Cargando…

Association of TCF4 polymorphisms and fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the associations between transcription factor 4 (TCF4) genetic polymorphisms and Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy (FED) have reported controversial results. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to clarify the effects of TCF4 polymorphisms on FED risk. METHODS: A meta-anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Dan, Peng, XiaoYan, Sun, HuiYu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4474332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26087656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0055-6
_version_ 1782377255214776320
author Li, Dan
Peng, XiaoYan
Sun, HuiYu
author_facet Li, Dan
Peng, XiaoYan
Sun, HuiYu
author_sort Li, Dan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the associations between transcription factor 4 (TCF4) genetic polymorphisms and Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy (FED) have reported controversial results. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to clarify the effects of TCF4 polymorphisms on FED risk. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) inTCF4 and the risk of FED. Relevant studies were selected through an extensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science databases. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that there was a strong positive association between the TCF4 rs613872 polymorphism and FED risk in all the genetic models tested (G allele vs. T allele: OR = 4.19, 95 % CI = 3.53–4.97; GG vs. GT/TT: OR = 4.27, 95 % CI = 2.54–7.19; GG/GT vs. TT: OR = 6.29, 95 % CI = 4.23–8.93; GG VS. TT: OR = 10.64, 95 % CI = 5.28–21.41; GT VS. TT: OR = 6.08, 95 % CI = 4.28–8.64). Statistic evidence was also detected for a significant association between three other SNPs and the risk of FED. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested a genetic association between four TCF4 polymorphisms (rs613872, rs2286812, rs17595731, and rs9954153) and the risk of FED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4474332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44743322015-06-20 Association of TCF4 polymorphisms and fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: a meta-analysis Li, Dan Peng, XiaoYan Sun, HuiYu BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the associations between transcription factor 4 (TCF4) genetic polymorphisms and Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy (FED) have reported controversial results. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to clarify the effects of TCF4 polymorphisms on FED risk. METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) inTCF4 and the risk of FED. Relevant studies were selected through an extensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science databases. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that there was a strong positive association between the TCF4 rs613872 polymorphism and FED risk in all the genetic models tested (G allele vs. T allele: OR = 4.19, 95 % CI = 3.53–4.97; GG vs. GT/TT: OR = 4.27, 95 % CI = 2.54–7.19; GG/GT vs. TT: OR = 6.29, 95 % CI = 4.23–8.93; GG VS. TT: OR = 10.64, 95 % CI = 5.28–21.41; GT VS. TT: OR = 6.08, 95 % CI = 4.28–8.64). Statistic evidence was also detected for a significant association between three other SNPs and the risk of FED. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested a genetic association between four TCF4 polymorphisms (rs613872, rs2286812, rs17595731, and rs9954153) and the risk of FED. BioMed Central 2015-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4474332/ /pubmed/26087656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0055-6 Text en © Li et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Dan
Peng, XiaoYan
Sun, HuiYu
Association of TCF4 polymorphisms and fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: a meta-analysis
title Association of TCF4 polymorphisms and fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: a meta-analysis
title_full Association of TCF4 polymorphisms and fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Association of TCF4 polymorphisms and fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association of TCF4 polymorphisms and fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: a meta-analysis
title_short Association of TCF4 polymorphisms and fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: a meta-analysis
title_sort association of tcf4 polymorphisms and fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4474332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26087656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0055-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lidan associationoftcf4polymorphismsandfuchsendothelialdystrophyametaanalysis
AT pengxiaoyan associationoftcf4polymorphismsandfuchsendothelialdystrophyametaanalysis
AT sunhuiyu associationoftcf4polymorphismsandfuchsendothelialdystrophyametaanalysis