Cargando…

Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pantazopoulos, C, Floros, I, Archontoulis, N, Xanthis, D, Barouxis, D, Iacovidou, N, Xanthos, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472914/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14254
_version_ 1782377145173016576
author Pantazopoulos, C
Floros, I
Archontoulis, N
Xanthis, D
Barouxis, D
Iacovidou, N
Xanthos, T
author_facet Pantazopoulos, C
Floros, I
Archontoulis, N
Xanthis, D
Barouxis, D
Iacovidou, N
Xanthos, T
author_sort Pantazopoulos, C
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4472914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44729142015-06-25 Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock Pantazopoulos, C Floros, I Archontoulis, N Xanthis, D Barouxis, D Iacovidou, N Xanthos, T Crit Care Poster Presentation BioMed Central 2015 2015-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4472914/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14254 Text en Copyright © 2015 Pantazopoulos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Poster Presentation
Pantazopoulos, C
Floros, I
Archontoulis, N
Xanthis, D
Barouxis, D
Iacovidou, N
Xanthos, T
Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock
title Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock
title_full Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock
title_fullStr Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock
title_short Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock
title_sort comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock
topic Poster Presentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472914/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14254
work_keys_str_mv AT pantazopoulosc comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock
AT florosi comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock
AT archontoulisn comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock
AT xanthisd comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock
AT barouxisd comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock
AT iacovidoun comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock
AT xanthost comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock