Cargando…
Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study
The metabo-ring initiative brought together five nuclear magnetic resonance instruments (NMR) and 11 different mass spectrometers with the objective of assessing the reliability of untargeted metabolomics approaches in obtaining comparable metabolomics profiles. This was estimated by measuring the p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-014-0740-0 |
_version_ | 1782377468905127936 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Jean-Charles Maillot, Matthieu Mazerolles, Gérard Verdu, Alexandre Lyan, Bernard Migné, Carole Defoort, Catherine Canlet, Cecile Junot, Christophe Guillou, Claude Manach, Claudine Jabob, Daniel Bouveresse, Delphine Jouan-Rimbaud Paris, Estelle Pujos-Guillot, Estelle Jourdan, Fabien Giacomoni, Franck Courant, Frédérique Favé, Gaëlle Le Gall, Gwenaëlle Chassaigne, Hubert Tabet, Jean-Claude Martin, Jean-Francois Antignac, Jean-Philippe Shintu, Laetitia Defernez, Marianne Philo, Mark Alexandre-Gouaubau, Marie-Cécile Amiot-Carlin, Marie-Josephe Bossis, Mathilde Triba, Mohamed N. Stojilkovic, Natali Banzet, Nathalie Molinié, Roland Bott, Romain Goulitquer, Sophie Caldarelli, Stefano Rutledge, Douglas N. |
author_facet | Martin, Jean-Charles Maillot, Matthieu Mazerolles, Gérard Verdu, Alexandre Lyan, Bernard Migné, Carole Defoort, Catherine Canlet, Cecile Junot, Christophe Guillou, Claude Manach, Claudine Jabob, Daniel Bouveresse, Delphine Jouan-Rimbaud Paris, Estelle Pujos-Guillot, Estelle Jourdan, Fabien Giacomoni, Franck Courant, Frédérique Favé, Gaëlle Le Gall, Gwenaëlle Chassaigne, Hubert Tabet, Jean-Claude Martin, Jean-Francois Antignac, Jean-Philippe Shintu, Laetitia Defernez, Marianne Philo, Mark Alexandre-Gouaubau, Marie-Cécile Amiot-Carlin, Marie-Josephe Bossis, Mathilde Triba, Mohamed N. Stojilkovic, Natali Banzet, Nathalie Molinié, Roland Bott, Romain Goulitquer, Sophie Caldarelli, Stefano Rutledge, Douglas N. |
author_sort | Martin, Jean-Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | The metabo-ring initiative brought together five nuclear magnetic resonance instruments (NMR) and 11 different mass spectrometers with the objective of assessing the reliability of untargeted metabolomics approaches in obtaining comparable metabolomics profiles. This was estimated by measuring the proportion of common spectral information extracted from the different LCMS and NMR platforms. Biological samples obtained from 2 different conditions were analysed by the partners using their own in-house protocols. Test #1 examined urine samples from adult volunteers either spiked or not spiked with 32 metabolite standards. Test #2 involved a low biological contrast situation comparing the plasma of rats fed a diet either supplemented or not with vitamin D. The spectral information from each instrument was assembled into separate statistical blocks. Correlations between blocks (e.g., instruments) were examined (RV coefficients) along with the structure of the common spectral information (common components and specific weights analysis). In addition, in Test #1, an outlier individual was blindly introduced, and its identification by the various platforms was evaluated. Despite large differences in the number of spectral features produced after post-processing and the heterogeneity of the analytical conditions and the data treatment, the spectral information both within (NMR and LCMS) and across methods (NMR vs. LCMS) was highly convergent (from 64 to 91 % on average). No effect of the LCMS instrumentation (TOF, QTOF, LTQ-Orbitrap) was noted. The outlier individual was best detected and characterised by LCMS instruments. In conclusion, untargeted metabolomics analyses report consistent information within and across instruments of various technologies, even without prior standardisation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11306-014-0740-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4475541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44755412015-06-22 Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study Martin, Jean-Charles Maillot, Matthieu Mazerolles, Gérard Verdu, Alexandre Lyan, Bernard Migné, Carole Defoort, Catherine Canlet, Cecile Junot, Christophe Guillou, Claude Manach, Claudine Jabob, Daniel Bouveresse, Delphine Jouan-Rimbaud Paris, Estelle Pujos-Guillot, Estelle Jourdan, Fabien Giacomoni, Franck Courant, Frédérique Favé, Gaëlle Le Gall, Gwenaëlle Chassaigne, Hubert Tabet, Jean-Claude Martin, Jean-Francois Antignac, Jean-Philippe Shintu, Laetitia Defernez, Marianne Philo, Mark Alexandre-Gouaubau, Marie-Cécile Amiot-Carlin, Marie-Josephe Bossis, Mathilde Triba, Mohamed N. Stojilkovic, Natali Banzet, Nathalie Molinié, Roland Bott, Romain Goulitquer, Sophie Caldarelli, Stefano Rutledge, Douglas N. Metabolomics Original Article The metabo-ring initiative brought together five nuclear magnetic resonance instruments (NMR) and 11 different mass spectrometers with the objective of assessing the reliability of untargeted metabolomics approaches in obtaining comparable metabolomics profiles. This was estimated by measuring the proportion of common spectral information extracted from the different LCMS and NMR platforms. Biological samples obtained from 2 different conditions were analysed by the partners using their own in-house protocols. Test #1 examined urine samples from adult volunteers either spiked or not spiked with 32 metabolite standards. Test #2 involved a low biological contrast situation comparing the plasma of rats fed a diet either supplemented or not with vitamin D. The spectral information from each instrument