Cargando…

Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation

The relative impact of 23 mutations on biofilm formation was evaluated in the USA300, methicillin-resistant strain LAC. Mutation of sarA, atl, codY, rsbU, and sigB limited biofilm formation in comparison to the parent strain, but the limitation imposed by mutation of sarA was greater than that impos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atwood, Danielle N, Loughran, Allister J, Courtney, Ashleah P, Anthony, Allison C, Meeker, Daniel G, Spencer, Horace J, Gupta, Ravi Kr, Lee, Chia Y, Beenken, Karen E, Smeltzer, Mark S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.250
_version_ 1782377459084165120
author Atwood, Danielle N
Loughran, Allister J
Courtney, Ashleah P
Anthony, Allison C
Meeker, Daniel G
Spencer, Horace J
Gupta, Ravi Kr
Lee, Chia Y
Beenken, Karen E
Smeltzer, Mark S
author_facet Atwood, Danielle N
Loughran, Allister J
Courtney, Ashleah P
Anthony, Allison C
Meeker, Daniel G
Spencer, Horace J
Gupta, Ravi Kr
Lee, Chia Y
Beenken, Karen E
Smeltzer, Mark S
author_sort Atwood, Danielle N
collection PubMed
description The relative impact of 23 mutations on biofilm formation was evaluated in the USA300, methicillin-resistant strain LAC. Mutation of sarA, atl, codY, rsbU, and sigB limited biofilm formation in comparison to the parent strain, but the limitation imposed by mutation of sarA was greater than that imposed by mutation of any of these other genes. The reduced biofilm formation of all mutants other than the atl mutant was correlated with increased levels of extracellular proteases. Mutation of fur- and mgrA-enhanced biofilm formation but in LAC had no impact on protease activity, nuclease activity, or accumulation of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA). The increased capacity of these mutants to form a biofilm was reversed by mutation of sarA, and this was correlated with increased protease production. Mutation of sarA, mgrA, and sigB had the same phenotypic effect in the methicillin-sensitive strain UAMS-1, but mutation of codY increased rather than decreased biofilm formation. As with the UAMS-1 mgrA mutant, this was correlated with increased production of PIA. Examination of four additional clinical isolates suggests that the differential impact of codY on biofilm formation may be a conserved characteristic of methicillin-resistant versus methicillin-sensitive strains.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4475386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44753862015-06-26 Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation Atwood, Danielle N Loughran, Allister J Courtney, Ashleah P Anthony, Allison C Meeker, Daniel G Spencer, Horace J Gupta, Ravi Kr Lee, Chia Y Beenken, Karen E Smeltzer, Mark S Microbiologyopen Original Research The relative impact of 23 mutations on biofilm formation was evaluated in the USA300, methicillin-resistant strain LAC. Mutation of sarA, atl, codY, rsbU, and sigB limited biofilm formation in comparison to the parent strain, but the limitation imposed by mutation of sarA was greater than that imposed by mutation of any of these other genes. The reduced biofilm formation of all mutants other than the atl mutant was correlated with increased levels of extracellular proteases. Mutation of fur- and mgrA-enhanced biofilm formation but in LAC had no impact on protease activity, nuclease activity, or accumulation of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA). The increased capacity of these mutants to form a biofilm was reversed by mutation of sarA, and this was correlated with increased protease production. Mutation of sarA, mgrA, and sigB had the same phenotypic effect in the methicillin-sensitive strain UAMS-1, but mutation of codY increased rather than decreased biofilm formation. As with the UAMS-1 mgrA mutant, this was correlated with increased production of PIA. Examination of four additional clinical isolates suggests that the differential impact of codY on biofilm formation may be a conserved characteristic of methicillin-resistant versus methicillin-sensitive strains. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-06 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4475386/ /pubmed/25810138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.250 Text en © 2015 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Atwood, Danielle N
Loughran, Allister J
Courtney, Ashleah P
Anthony, Allison C
Meeker, Daniel G
Spencer, Horace J
Gupta, Ravi Kr
Lee, Chia Y
Beenken, Karen E
Smeltzer, Mark S
Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation
title Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation
title_full Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation
title_fullStr Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation
title_short Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation
title_sort comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.250
work_keys_str_mv AT atwooddaniellen comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation
AT loughranallisterj comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation
AT courtneyashleahp comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation
AT anthonyallisonc comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation
AT meekerdanielg comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation
AT spencerhoracej comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation
AT guptaravikr comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation
AT leechiay comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation
AT beenkenkarene comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation
AT smeltzermarks comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation