Cargando…
Quality and Quantity of Published Studies Evaluating Lumbar Fusion during the Past 10 Years: A Systematic Review
Study Design Systematic review. Clinical Questions (1) Has the proportion and number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as an indicator of quality of evidence regarding lumbar fusion increased over the past 10 years? (2) Is there a difference in the proportion of RCTs among the four primary fusi...
Autores principales: | Hart, Robert, Hermsmeyer, Jeffrey T., Sethi, Rajiv K., Norvell, Daniel C. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26131387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1552984 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Chronic sacroiliac joint pain: fusion versus denervation as treatment options
por: Ashman, Bryan, et al.
Publicado: (2010) -
Efficacy of interspinous device versus surgical decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a modified network analysis
por: Chou, Dean, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
And, not or: Quality, quantity in scientific publishing
por: Michalska-Smith, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Efficacy of bracing versus observation in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis
por: Davies, Evan, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Persistent/Recurrent Syringomyelia after Chiari Decompression—Natural History and Management Strategies: A Systematic Review
por: Schuster, James M., et al.
Publicado: (2013)