was assembled into separate statistical blocks. Correlations between blocks (e.g., instruments) were examined (RV coefficients) along with the structure of the common spectral information (common components and specific weights analysis). In addition, in Test #1, an outlier individual was blindly introduced, and its identification by the various platforms was evaluated. Despite large differences in the number of spectral features produced after post-processing and the heterogeneity of the analytical conditions and the data treatment, the spectral information both within (NMR and LCMS) and across methods (NMR vs. LCMS) was highly convergent (from 64 to 91 % on average). No effect of the LCMS instrumentation (TOF, QTOF, LTQ-Orbitrap) was noted. The outlier individual was best detected and characterised by LCMS instruments. In conclusion, untargeted metabolomics analyses report consistent information within and across instruments of various technologies, even without prior standardisation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11306-014-0740-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2014-10-14 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4475541/ /pubmed/26109925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-014-0740-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Martin, Jean-Charles Maillot, Matthieu Mazerolles, Gérard Verdu, Alexandre Lyan, Bernard Migné, Carole Defoort, Catherine Canlet, Cecile Junot, Christophe Guillou, Claude Manach, Claudine Jabob, Daniel Bouveresse, Delphine Jouan-Rimbaud Paris, Estelle Pujos-Guillot, Estelle Jourdan, Fabien Giacomoni, Franck Courant, Frédérique Favé, Gaëlle Le Gall, Gwenaëlle Chassaigne, Hubert Tabet, Jean-Claude Martin, Jean-Francois Antignac, Jean-Philippe Shintu, Laetitia Defernez, Marianne Philo, Mark Alexandre-Gouaubau, Marie-Cécile Amiot-Carlin, Marie-Josephe Bossis, Mathilde Triba, Mohamed N. Stojilkovic, Natali Banzet, Nathalie Molinié, Roland Bott, Romain Goulitquer, Sophie Caldarelli, Stefano Rutledge, Douglas N. Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study |
title | Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study |
title_full | Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study |
title_fullStr | Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study |
title_full_unstemmed | Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study |
title_short | Can we trust untargeted metabolomics? Results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study |
title_sort | can we trust untargeted metabolomics? results of the metabo-ring initiative, a large-scale, multi-instrument inter-laboratory study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11306-014-0740-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinjeancharles canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT maillotmatthieu canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT mazerollesgerard canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT verdualexandre canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT lyanbernard canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT mignecarole canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT defoortcatherine canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT canletcecile canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT junotchristophe canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT guillouclaude canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT manachclaudine canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT jabobdaniel canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT bouveressedelphinejouanrimbaud canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT parisestelle canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT pujosguillotestelle canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT jourdanfabien canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT giacomonifranck canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT courantfrederique canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT favegaelle canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT legallgwenaelle canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT chassaignehubert canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT tabetjeanclaude canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT martinjeanfrancois canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT antignacjeanphilippe canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT shintulaetitia canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT defernezmarianne canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT philomark canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT alexandregouaubaumariececile canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT amiotcarlinmariejosephe canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT bossismathilde canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT tribamohamedn canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT stojilkovicnatali canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT banzetnathalie canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT molinieroland canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT bottromain canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT goulitquersophie canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT caldarellistefano canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy AT rutledgedouglasn canwetrustuntargetedmetabolomicsresultsofthemetaboringinitiativealargescalemultiinstrumentinterlaboratorystudy |