Cargando…
Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation
The relative impact of 23 mutations on biofilm formation was evaluated in the USA300, methicillin-resistant strain LAC. Mutation of sarA, atl, codY, rsbU, and sigB limited biofilm formation in comparison to the parent strain, but the limitation imposed by mutation of sarA was greater than that impos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.250 |
_version_ | 1782377459084165120 |
---|---|
author | Atwood, Danielle N Loughran, Allister J Courtney, Ashleah P Anthony, Allison C Meeker, Daniel G Spencer, Horace J Gupta, Ravi Kr Lee, Chia Y Beenken, Karen E Smeltzer, Mark S |
author_facet | Atwood, Danielle N Loughran, Allister J Courtney, Ashleah P Anthony, Allison C Meeker, Daniel G Spencer, Horace J Gupta, Ravi Kr Lee, Chia Y Beenken, Karen E Smeltzer, Mark S |
author_sort | Atwood, Danielle N |
collection | PubMed |
description | The relative impact of 23 mutations on biofilm formation was evaluated in the USA300, methicillin-resistant strain LAC. Mutation of sarA, atl, codY, rsbU, and sigB limited biofilm formation in comparison to the parent strain, but the limitation imposed by mutation of sarA was greater than that imposed by mutation of any of these other genes. The reduced biofilm formation of all mutants other than the atl mutant was correlated with increased levels of extracellular proteases. Mutation of fur- and mgrA-enhanced biofilm formation but in LAC had no impact on protease activity, nuclease activity, or accumulation of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA). The increased capacity of these mutants to form a biofilm was reversed by mutation of sarA, and this was correlated with increased protease production. Mutation of sarA, mgrA, and sigB had the same phenotypic effect in the methicillin-sensitive strain UAMS-1, but mutation of codY increased rather than decreased biofilm formation. As with the UAMS-1 mgrA mutant, this was correlated with increased production of PIA. Examination of four additional clinical isolates suggests that the differential impact of codY on biofilm formation may be a conserved characteristic of methicillin-resistant versus methicillin-sensitive strains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4475386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44753862015-06-26 Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation Atwood, Danielle N Loughran, Allister J Courtney, Ashleah P Anthony, Allison C Meeker, Daniel G Spencer, Horace J Gupta, Ravi Kr Lee, Chia Y Beenken, Karen E Smeltzer, Mark S Microbiologyopen Original Research The relative impact of 23 mutations on biofilm formation was evaluated in the USA300, methicillin-resistant strain LAC. Mutation of sarA, atl, codY, rsbU, and sigB limited biofilm formation in comparison to the parent strain, but the limitation imposed by mutation of sarA was greater than that imposed by mutation of any of these other genes. The reduced biofilm formation of all mutants other than the atl mutant was correlated with increased levels of extracellular proteases. Mutation of fur- and mgrA-enhanced biofilm formation but in LAC had no impact on protease activity, nuclease activity, or accumulation of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA). The increased capacity of these mutants to form a biofilm was reversed by mutation of sarA, and this was correlated with increased protease production. Mutation of sarA, mgrA, and sigB had the same phenotypic effect in the methicillin-sensitive strain UAMS-1, but mutation of codY increased rather than decreased biofilm formation. As with the UAMS-1 mgrA mutant, this was correlated with increased production of PIA. Examination of four additional clinical isolates suggests that the differential impact of codY on biofilm formation may be a conserved characteristic of methicillin-resistant versus methicillin-sensitive strains. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-06 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4475386/ /pubmed/25810138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.250 Text en © 2015 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Atwood, Danielle N Loughran, Allister J Courtney, Ashleah P Anthony, Allison C Meeker, Daniel G Spencer, Horace J Gupta, Ravi Kr Lee, Chia Y Beenken, Karen E Smeltzer, Mark S Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation |
title | Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation |
title_full | Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation |
title_fullStr | Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation |
title_short | Comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation |
title_sort | comparative impact of diverse regulatory loci on staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25810138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atwooddaniellen comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation AT loughranallisterj comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation AT courtneyashleahp comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation AT anthonyallisonc comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation AT meekerdanielg comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation AT spencerhoracej comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation AT guptaravikr comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation AT leechiay comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation AT beenkenkarene comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation AT smeltzermarks comparativeimpactofdiverseregulatorylocionstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmformation |