
---|---|
author | Brhlikova, Petra Harper, Ian Subedi, Madhusudan Bhattarai, Samita Rawal, Nabin Pollock, Allyson M. |
author_facet | Brhlikova, Petra Harper, Ian Subedi, Madhusudan Bhattarai, Samita Rawal, Nabin Pollock, Allyson M. |
author_sort | Brhlikova, Petra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Local pharmaceutical production has been endorsed by the WHO as a means of addressing health priorities of developing countries. However, local producers of essential medicines must comply with international pharmaceutical standards in order to be eligible to compete in donor tenders. These standards determine production rights for on-patent and off-patent medicines, and guide international procurement of medicines. We reviewed the literature on the impact of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) on local production; a gap analysis from the literature review indicated a need for further research. Over sixty interviews were conducted with people involved in the Nepali pharmaceutical production and distribution chain from 2006 to 2009 on the GMP areas of relevance: regulatory capacity, staffing, funding and training, resourcing of GMP, inspectors’ interpretation of the rules and compliance. RESULTS: Although Nepal producers have increased their overall share of the domestic market, only the public manufacturer, Royal Drugs, focuses on medicines for public health programmes; private producers engage mainly in brand competition for private markets, not essential medicines. Nepali regulators and producers state that implementation of GMP standards is hindered by low regulatory capacity, insufficient training of staff in the industry, financial constraints and lack of investment for upgrading capital. The transition period to mandatory compliance with WHO GMP rules is lengthy. Less than half of private producers had WHO GMP in 2013. Producers are not directly affected by international harmonisation of standards as they do not export medicines and the Nepali regulator does not enforce the WHO standards strictly. Without an international GMP certificate they cannot tender for donor dependent health programmes. CONCLUSIONS: In Nepal, local private manufacturers focus mainly on brand competition for private consumption not essential medicines, the government preferentially procures essential medicines from the only public producer while donor funded programmes rely on international manufacturers compliant with international GMP standards. We also found evidence of private hospitals bypassing national medicines approvals process. Policies in support of local pharmaceutical production in developing countries as a source of essential medicines need to examine carefully how GMP regulations impact on regulators, local industry and production of essential medicines in practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4470019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44700192015-06-18 Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal Brhlikova, Petra Harper, Ian Subedi, Madhusudan Bhattarai, Samita Rawal, Nabin Pollock, Allyson M. Global Health Research BACKGROUND: Local pharmaceutical production has been endorsed by the WHO as a means of addressing health priorities of developing countries. However, local producers of essential medicines must comply with international pharmaceutical standards in order to be eligible to compete in donor tenders. These standards determine production rights for on-patent and off-patent medicines, and guide international procurement of medicines. We reviewed the literature on the impact of Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) on local production; a gap analysis from the literature review indicated a need for further research. Over sixty interviews were conducted with people involved in the Nepali pharmaceutical production and distribution chain from 2006 to 2009 on the GMP areas of relevance: regulatory capacity, staffing, funding and training, resourcing of GMP, inspectors’ interpretation of the rules and compliance. RESULTS: Although Nepal producers have increased their overall share of the domestic market, only the public manufacturer, Royal Drugs, focuses on medicines for public health programmes; private producers engage mainly in brand competition for private markets, not essential medicines. Nepali regulators and producers state that implementation of GMP standards is hindered by low regulatory capacity, insufficient training of staff in the industry, financial constraints and lack of investment for upgrading capital. The transition period to mandatory compliance with WHO GMP rules is lengthy. Less than half of private producers had WHO GMP in 2013. Producers are not directly affected by international harmonisation of standards as they do not export medicines and the Nepali regulator does not enforce the WHO standards strictly. Without an international GMP certificate they cannot tender for donor dependent health programmes. CONCLUSIONS: In Nepal, local private manufacturers focus mainly on brand competition for private consumption not essential medicines, the government preferentially procures essential medicines from the only public producer while donor funded programmes rely on international manufacturers compliant with international GMP standards. We also found evidence of private hospitals bypassing national medicines approvals process. Policies in support of local pharmaceutical production in developing countries as a source of essential medicines need to examine carefully how GMP regulations impact on regulators, local industry and production of essential medicines in practice. BioMed Central 2015-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4470019/ /pubmed/26072308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0110-3 Text en © Brhlikova et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Brhlikova, Petra Harper, Ian Subedi, Madhusudan Bhattarai, Samita Rawal, Nabin Pollock, Allyson M. Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal |
title | Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal |
title_full | Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal |
title_fullStr | Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal |
title_full_unstemmed | Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal |
title_short | Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal |
title_sort | aid conditionalities, international good manufacturing practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in nepal |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26072308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-015-0110-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brhlikovapetra aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal AT harperian aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal AT subedimadhusudan aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal AT bhattaraisamita aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal AT rawalnabin aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal AT pollockallysonm aidconditionalitiesinternationalgoodmanufacturingpracticestandardsandlocalproductionrightsacasestudyoflocalproductioninnepal |