Cargando…
A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth
Aim: To compare and evaluate the remineralizing potential of four commercially available products namely SHY-NM, GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. Materials and methods: The study included 50 extracted premolars having 3 × 3 mm window prepared on t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124580 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1281 |
_version_ | 1782377134510047232 |
---|---|
author | Rajan, Reshma Krishnan, Ramesh Bhaskaran, Bibin Kumar, Suresh V |
author_facet | Rajan, Reshma Krishnan, Ramesh Bhaskaran, Bibin Kumar, Suresh V |
author_sort | Rajan, Reshma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: To compare and evaluate the remineralizing potential of four commercially available products namely SHY-NM, GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. Materials and methods: The study included 50 extracted premolars having 3 × 3 mm window prepared on the middle third of the tooth, which was then subjected to demineralization for 48 hours at 37°C. Teeth were randomly selected and grouped into five study groups of 10 teeth in each. Each group was treated with respective remineralizing agent and sectioned using hard-tissue microtome. Each section obtained was visualized under polarized light microscope and analyzed using Image J software. Results: The statistically evaluated results revealed that SHY-NM has the most remineralizing potential followed by ReminPro, GC Tooth Mousse Plus and fluoridated toothpaste. Conclusion: Based on the study, the SHY-NM was superior to the GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. How to cite this article: Rajan R, Krishnan R, Bhaskaran B, Kumar SV. A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(1):42-47. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4472870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44728702015-06-29 A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth Rajan, Reshma Krishnan, Ramesh Bhaskaran, Bibin Kumar, Suresh V Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article Aim: To compare and evaluate the remineralizing potential of four commercially available products namely SHY-NM, GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. Materials and methods: The study included 50 extracted premolars having 3 × 3 mm window prepared on the middle third of the tooth, which was then subjected to demineralization for 48 hours at 37°C. Teeth were randomly selected and grouped into five study groups of 10 teeth in each. Each group was treated with respective remineralizing agent and sectioned using hard-tissue microtome. Each section obtained was visualized under polarized light microscope and analyzed using Image J software. Results: The statistically evaluated results revealed that SHY-NM has the most remineralizing potential followed by ReminPro, GC Tooth Mousse Plus and fluoridated toothpaste. Conclusion: Based on the study, the SHY-NM was superior to the GC Tooth Mousse Plus, ReminPro and Colgate strong teeth on demineralized human teeth. How to cite this article: Rajan R, Krishnan R, Bhaskaran B, Kumar SV. A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2015;8(1):42-47. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2015 2015-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4472870/ /pubmed/26124580 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1281 Text en Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rajan, Reshma Krishnan, Ramesh Bhaskaran, Bibin Kumar, Suresh V A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth |
title | A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth |
title_full | A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth |
title_fullStr | A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth |
title_short | A Polarized Light Microscopic Study to Comparatively evaluate Four Remineralizing Agents on Enamel viz CPP-ACPF, ReminPro, SHY-NM and Colgate Strong Teeth |
title_sort | polarized light microscopic study to comparatively evaluate four remineralizing agents on enamel viz cpp-acpf, reminpro, shy-nm and colgate strong teeth |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124580 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajanreshma apolarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth AT krishnanramesh apolarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth AT bhaskaranbibin apolarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth AT kumarsureshv apolarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth AT rajanreshma polarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth AT krishnanramesh polarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth AT bhaskaranbibin polarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth AT kumarsureshv polarizedlightmicroscopicstudytocomparativelyevaluatefourremineralizingagentsonenamelvizcppacpfreminproshynmandcolgatestrongteeth |