Cargando…

What benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion?

This study investigated a relationship between rectum diameter and prostate motion during treatment with a view to reducing planning target volume (PTV) margins for an adaptive protocol. One hundred and ninety-four cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 10 patients were used to relate rectum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oates, Richard, Gill, Suki, Foroudi, Farshad, Joon, Michael Lim, Schneider, Michal, Bressel, Mathias, Kron, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150683
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.152237
_version_ 1782376945420337152
author Oates, Richard
Gill, Suki
Foroudi, Farshad
Joon, Michael Lim
Schneider, Michal
Bressel, Mathias
Kron, Tomas
author_facet Oates, Richard
Gill, Suki
Foroudi, Farshad
Joon, Michael Lim
Schneider, Michal
Bressel, Mathias
Kron, Tomas
author_sort Oates, Richard
collection PubMed
description This study investigated a relationship between rectum diameter and prostate motion during treatment with a view to reducing planning target volume (PTV) margins for an adaptive protocol. One hundred and ninety-four cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 10 patients were used to relate rectum diameter on CBCT to prostate intrafraction displacement. A threshold rectum diameter was used to model the impact of an adaptive PTV margin on rectum and bladder dose. Potential dose escalation with a 6 mm uniform margin adaptive protocol was compared to a PTV margin of 10 mm expansion of the clinical target volume (CTV) except 6 mm posterior. Of 194 fractions, 104 had a maximum rectal diameter of ≤3.5 cm. The prostate displaced ≤4 mm in 102 of those fractions. Changing from a standard to an adaptive PTV margin reduced the volume of rectum receiving 25, 50, 60, and 70 Gy by around 12, 9, 10, and 16%, respectively and bladder by approximately 21, 27, 29, and 35%, respectively. An average dose escalation of 4.2 Gy may be possible with an adaptive prostate radiotherapy protocol. In conclusion, a relationship between the prostate motion and the diameter of the rectum on CBCT potentially could enable daily adaptive radiotherapy which can be implemented from the first fraction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4471640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44716402015-07-06 What benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion? Oates, Richard Gill, Suki Foroudi, Farshad Joon, Michael Lim Schneider, Michal Bressel, Mathias Kron, Tomas J Med Phys Original Article This study investigated a relationship between rectum diameter and prostate motion during treatment with a view to reducing planning target volume (PTV) margins for an adaptive protocol. One hundred and ninety-four cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 10 patients were used to relate rectum diameter on CBCT to prostate intrafraction displacement. A threshold rectum diameter was used to model the impact of an adaptive PTV margin on rectum and bladder dose. Potential dose escalation with a 6 mm uniform margin adaptive protocol was compared to a PTV margin of 10 mm expansion of the clinical target volume (CTV) except 6 mm posterior. Of 194 fractions, 104 had a maximum rectal diameter of ≤3.5 cm. The prostate displaced ≤4 mm in 102 of those fractions. Changing from a standard to an adaptive PTV margin reduced the volume of rectum receiving 25, 50, 60, and 70 Gy by around 12, 9, 10, and 16%, respectively and bladder by approximately 21, 27, 29, and 35%, respectively. An average dose escalation of 4.2 Gy may be possible with an adaptive prostate radiotherapy protocol. In conclusion, a relationship between the prostate motion and the diameter of the rectum on CBCT potentially could enable daily adaptive radiotherapy which can be implemented from the first fraction. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4471640/ /pubmed/26150683 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.152237 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Oates, Richard
Gill, Suki
Foroudi, Farshad
Joon, Michael Lim
Schneider, Michal
Bressel, Mathias
Kron, Tomas
What benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion?
title What benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion?
title_full What benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion?
title_fullStr What benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion?
title_full_unstemmed What benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion?
title_short What benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion?
title_sort what benefit could be derived from on-line adaptive prostate radiotherapy using rectal diameter as a predictor of motion?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150683
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.152237
work_keys_str_mv AT oatesrichard whatbenefitcouldbederivedfromonlineadaptiveprostateradiotherapyusingrectaldiameterasapredictorofmotion
AT gillsuki whatbenefitcouldbederivedfromonlineadaptiveprostateradiotherapyusingrectaldiameterasapredictorofmotion
AT foroudifarshad whatbenefitcouldbederivedfromonlineadaptiveprostateradiotherapyusingrectaldiameterasapredictorofmotion
AT joonmichaellim whatbenefitcouldbederivedfromonlineadaptiveprostateradiotherapyusingrectaldiameterasapredictorofmotion
AT schneidermichal whatbenefitcouldbederivedfromonlineadaptiveprostateradiotherapyusingrectaldiameterasapredictorofmotion
AT bresselmathias whatbenefitcouldbederivedfromonlineadaptiveprostateradiotherapyusingrectaldiameterasapredictorofmotion
AT krontomas whatbenefitcouldbederivedfromonlineadaptiveprostateradiotherapyusingrectaldiameterasapredictorofmotion