Cargando…
Skin decontamination in critically ill patients. Comparison of two daily bathing methods: traditional bath versus 2% chlorexidine gluconate (CHG) cloths
Autores principales: | Tura, G, Marcatelli, N, Leardini, P |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475222/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-4-S1-P239 |
Ejemplares similares
-
895. Impact of Measurement and Results Feedback of Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentrations in Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Patients Receiving CHG Bathing
por: Rhee, Yoona, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
273. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Bathing in Nursing Homes (NHs) and Hospitals: Impact on the Nose & Skin Microbiome and Multidrug Resistant Organism (MDRO) Prevalence
por: Gussin, Gabrielle, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Economic impact of Tegaderm chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) dressing in critically ill patients
por: Thokala, Praveen, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
897. Prevalence of Candida auris at Body Sites, Characterization of Skin Microbiota, and Relation of Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentration to C. auris Detection Among Patients at a High-Prevalence Ventilator-Capable Skilled Nursing Facility (vSNF) with Established CHG Bathing
por: Hayden, Mary K, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Indwelling medical devices and skin microorganisms on ICU patients bathed with chlorhexidine gluconate
por: Rhee, Yoona, et al.
Publicado: (2022)