Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernard, Philippe, Gervais, Sarah J., Allen, Jill, Klein, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Psychology
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00845
_version_ 1782376990240669696
author Bernard, Philippe
Gervais, Sarah J.
Allen, Jill
Klein, Olivier
author_facet Bernard, Philippe
Gervais, Sarah J.
Allen, Jill
Klein, Olivier
author_sort Bernard, Philippe
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4471948
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44719482015-07-06 Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?” Bernard, Philippe Gervais, Sarah J. Allen, Jill Klein, Olivier Front Psychol Psychology Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4471948/ /pubmed/26150800 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00845 Text en Copyright © 2015 Bernard, Gervais, Allen and Klein. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Bernard, Philippe
Gervais, Sarah J.
Allen, Jill
Klein, Olivier
Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”
title Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”
title_full Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”
title_fullStr Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”
title_full_unstemmed Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”
title_short Commentary “The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”
title_sort commentary “the sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact?”
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471948/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26150800
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00845
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardphilippe commentarythesexualizedbodyinversionhypothesisrevisitedvalidindicatorofsexualobjectificationormethodologicalartifact
AT gervaissarahj commentarythesexualizedbodyinversionhypothesisrevisitedvalidindicatorofsexualobjectificationormethodologicalartifact
AT allenjill commentarythesexualizedbodyinversionhypothesisrevisitedvalidindicatorofsexualobjectificationormethodologicalartifact
AT kleinolivier commentarythesexualizedbodyinversionhypothesisrevisitedvalidindicatorofsexualobjectificationormethodologicalartifact

Ejemplares similares