Cargando…
Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose
Flat panel detector (FPD) technology in interventional cardiology is on the increase due to its varied advantages compared to the conventional image intensifier (II) systems. It is not clear whether FPD imparts lower radiation doses compared to II systems though a few studies support this finding. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.152241 |
_version_ | 1782376945731764224 |
---|---|
author | Livingstone, Roshan S. Chase, David Varghese, Anna George, Paul V. George, Oommen K. |
author_facet | Livingstone, Roshan S. Chase, David Varghese, Anna George, Paul V. George, Oommen K. |
author_sort | Livingstone, Roshan S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Flat panel detector (FPD) technology in interventional cardiology is on the increase due to its varied advantages compared to the conventional image intensifier (II) systems. It is not clear whether FPD imparts lower radiation doses compared to II systems though a few studies support this finding. This study intends to compare radiation doses from II and FPD systems for coronaryangiography (CAG) and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) performed in a tertiary referral center. Radiation doses were measured using dose area product (DAP) meter from patients who underwent CAG (n = 222) and PTCA (n = 75) performed using FPD angiography system. The DAP values from FPD were compared with earlier reported data using II systems from the same referral center where the study was conducted. The mean DAP values from FPD system for CAG and PTCA were 24.35 and 63.64 Gycm(2) and those from II system were 27.71 and 65.44 Gycm(2). Transition from II to FPD system requires stringent dose optimization strategies right from the initial period of installation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4471641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44716412015-07-06 Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose Livingstone, Roshan S. Chase, David Varghese, Anna George, Paul V. George, Oommen K. J Med Phys Original Article Flat panel detector (FPD) technology in interventional cardiology is on the increase due to its varied advantages compared to the conventional image intensifier (II) systems. It is not clear whether FPD imparts lower radiation doses compared to II systems though a few studies support this finding. This study intends to compare radiation doses from II and FPD systems for coronaryangiography (CAG) and Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA) performed in a tertiary referral center. Radiation doses were measured using dose area product (DAP) meter from patients who underwent CAG (n = 222) and PTCA (n = 75) performed using FPD angiography system. The DAP values from FPD were compared with earlier reported data using II systems from the same referral center where the study was conducted. The mean DAP values from FPD system for CAG and PTCA were 24.35 and 63.64 Gycm(2) and those from II system were 27.71 and 65.44 Gycm(2). Transition from II to FPD system requires stringent dose optimization strategies right from the initial period of installation. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4471641/ /pubmed/26150684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.152241 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Livingstone, Roshan S. Chase, David Varghese, Anna George, Paul V. George, Oommen K. Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose |
title | Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose |
title_full | Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose |
title_fullStr | Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose |
title_full_unstemmed | Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose |
title_short | Transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: Impact of radiation dose |
title_sort | transition from image intensifier to flat panel detector in interventional cardiology: impact of radiation dose |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.152241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT livingstoneroshans transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose AT chasedavid transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose AT vargheseanna transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose AT georgepaulv transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose AT georgeoommenk transitionfromimageintensifiertoflatpaneldetectorininterventionalcardiologyimpactofradiationdose |