Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Non-Invasive Fibrosis and Steatosis Tools, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) and Histology in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-invasive diagnostic methods for liver fibrosis predict clinical outcomes in viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We specifically evaluated prognostic value of non-invasive fibrosis methods in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) against hepatic veno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sebastiani, Giada, Alshaalan, Rasha, Wong, Philip, Rubino, Maria, Salman, Ayat, Metrakos, Peter, Deschenes, Marc, Ghali, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26083565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128774
_version_ 1782376874298572800
author Sebastiani, Giada
Alshaalan, Rasha
Wong, Philip
Rubino, Maria
Salman, Ayat
Metrakos, Peter
Deschenes, Marc
Ghali, Peter
author_facet Sebastiani, Giada
Alshaalan, Rasha
Wong, Philip
Rubino, Maria
Salman, Ayat
Metrakos, Peter
Deschenes, Marc
Ghali, Peter
author_sort Sebastiani, Giada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-invasive diagnostic methods for liver fibrosis predict clinical outcomes in viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We specifically evaluated prognostic value of non-invasive fibrosis methods in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) against hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and liver histology. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 148 consecutive patients who met the following criteria: transjugular liver biopsy with HVPG measurement; biopsy-proven NASH; absence of decompensation; AST-to-Platelets Ratio Index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), NAFLD fibrosis score, ultrasound, hepatic steatosis index and Xenon-133 scan available within 6 months from biopsy; a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Outcomes were defined by death, liver transplantation, cirrhosis complications. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed to estimate incidence and predictors of outcomes, respectively. Prognostic value was expressed as area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5 years (interquartile range 3-8), 16.2% developed outcomes, including 7.4% who died or underwent liver transplantation. After adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, the following fibrosis tools predicted outcomes: HVPG >10mmHg (HR=9.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.07-30.12), histologic fibrosis F3-F4 (HR=3.14; 1.41-6.95), APRI >1.5 (HR=5.02; 1.6-15.7), FIB-4 >3.25 (HR=6.33; 1.98-20.2), NAFLD fibrosis score >0.676 (HR=11.9; 3.79-37.4). Prognostic value was as follows: histologic fibrosis stage, AUC=0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.93); HVPG, AUC=0.81 (0.70-0.91); APRI, AUC=0.89 (0.82-0.96); FIB-4, AUC=0.89 (0.83-0.95); NAFLD fibrosis score, AUC=0.79 (0.69-0.91). Neither histologic steatosis nor non-invasive steatosis methods predicted outcomes (AUC<0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive methods for liver fibrosis predict outcomes of patients with NASH. They could be used for serial monitoring, risk stratification and targeted interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4471234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44712342015-06-29 Prognostic Value of Non-Invasive Fibrosis and Steatosis Tools, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) and Histology in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Sebastiani, Giada Alshaalan, Rasha Wong, Philip Rubino, Maria Salman, Ayat Metrakos, Peter Deschenes, Marc Ghali, Peter PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-invasive diagnostic methods for liver fibrosis predict clinical outcomes in viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We specifically evaluated prognostic value of non-invasive fibrosis methods in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) against hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and liver histology. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 148 consecutive patients who met the following criteria: transjugular liver biopsy with HVPG measurement; biopsy-proven NASH; absence of decompensation; AST-to-Platelets Ratio Index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), NAFLD fibrosis score, ultrasound, hepatic steatosis index and Xenon-133 scan available within 6 months from biopsy; a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Outcomes were defined by death, liver transplantation, cirrhosis complications. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were employed to estimate incidence and predictors of outcomes, respectively. Prognostic value was expressed as area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5 years (interquartile range 3-8), 16.2% developed outcomes, including 7.4% who died or underwent liver transplantation. After adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, the following fibrosis tools predicted outcomes: HVPG >10mmHg (HR=9.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.07-30.12), histologic fibrosis F3-F4 (HR=3.14; 1.41-6.95), APRI >1.5 (HR=5.02; 1.6-15.7), FIB-4 >3.25 (HR=6.33; 1.98-20.2), NAFLD fibrosis score >0.676 (HR=11.9; 3.79-37.4). Prognostic value was as follows: histologic fibrosis stage, AUC=0.85 (95% CI 0.76-0.93); HVPG, AUC=0.81 (0.70-0.91); APRI, AUC=0.89 (0.82-0.96); FIB-4, AUC=0.89 (0.83-0.95); NAFLD fibrosis score, AUC=0.79 (0.69-0.91). Neither histologic steatosis nor non-invasive steatosis methods predicted outcomes (AUC<0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive methods for liver fibrosis predict outcomes of patients with NASH. They could be used for serial monitoring, risk stratification and targeted interventions. Public Library of Science 2015-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4471234/ /pubmed/26083565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128774 Text en © 2015 Sebastiani et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sebastiani, Giada
Alshaalan, Rasha
Wong, Philip
Rubino, Maria
Salman, Ayat
Metrakos, Peter
Deschenes, Marc
Ghali, Peter
Prognostic Value of Non-Invasive Fibrosis and Steatosis Tools, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) and Histology in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
title Prognostic Value of Non-Invasive Fibrosis and Steatosis Tools, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) and Histology in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
title_full Prognostic Value of Non-Invasive Fibrosis and Steatosis Tools, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) and Histology in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Non-Invasive Fibrosis and Steatosis Tools, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) and Histology in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Non-Invasive Fibrosis and Steatosis Tools, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) and Histology in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
title_short Prognostic Value of Non-Invasive Fibrosis and Steatosis Tools, Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) and Histology in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
title_sort prognostic value of non-invasive fibrosis and steatosis tools, hepatic venous pressure gradient (hvpg) and histology in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26083565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128774
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianigiada prognosticvalueofnoninvasivefibrosisandsteatosistoolshepaticvenouspressuregradienthvpgandhistologyinnonalcoholicsteatohepatitis
AT alshaalanrasha prognosticvalueofnoninvasivefibrosisandsteatosistoolshepaticvenouspressuregradienthvpgandhistologyinnonalcoholicsteatohepatitis
AT wongphilip prognosticvalueofnoninvasivefibrosisandsteatosistoolshepaticvenouspressuregradienthvpgandhistologyinnonalcoholicsteatohepatitis
AT rubinomaria prognosticvalueofnoninvasivefibrosisandsteatosistoolshepaticvenouspressuregradienthvpgandhistologyinnonalcoholicsteatohepatitis
AT salmanayat prognosticvalueofnoninvasivefibrosisandsteatosistoolshepaticvenouspressuregradienthvpgandhistologyinnonalcoholicsteatohepatitis
AT metrakospeter prognosticvalueofnoninvasivefibrosisandsteatosistoolshepaticvenouspressuregradienthvpgandhistologyinnonalcoholicsteatohepatitis
AT deschenesmarc prognosticvalueofnoninvasivefibrosisandsteatosistoolshepaticvenouspressuregradienthvpgandhistologyinnonalcoholicsteatohepatitis
AT ghalipeter prognosticvalueofnoninvasivefibrosisandsteatosistoolshepaticvenouspressuregradienthvpgandhistologyinnonalcoholicsteatohepatitis