Cargando…

A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth

Aim: To compare and evaluate the remineralizing potential of four commercially available products namely SHY-NM, GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. Materials and methods: The study included 50 extracted premolars having 3 × 3 mm window prepared on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rajan, Reshma, Krishnan, Ramesh, Bhaskaran, Bibin, Kumar, Suresh V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124580
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1281
_version_ 1782377134510047232
author Rajan, Reshma
Krishnan, Ramesh
Bhaskaran, Bibin
Kumar, Suresh V
author_facet Rajan, Reshma
Krishnan, Ramesh
Bhaskaran, Bibin
Kumar, Suresh V
author_sort Rajan, Reshma
collection PubMed
description Aim: To compare and evaluate the remineralizing potential of four commercially available products namely SHY-NM, GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. Materials and methods: The study included 50 extracted premolars having 3 × 3 mm window prepared on the middle third of the tooth, which was then subjected to demineralization for 48 hours at 37°C. Teeth were randomly selected and grouped into five study groups of 10 teeth in each. Each group was treated with respective remineralizing agent and sectioned using hard-tissue microtome. Each section obtained was visualized under polarized light microscope and analyzed using Image J software. Results: The statistically evaluated results revealed that SHY-NM has the most remineralizing potential followed by ReminPro, GC Tooth Mousse Plus and fluoridated toothpaste. Conclusion: Based on the study, the SHY-NM was superior to the GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. How to cite this article: Rajan R, Krishnan R, Bhaskaran B, Kumar SV. A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(1):42-47.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4472870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44728702015-06-29 A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth Rajan, Reshma Krishnan, Ramesh Bhaskaran, Bibin Kumar, Suresh V Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article Aim: To compare and evaluate the remineralizing potential of four commercially available products namely SHY-NM, GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. Materials and methods: The study included 50 extracted premolars having 3 × 3 mm window prepared on the middle third of the tooth, which was then subjected to demineralization for 48 hours at 37°C. Teeth were randomly selected and grouped into five study groups of 10 teeth in each. Each group was treated with respective remineralizing agent and sectioned using hard-tissue microtome. Each section obtained was visualized under polarized light microscope and analyzed using Image J software. Results: The statistically evaluated results revealed that SHY-NM has the most remineralizing potential followed by ReminPro, GC Tooth Mousse Plus and fluoridated toothpaste. Conclusion: Based on the study, the SHY-NM was superior to the GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. How to cite this article: Rajan R, Krishnan R, Bhaskaran B, Kumar SV. A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(1):42-47. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2015 2015-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4472870/ /pubmed/26124580 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1281 Text en Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Rajan, Reshma
Krishnan, Ramesh
Bhaskaran, Bibin
Kumar, Suresh V
A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth
title A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth
title_full A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth
title_fullStr A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth
title_full_unstemmed A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth
title_short A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth
title_sort polarized light microscopic study to comparatively evaluate four remineralizing agents on enamel viz cpp-acpf, reminpro, shy-nm and colgate strong teeth
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124580
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1281
work_keys_str_mv AT rajanreshma apolarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth
AT krishnanramesh apolarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth
AT bhaskaranbibin apolarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth
AT kumarsureshv apolarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth
AT rajanreshma polarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth
AT krishnanramesh polarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth
AT bhaskaranbibin polarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth
AT kumarsureshv polarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth