Cargando…

Faecal microbiota of domestic cats fed raw whole chicks v. an extruded chicken-based diet

Extruded cat foods differ greatly in macronutrient distribution compared with wild-type diets (i.e. small mammals, reptiles, birds and insects). Based on the literature, this variability likely impacts faecal microbial populations. A completely randomised design was utilised to test the impacts of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerr, K. R., Dowd, S. E., Swanson, K. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4473156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26101591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2014.21
_version_ 1782377196874104832
author Kerr, K. R.
Dowd, S. E.
Swanson, K. S.
author_facet Kerr, K. R.
Dowd, S. E.
Swanson, K. S.
author_sort Kerr, K. R.
collection PubMed
description Extruded cat foods differ greatly in macronutrient distribution compared with wild-type diets (i.e. small mammals, reptiles, birds and insects). Based on the literature, this variability likely impacts faecal microbial populations. A completely randomised design was utilised to test the impacts of two dietary treatments on faecal microbial populations: (1) chicken-based extruded diet (EXT; n 3 cats) and (2) raw 1–3-d-old chicks (CHI; n 5 cats). Cats were adapted to diets for 10 d. Bacterial DNA was isolated from faecal samples and amplicons of the 16S rRNA V4–V6 region were generated and analysed by 454 pyrosequencing. Faeces of cats fed CHI had greater (P < 0·05) proportions of the following bacterial genera: unidentified Lachnospiraceae (15 v. 5 %), Peptococcus (9 v. 3 %) and Pseudobutyrivibrio (4 v. 1 %). Faeces of cats fed EXT had greater (P < 0·05) proportions of Faecalibacterium (1·0 v. 0·2 %) and Succinivibrio (1·2 v. < 0·1 %). Five genera, including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, were present in a majority of samples (two to three out of three) from cats fed EXT, but were not detected in the samples (zero of five) for cats fed CHI. These shifts in faecal bacterial populations compared with feeding a whole-prey diet may impact the functional capacities of the microbiota and its interaction with the host. Further research is warranted to determine the impacts of these shifts on long-term health of domestic cats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4473156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44731562015-06-22 Faecal microbiota of domestic cats fed raw whole chicks v. an extruded chicken-based diet Kerr, K. R. Dowd, S. E. Swanson, K. S. J Nutr Sci WALTHAM Supplement Extruded cat foods differ greatly in macronutrient distribution compared with wild-type diets (i.e. small mammals, reptiles, birds and insects). Based on the literature, this variability likely impacts faecal microbial populations. A completely randomised design was utilised to test the impacts of two dietary treatments on faecal microbial populations: (1) chicken-based extruded diet (EXT; n 3 cats) and (2) raw 1–3-d-old chicks (CHI; n 5 cats). Cats were adapted to diets for 10 d. Bacterial DNA was isolated from faecal samples and amplicons of the 16S rRNA V4–V6 region were generated and analysed by 454 pyrosequencing. Faeces of cats fed CHI had greater (P < 0·05) proportions of the following bacterial genera: unidentified Lachnospiraceae (15 v. 5 %), Peptococcus (9 v. 3 %) and Pseudobutyrivibrio (4 v. 1 %). Faeces of cats fed EXT had greater (P < 0·05) proportions of Faecalibacterium (1·0 v. 0·2 %) and Succinivibrio (1·2 v. < 0·1 %). Five genera, including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, were present in a majority of samples (two to three out of three) from cats fed EXT, but were not detected in the samples (zero of five) for cats fed CHI. These shifts in faecal bacterial populations compared with feeding a whole-prey diet may impact the functional capacities of the microbiota and its interaction with the host. Further research is warranted to determine the impacts of these shifts on long-term health of domestic cats. Cambridge University Press 2014-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4473156/ /pubmed/26101591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2014.21 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
spellingShingle WALTHAM Supplement
Kerr, K. R.
Dowd, S. E.
Swanson, K. S.
Faecal microbiota of domestic cats fed raw whole chicks v. an extruded chicken-based diet
title Faecal microbiota of domestic cats fed raw whole chicks v. an extruded chicken-based diet
title_full Faecal microbiota of domestic cats fed raw whole chicks v. an extruded chicken-based diet
title_fullStr Faecal microbiota of domestic cats fed raw whole chicks v. an extruded chicken-based diet
title_full_unstemmed Faecal microbiota of domestic cats fed raw whole chicks v. an extruded chicken-based diet
title_short Faecal microbiota of domestic cats fed raw whole chicks v. an extruded chicken-based diet
title_sort faecal microbiota of domestic cats fed raw whole chicks v. an extruded chicken-based diet
topic WALTHAM Supplement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4473156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26101591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jns.2014.21
work_keys_str_mv AT kerrkr faecalmicrobiotaofdomesticcatsfedrawwholechicksvanextrudedchickenbaseddiet
AT dowdse faecalmicrobiotaofdomesticcatsfedrawwholechicksvanextrudedchickenbaseddiet
AT swansonks faecalmicrobiotaofdomesticcatsfedrawwholechicksvanextrudedchickenbaseddiet