Cargando…

Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts

The use of counts of unmarked migrating animals to monitor long term population trends assumes independence of daily counts and a constant rate of detection. However, migratory stopovers often last days or weeks, violating the assumption of count independence. Further, a systematic change in stopove...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crewe, Tara L., Taylor, Philip D., Lepage, Denis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26086796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130137
_version_ 1782377098600513536
author Crewe, Tara L.
Taylor, Philip D.
Lepage, Denis
author_facet Crewe, Tara L.
Taylor, Philip D.
Lepage, Denis
author_sort Crewe, Tara L.
collection PubMed
description The use of counts of unmarked migrating animals to monitor long term population trends assumes independence of daily counts and a constant rate of detection. However, migratory stopovers often last days or weeks, violating the assumption of count independence. Further, a systematic change in stopover duration will result in a change in the probability of detecting individuals once, but also in the probability of detecting individuals on more than one sampling occasion. We tested how variation in stopover duration influenced accuracy and precision of population trends by simulating migration count data with known constant rate of population change and by allowing daily probability of survival (an index of stopover duration) to remain constant, or to vary randomly, cyclically, or increase linearly over time by various levels. Using simulated datasets with a systematic increase in stopover duration, we also tested whether any resulting bias in population trend could be reduced by modeling the underlying source of variation in detection, or by subsampling data to every three or five days to reduce the incidence of recounting. Mean bias in population trend did not differ significantly from zero when stopover duration remained constant or varied randomly over time, but bias and the detection of false trends increased significantly with a systematic increase in stopover duration. Importantly, an increase in stopover duration over time resulted in a compounding effect on counts due to the increased probability of detection and of recounting on subsequent sampling occasions. Under this scenario, bias in population trend could not be modeled using a covariate for stopover duration alone. Rather, to improve inference drawn about long term population change using counts of unmarked migrants, analyses must include a covariate for stopover duration, as well as incorporate sampling modifications (e.g., subsampling) to reduce the probability that individuals will be detected on more than one occasion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4472725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44727252015-06-29 Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts Crewe, Tara L. Taylor, Philip D. Lepage, Denis PLoS One Research Article The use of counts of unmarked migrating animals to monitor long term population trends assumes independence of daily counts and a constant rate of detection. However, migratory stopovers often last days or weeks, violating the assumption of count independence. Further, a systematic change in stopover duration will result in a change in the probability of detecting individuals once, but also in the probability of detecting individuals on more than one sampling occasion. We tested how variation in stopover duration influenced accuracy and precision of population trends by simulating migration count data with known constant rate of population change and by allowing daily probability of survival (an index of stopover duration) to remain constant, or to vary randomly, cyclically, or increase linearly over time by various levels. Using simulated datasets with a systematic increase in stopover duration, we also tested whether any resulting bias in population trend could be reduced by modeling the underlying source of variation in detection, or by subsampling data to every three or five days to reduce the incidence of recounting. Mean bias in population trend did not differ significantly from zero when stopover duration remained constant or varied randomly over time, but bias and the detection of false trends increased significantly with a systematic increase in stopover duration. Importantly, an increase in stopover duration over time resulted in a compounding effect on counts due to the increased probability of detection and of recounting on subsequent sampling occasions. Under this scenario, bias in population trend could not be modeled using a covariate for stopover duration alone. Rather, to improve inference drawn about long term population change using counts of unmarked migrants, analyses must include a covariate for stopover duration, as well as incorporate sampling modifications (e.g., subsampling) to reduce the probability that individuals will be detected on more than one occasion. Public Library of Science 2015-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4472725/ /pubmed/26086796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130137 Text en © 2015 Crewe et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Crewe, Tara L.
Taylor, Philip D.
Lepage, Denis
Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts
title Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts
title_full Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts
title_fullStr Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts
title_short Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts
title_sort modeling systematic change in stopover duration does not improve bias in trends estimated from migration counts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26086796
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130137
work_keys_str_mv AT crewetaral modelingsystematicchangeinstopoverdurationdoesnotimprovebiasintrendsestimatedfrommigrationcounts
AT taylorphilipd modelingsystematicchangeinstopoverdurationdoesnotimprovebiasintrendsestimatedfrommigrationcounts
AT lepagedenis modelingsystematicchangeinstopoverdurationdoesnotimprovebiasintrendsestimatedfrommigrationcounts