Cargando…
Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472914/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14254 |
_version_ | 1782377145173016576 |
---|---|
author | Pantazopoulos, C Floros, I Archontoulis, N Xanthis, D Barouxis, D Iacovidou, N Xanthos, T |
author_facet | Pantazopoulos, C Floros, I Archontoulis, N Xanthis, D Barouxis, D Iacovidou, N Xanthos, T |
author_sort | Pantazopoulos, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4472914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44729142015-06-25 Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock Pantazopoulos, C Floros, I Archontoulis, N Xanthis, D Barouxis, D Iacovidou, N Xanthos, T Crit Care Poster Presentation BioMed Central 2015 2015-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4472914/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14254 Text en Copyright © 2015 Pantazopoulos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Poster Presentation Pantazopoulos, C Floros, I Archontoulis, N Xanthis, D Barouxis, D Iacovidou, N Xanthos, T Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock |
title | Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock |
title_full | Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock |
title_fullStr | Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock |
title_short | Comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with Ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock |
title_sort | comparative study between fluidless resuscitation with permissive hypotension using the impedance threshold device versus aggressive fluid resuscitation with ringer lactate in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock |
topic | Poster Presentation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4472914/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc14254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pantazopoulosc comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock AT florosi comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock AT archontoulisn comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock AT xanthisd comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock AT barouxisd comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock AT iacovidoun comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock AT xanthost comparativestudybetweenfluidlessresuscitationwithpermissivehypotensionusingtheimpedancethresholddeviceversusaggressivefluidresuscitationwithringerlactateinaswinemodelofhemorrhagicshock |