Cargando…
Systematic narrative review of decision frameworks to select the appropriate modelling approaches for health economic evaluations
BACKGROUND: In constructing or appraising a health economic model, an early consideration is whether the modelling approach selected is appropriate for the given decision problem. Frameworks and taxonomies that distinguish between modelling approaches can help make this decision more systematic and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26081877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1202-0 |
_version_ | 1782376700937502720 |
---|---|
author | Tsoi, B O’Reilly, D Jegathisawaran, J Tarride, J-E Blackhouse, G Goeree, R |
author_facet | Tsoi, B O’Reilly, D Jegathisawaran, J Tarride, J-E Blackhouse, G Goeree, R |
author_sort | Tsoi, B |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In constructing or appraising a health economic model, an early consideration is whether the modelling approach selected is appropriate for the given decision problem. Frameworks and taxonomies that distinguish between modelling approaches can help make this decision more systematic and this study aims to identify and compare the decision frameworks proposed to date on this topic area. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify frameworks from peer-reviewed and grey literature sources. The following databases were searched: OVID Medline and EMBASE; Wiley’s Cochrane Library and Health Economic Evaluation Database; PubMed; and ProQuest. RESULTS: Eight decision frameworks were identified, each focused on a different set of modelling approaches and employing a different collection of selection criterion. The selection criteria can be categorized as either: (i) structural features (i.e. technical elements that are factual in nature) or (ii) practical considerations (i.e. context-dependent attributes). The most commonly mentioned structural features were population resolution (i.e. aggregate vs. individual) and interactivity (i.e. static vs. dynamic). Furthermore, understanding the needs of the end-users and stakeholders was frequently incorporated as a criterion within these frameworks. CONCLUSIONS: There is presently no universally-accepted framework for selecting an economic modelling approach. Rather, each highlights different criteria that may be of importance when determining whether a modelling approach is appropriate. Further discussion is thus necessary as the modelling approach selected will impact the validity of the underlying economic model and have downstream implications on its efficiency, transparency and relevance to decision-makers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1202-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4470071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44700712015-06-18 Systematic narrative review of decision frameworks to select the appropriate modelling approaches for health economic evaluations Tsoi, B O’Reilly, D Jegathisawaran, J Tarride, J-E Blackhouse, G Goeree, R BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: In constructing or appraising a health economic model, an early consideration is whether the modelling approach selected is appropriate for the given decision problem. Frameworks and taxonomies that distinguish between modelling approaches can help make this decision more systematic and this study aims to identify and compare the decision frameworks proposed to date on this topic area. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify frameworks from peer-reviewed and grey literature sources. The following databases were searched: OVID Medline and EMBASE; Wiley’s Cochrane Library and Health Economic Evaluation Database; PubMed; and ProQuest. RESULTS: Eight decision frameworks were identified, each focused on a different set of modelling approaches and employing a different collection of selection criterion. The selection criteria can be categorized as either: (i) structural features (i.e. technical elements that are factual in nature) or (ii) practical considerations (i.e. context-dependent attributes). The most commonly mentioned structural features were population resolution (i.e. aggregate vs. individual) and interactivity (i.e. static vs. dynamic). Furthermore, understanding the needs of the end-users and stakeholders was frequently incorporated as a criterion within these frameworks. CONCLUSIONS: There is presently no universally-accepted framework for selecting an economic modelling approach. Rather, each highlights different criteria that may be of importance when determining whether a modelling approach is appropriate. Further discussion is thus necessary as the modelling approach selected will impact the validity of the underlying economic model and have downstream implications on its efficiency, transparency and relevance to decision-makers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1202-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4470071/ /pubmed/26081877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1202-0 Text en © Tsoi et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tsoi, B O’Reilly, D Jegathisawaran, J Tarride, J-E Blackhouse, G Goeree, R Systematic narrative review of decision frameworks to select the appropriate modelling approaches for health economic evaluations |
title | Systematic narrative review of decision frameworks to select the appropriate modelling approaches for health economic evaluations |
title_full | Systematic narrative review of decision frameworks to select the appropriate modelling approaches for health economic evaluations |
title_fullStr | Systematic narrative review of decision frameworks to select the appropriate modelling approaches for health economic evaluations |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic narrative review of decision frameworks to select the appropriate modelling approaches for health economic evaluations |
title_short | Systematic narrative review of decision frameworks to select the appropriate modelling approaches for health economic evaluations |
title_sort | systematic narrative review of decision frameworks to select the appropriate modelling approaches for health economic evaluations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26081877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1202-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsoib systematicnarrativereviewofdecisionframeworkstoselecttheappropriatemodellingapproachesforhealtheconomicevaluations AT oreillyd systematicnarrativereviewofdecisionframeworkstoselecttheappropriatemodellingapproachesforhealtheconomicevaluations AT jegathisawaranj systematicnarrativereviewofdecisionframeworkstoselecttheappropriatemodellingapproachesforhealtheconomicevaluations AT tarrideje systematicnarrativereviewofdecisionframeworkstoselecttheappropriatemodellingapproachesforhealtheconomicevaluations AT blackhouseg systematicnarrativereviewofdecisionframeworkstoselecttheappropriatemodellingapproachesforhealtheconomicevaluations AT goereer systematicnarrativereviewofdecisionframeworkstoselecttheappropriatemodellingapproachesforhealtheconomicevaluations |