Cargando…

Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose

Flat panel detector (FPD) technology in interventional cardiology is on the increase due to its varied advantages compared to the conventional image intensifier (II) systems. It is not clear whether FPD imparts lower radiation doses compared to II systems though a few studies support this finding. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livingstone, Roshan S., Chase, David, Varghese, Anna, George, Paul V., George, Oommen K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150684
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.152241
_version_ 1782376945731764224
author Livingstone, Roshan S.
Chase, David
Varghese, Anna
George, Paul V.
George, Oommen K.
author_facet Livingstone, Roshan S.
Chase, David
Varghese, Anna
George, Paul V.
George, Oommen K.
author_sort Livingstone, Roshan S.
collection PubMed
description Flat panel detector (FPD) technology in interventional cardiology is on the increase due to its varied advantages compared to the conventional image intensifier (II) systems. It is not clear whether FPD imparts lower radiation doses compared to II systems though a few studies support this finding. This study intends to compare radiation doses from II and FPD systems for coronaryangiography (CAG) and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) performed in a tertiary referral center. Radiation doses were measured using dose area product (DAP) meter from patients who underwent CAG (n = 222) and PTCA (n = 75) performed using FPD angiography system. The DAP values from FPD were compared with earlier reported data using II systems from the same referral center where the study was conducted. The mean DAP values from FPD system for CAG and PTCA were 24.35 and 63.64 Gycm(2) and those from II system were 27.71 and 65.44 Gycm(2). Transition from II to FPD system requires stringent dose optimization strategies right from the initial period of installation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4471641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44716412015-07-06 Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose Livingstone, Roshan S. Chase, David Varghese, Anna George, Paul V. George, Oommen K. J Med Phys Original Article Flat panel detector (FPD) technology in interventional cardiology is on the increase due to its varied advantages compared to the conventional image intensifier (II) systems. It is not clear whether FPD imparts lower radiation doses compared to II systems though a few studies support this finding. This study intends to compare radiation doses from II and FPD systems for coronaryangiography (CAG) and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) performed in a tertiary referral center. Radiation doses were measured using dose area product (DAP) meter from patients who underwent CAG (n = 222) and PTCA (n = 75) performed using FPD angiography system. The DAP values from FPD were compared with earlier reported data using II systems from the same referral center where the study was conducted. The mean DAP values from FPD system for CAG and PTCA were 24.35 and 63.64 Gycm(2) and those from II system were 27.71 and 65.44 Gycm(2). Transition from II to FPD system requires stringent dose optimization strategies right from the initial period of installation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4471641/ /pubmed/26150684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.152241 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Livingstone, Roshan S.
Chase, David
Varghese, Anna
George, Paul V.
George, Oommen K.
Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_full Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_fullStr Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_full_unstemmed Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_short Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
title_sort transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: impact of radiation dose
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150684
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.152241
work_keys_str_mv AT livingstoneroshans transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose
AT chasedavid transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose
AT vargheseanna transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose
AT georgepaulv transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose
AT georgeoommenk transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose