Cargando…

“Let Me Hear Your Handwriting!” Evaluating the Movement Fluency from Its Sonification

The quality of handwriting is evaluated from the visual inspection of its legibility and not from the movement that generates the trace. Although handwriting is achieved in silence, adding sounds to handwriting movement might help towards its perception, provided that these sounds are meaningful. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danna, Jérémy, Paz-Villagrán, Vietminh, Gondre, Charles, Aramaki, Mitsuko, Kronland-Martinet, Richard, Ystad, Sølvi, Velay, Jean-Luc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26083384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128388
_version_ 1782376775254278144
author Danna, Jérémy
Paz-Villagrán, Vietminh
Gondre, Charles
Aramaki, Mitsuko
Kronland-Martinet, Richard
Ystad, Sølvi
Velay, Jean-Luc
author_facet Danna, Jérémy
Paz-Villagrán, Vietminh
Gondre, Charles
Aramaki, Mitsuko
Kronland-Martinet, Richard
Ystad, Sølvi
Velay, Jean-Luc
author_sort Danna, Jérémy
collection PubMed
description The quality of handwriting is evaluated from the visual inspection of its legibility and not from the movement that generates the trace. Although handwriting is achieved in silence, adding sounds to handwriting movement might help towards its perception, provided that these sounds are meaningful. This study evaluated the ability to judge handwriting quality from the auditory perception of the underlying sonified movement, without seeing the written trace. In a first experiment, samples of a word written by children with dysgraphia, proficient children writers, and proficient adult writers were collected with a graphic tablet. Then, the pen velocity, the fluency, and the axial pen pressure were sonified in order to create forty-five audio files. In a second experiment, these files were presented to 48 adult listeners who had to mark the underlying unseen handwriting. In order to evaluate the relevance of the sonification strategy, two experimental conditions were compared. In a first ‘implicit’ condition, the listeners made their judgment without any knowledge of the mapping between the sounds and the handwriting variables. In a second ‘explicit’ condition, they knew what the sonified variables corresponded to and the evaluation criteria. Results showed that, under the implicit condition, two thirds of the listeners marked the three groups of writers differently. In the explicit condition, all listeners marked the dysgraphic handwriting lower than that of the two other groups. In a third experiment, the scores given from the auditory evaluation were compared to the scores given by 16 other adults from the visual evaluation of the trace. Results revealed that auditory evaluation was more relevant than the visual evaluation for evaluating a dysgraphic handwriting. Handwriting sonification might therefore be a relevant tool allowing a therapist to complete the visual assessment of the written trace by an auditory control of the handwriting movement quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4470513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44705132015-06-29 “Let Me Hear Your Handwriting!” Evaluating the Movement Fluency from Its Sonification Danna, Jérémy Paz-Villagrán, Vietminh Gondre, Charles Aramaki, Mitsuko Kronland-Martinet, Richard Ystad, Sølvi Velay, Jean-Luc PLoS One Research Article The quality of handwriting is evaluated from the visual inspection of its legibility and not from the movement that generates the trace. Although handwriting is achieved in silence, adding sounds to handwriting movement might help towards its perception, provided that these sounds are meaningful. This study evaluated the ability to judge handwriting quality from the auditory perception of the underlying sonified movement, without seeing the written trace. In a first experiment, samples of a word written by children with dysgraphia, proficient children writers, and proficient adult writers were collected with a graphic tablet. Then, the pen velocity, the fluency, and the axial pen pressure were sonified in order to create forty-five audio files. In a second experiment, these files were presented to 48 adult listeners who had to mark the underlying unseen handwriting. In order to evaluate the relevance of the sonification strategy, two experimental conditions were compared. In a first ‘implicit’ condition, the listeners made their judgment without any knowledge of the mapping between the sounds and the handwriting variables. In a second ‘explicit’ condition, they knew what the sonified variables corresponded to and the evaluation criteria. Results showed that, under the implicit condition, two thirds of the listeners marked the three groups of writers differently. In the explicit condition, all listeners marked the dysgraphic handwriting lower than that of the two other groups. In a third experiment, the scores given from the auditory evaluation were compared to the scores given by 16 other adults from the visual evaluation of the trace. Results revealed that auditory evaluation was more relevant than the visual evaluation for evaluating a dysgraphic handwriting. Handwriting sonification might therefore be a relevant tool allowing a therapist to complete the visual assessment of the written trace by an auditory control of the handwriting movement quality. Public Library of Science 2015-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4470513/ /pubmed/26083384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128388 Text en © 2015 Danna et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Danna, Jérémy
Paz-Villagrán, Vietminh
Gondre, Charles
Aramaki, Mitsuko
Kronland-Martinet, Richard
Ystad, Sølvi
Velay, Jean-Luc
“Let Me Hear Your Handwriting!” Evaluating the Movement Fluency from Its Sonification
title “Let Me Hear Your Handwriting!” Evaluating the Movement Fluency from Its Sonification
title_full “Let Me Hear Your Handwriting!” Evaluating the Movement Fluency from Its Sonification
title_fullStr “Let Me Hear Your Handwriting!” Evaluating the Movement Fluency from Its Sonification
title_full_unstemmed “Let Me Hear Your Handwriting!” Evaluating the Movement Fluency from Its Sonification
title_short “Let Me Hear Your Handwriting!” Evaluating the Movement Fluency from Its Sonification
title_sort “let me hear your handwriting!” evaluating the movement fluency from its sonification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4470513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26083384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128388
work_keys_str_mv AT dannajeremy letmehearyourhandwritingevaluatingthemovementfluencyfromitssonification
AT pazvillagranvietminh letmehearyourhandwritingevaluatingthemovementfluencyfromitssonification
AT gondrecharles letmehearyourhandwritingevaluatingthemovementfluencyfromitssonification
AT aramakimitsuko letmehearyourhandwritingevaluatingthemovementfluencyfromitssonification
AT kronlandmartinetrichard letmehearyourhandwritingevaluatingthemovementfluencyfromitssonification
AT ystadsølvi letmehearyourhandwritingevaluatingthemovementfluencyfromitssonification
AT velayjeanluc letmehearyourhandwritingevaluatingthemovementfluencyfromitssonification