Cargando…

Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in (123)I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism

Intensity normalization is an important pre-processing step in the study and analysis of DaTSCAN SPECT imaging. As most automatic supervised image segmentation and classification methods base their assumptions regarding the intensity distributions on a standardized intensity range, intensity normali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brahim, A., Ramírez, J., Górriz, J. M., Khedher, L., Salas-Gonzalez, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4473267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26086379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130274
_version_ 1782377204711161856
author Brahim, A.
Ramírez, J.
Górriz, J. M.
Khedher, L.
Salas-Gonzalez, D.
author_facet Brahim, A.
Ramírez, J.
Górriz, J. M.
Khedher, L.
Salas-Gonzalez, D.
author_sort Brahim, A.
collection PubMed
description Intensity normalization is an important pre-processing step in the study and analysis of DaTSCAN SPECT imaging. As most automatic supervised image segmentation and classification methods base their assumptions regarding the intensity distributions on a standardized intensity range, intensity normalization takes on a very significant role. In this work, a comparison between different novel intensity normalization methods is presented. These proposed methodologies are based on Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) image filtering and mean-squared error (MSE) optimization. The GMM-based image filtering method is achieved according to a probability threshold that removes the clusters whose likelihood are negligible in the non-specific regions. The MSE optimization method consists of a linear transformation that is obtained by minimizing the MSE in the non-specific region between the intensity normalized image and the template. The proposed intensity normalization methods are compared to: i) a standard approach based on the specific-to-non-specific binding ratio that is widely used, and ii) a linear approach based on the α-stable distribution. This comparison is performed on a DaTSCAN image database comprising analysis and classification stages for the development of a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system for Parkinsonian syndrome (PS) detection. In addition, these proposed methods correct spatially varying artifacts that modulate the intensity of the images. Finally, using the leave-one-out cross-validation technique over these two approaches, the system achieves results up to a 92.91% of accuracy, 94.64% of sensitivity and 92.65 % of specificity, outperforming previous approaches based on a standard and a linear approach, which are used as a reference. The use of advanced intensity normalization techniques, such as the GMM-based image filtering and the MSE optimization improves the diagnosis of PS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4473267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44732672015-06-29 Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in (123)I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism Brahim, A. Ramírez, J. Górriz, J. M. Khedher, L. Salas-Gonzalez, D. PLoS One Research Article Intensity normalization is an important pre-processing step in the study and analysis of DaTSCAN SPECT imaging. As most automatic supervised image segmentation and classification methods base their assumptions regarding the intensity distributions on a standardized intensity range, intensity normalization takes on a very significant role. In this work, a comparison between different novel intensity normalization methods is presented. These proposed methodologies are based on Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) image filtering and mean-squared error (MSE) optimization. The GMM-based image filtering method is achieved according to a probability threshold that removes the clusters whose likelihood are negligible in the non-specific regions. The MSE optimization method consists of a linear transformation that is obtained by minimizing the MSE in the non-specific region between the intensity normalized image and the template. The proposed intensity normalization methods are compared to: i) a standard approach based on the specific-to-non-specific binding ratio that is widely used, and ii) a linear approach based on the α-stable distribution. This comparison is performed on a DaTSCAN image database comprising analysis and classification stages for the development of a computer aided diagnosis (CAD) system for Parkinsonian syndrome (PS) detection. In addition, these proposed methods correct spatially varying artifacts that modulate the intensity of the images. Finally, using the leave-one-out cross-validation technique over these two approaches, the system achieves results up to a 92.91% of accuracy, 94.64% of sensitivity and 92.65 % of specificity, outperforming previous approaches based on a standard and a linear approach, which are used as a reference. The use of advanced intensity normalization techniques, such as the GMM-based image filtering and the MSE optimization improves the diagnosis of PS. Public Library of Science 2015-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4473267/ /pubmed/26086379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130274 Text en © 2015 Brahim et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Brahim, A.
Ramírez, J.
Górriz, J. M.
Khedher, L.
Salas-Gonzalez, D.
Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in (123)I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism
title Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in (123)I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism
title_full Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in (123)I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism
title_fullStr Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in (123)I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in (123)I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism
title_short Comparison between Different Intensity Normalization Methods in (123)I-Ioflupane Imaging for the Automatic Detection of Parkinsonism
title_sort comparison between different intensity normalization methods in (123)i-ioflupane imaging for the automatic detection of parkinsonism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4473267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26086379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130274
work_keys_str_mv AT brahima comparisonbetweendifferentintensitynormalizationmethodsin123iioflupaneimagingfortheautomaticdetectionofparkinsonism
AT ramirezj comparisonbetweendifferentintensitynormalizationmethodsin123iioflupaneimagingfortheautomaticdetectionofparkinsonism
AT gorrizjm comparisonbetweendifferentintensitynormalizationmethodsin123iioflupaneimagingfortheautomaticdetectionofparkinsonism
AT khedherl comparisonbetweendifferentintensitynormalizationmethodsin123iioflupaneimagingfortheautomaticdetectionofparkinsonism
AT salasgonzalezd comparisonbetweendifferentintensitynormalizationmethodsin123iioflupaneimagingfortheautomaticdetectionofparkinsonism