Cargando…
26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening
BACKGROUND: The most common cause of implant failure is aseptic loosening (AL), followed by prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study evaluates the incidence of PJI among patients operated with suspected AL and whether the diagnosis of PJI was predictive of subsequent implant failure including re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26084830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0976-y |
_version_ | 1782376697112297472 |
---|---|
author | Fernandez-Sampedro, Marta Salas-Venero, Carlos Fariñas-Álvarez, Concepción Sumillera, Manuel Pérez-Carro, Luis Fakkas-Fernandez, Michel Gómez-Román, Javier Martínez-Martínez, Luis Fariñas, María Carmen |
author_facet | Fernandez-Sampedro, Marta Salas-Venero, Carlos Fariñas-Álvarez, Concepción Sumillera, Manuel Pérez-Carro, Luis Fakkas-Fernandez, Michel Gómez-Román, Javier Martínez-Martínez, Luis Fariñas, María Carmen |
author_sort | Fernandez-Sampedro, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The most common cause of implant failure is aseptic loosening (AL), followed by prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study evaluates the incidence of PJI among patients operated with suspected AL and whether the diagnosis of PJI was predictive of subsequent implant failure including re-infection, at 2 years of follow up. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty due to presumed AL from February 2009 to September 2011 were prospectively evaluated. A sonication fluid of prosthesis and tissue samples for microbiology and histopathology at the time of the surgery were collected. Implant failure include recurrent or persistent infection, reoperation for any reason or need for chronic antibiotic suppression. RESULTS: Of 198 patients with pre-and intraoperative diagnosis of AL, 24 (12.1 %) had postoperative diagnosis of PJI. After a follow up of 31 months (IQR: 21 to 38 months), 9 (37.5 %) of 24 patients in the PJI group had implant failure compared to only 1 (1.1 %) in the 198 of AL group (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity of sonicate fluid culture (>20 CFU) and peri-prosthetic tissue culture were 87.5 % vs 66.7 %, respectively. Specificities were 100 % for both techniques (95 % CI, 97.9–100 %). A greater number of patients with PJI (79.1 %) had previous partial arthroplasty revisions than those patients in the AL group (56.9 %) (p = 0.04). In addition, 5 (55.5 %) patients with PJI and implant failure had more revision arthroplasties during the first year after the last implant placement than those patients with PJI without implant failure (1 patient; 6.7 %) (RR 3.8; 95 % CI 1.4-10.1; p = 0.015). On the other hand, 6 (25 %) patients finally diagnosed of PJI were initially diagnosed of AL in the first year after primary arthroplasty, whereas it was only 16 (9.2 %) patients in the group of true AL (RR 2.7; 95 % CI 1.2–6.1; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: More than one tenth of patients with suspected AL are misdiagnosed PJI. Positive histology and positive peri-implant tissue and sonicate fluid cultures are highly predictive of implant failure in patients with PJI. Patients with greater number of partial hip revisions for a presumed AL had more risk of PJI. Early loosening is more often caused by hidden PJI than late loosening. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4470055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44700552015-06-18 26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening Fernandez-Sampedro, Marta Salas-Venero, Carlos Fariñas-Álvarez, Concepción Sumillera, Manuel Pérez-Carro, Luis Fakkas-Fernandez, Michel Gómez-Román, Javier Martínez-Martínez, Luis Fariñas, María Carmen BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: The most common cause of implant failure is aseptic loosening (AL), followed by prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study evaluates the incidence of PJI among patients operated with suspected AL and whether the diagnosis of PJI was predictive of subsequent implant failure including re-infection, at 2 years of follow up. METHODS: Patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty due to presumed AL from February 2009 to September 2011 were prospectively evaluated. A sonication fluid of prosthesis and tissue samples for microbiology and histopathology at the time of the surgery were collected. Implant failure include recurrent or persistent infection, reoperation for any reason or need for chronic antibiotic suppression. RESULTS: Of 198 patients with pre-and intraoperative diagnosis of AL, 24 (12.1 %) had postoperative diagnosis of PJI. After a follow up of 31 months (IQR: 21 to 38 months), 9 (37.5 %) of 24 patients in the PJI group had implant failure compared to only 1 (1.1 %) in the 198 of AL group (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity of sonicate fluid culture (>20 CFU) and peri-prosthetic tissue culture were 87.5 % vs 66.7 %, respectively. Specificities were 100 % for both techniques (95 % CI, 97.9–100 %). A greater number of patients with PJI (79.1 %) had previous partial arthroplasty revisions than those patients in the AL group (56.9 %) (p = 0.04). In addition, 5 (55.5 %) patients with PJI and implant failure had more revision arthroplasties during the first year after the last implant placement than those patients with PJI without implant failure (1 patient; 6.7 %) (RR 3.8; 95 % CI 1.4-10.1; p = 0.015). On the other hand, 6 (25 %) patients finally diagnosed of PJI were initially diagnosed of AL in the first year after primary arthroplasty, whereas it was only 16 (9.2 %) patients in the group of true AL (RR 2.7; 95 % CI 1.2–6.1; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: More than one tenth of patients with suspected AL are misdiagnosed PJI. Positive histology and positive peri-implant tissue and sonicate fluid cultures are highly predictive of implant failure in patients with PJI. Patients with greater number of partial hip revisions for a presumed AL had more risk of PJI. Early loosening is more often caused by hidden PJI than late loosening. BioMed Central 2015-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4470055/ /pubmed/26084830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0976-y Text en © Fernandez-Sampedro et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fernandez-Sampedro, Marta Salas-Venero, Carlos Fariñas-Álvarez, Concepción Sumillera, Manuel Pérez-Carro, Luis Fakkas-Fernandez, Michel Gómez-Román, Javier Martínez-Martínez, Luis Fariñas, María Carmen 26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening |
title | 26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening |
title_full | 26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening |
title_fullStr | 26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening |
title_full_unstemmed | 26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening |
title_short | 26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening |
title_sort | 26postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26084830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0976-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezsampedromarta 26postoperativediagnosisandoutcomeinpatientswithrevisionarthroplastyforasepticloosening AT salasvenerocarlos 26postoperativediagnosisandoutcomeinpatientswithrevisionarthroplastyforasepticloosening AT farinasalvarezconcepcion 26postoperativediagnosisandoutcomeinpatientswithrevisionarthroplastyforasepticloosening AT sumilleramanuel 26postoperativediagnosisandoutcomeinpatientswithrevisionarthroplastyforasepticloosening AT perezcarroluis 26postoperativediagnosisandoutcomeinpatientswithrevisionarthroplastyforasepticloosening AT fakkasfernandezmichel 26postoperativediagnosisandoutcomeinpatientswithrevisionarthroplastyforasepticloosening AT gomezromanjavier 26postoperativediagnosisandoutcomeinpatientswithrevisionarthroplastyforasepticloosening AT martinezmartinezluis 26postoperativediagnosisandoutcomeinpatientswithrevisionarthroplastyforasepticloosening AT farinasmariacarmen 26postoperativediagnosisandoutcomeinpatientswithrevisionarthroplastyforasepticloosening |