Cargando…

Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been regarded a general contraindication in patients with cardiovascular implanted electronic devices such as cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) due to the risk of severe complications and even deaths caused by interactions of the magne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nordbeck, Peter, Ertl, Georg, Ritter, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25796053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv086
_version_ 1782377476003987456
author Nordbeck, Peter
Ertl, Georg
Ritter, Oliver
author_facet Nordbeck, Peter
Ertl, Georg
Ritter, Oliver
author_sort Nordbeck, Peter
collection PubMed
description Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been regarded a general contraindication in patients with cardiovascular implanted electronic devices such as cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) due to the risk of severe complications and even deaths caused by interactions of the magnetic resonance (MR) surrounding and the electric devices. Over the last decade, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for such potentially life-threatening complications as well as technical advances have allowed an increasing number of pacemaker and ICD patients to safely undergo MRI. This review lists the key findings from basic research and clinical trials over the last 20 years, and discusses the impact on current day clinical practice. With ‘MR-conditional’ devices being the new standard of care, MRI in pacemaker and ICD patients has been adopted to clinical routine today. However, specific precautions and specifications of these devices should be carefully followed if possible, to avoid patient risks which might appear with new MR technology and further increasing indications and patient numbers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4475571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44755712015-07-13 Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come? Nordbeck, Peter Ertl, Georg Ritter, Oliver Eur Heart J Reviews Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been regarded a general contraindication in patients with cardiovascular implanted electronic devices such as cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) due to the risk of severe complications and even deaths caused by interactions of the magnetic resonance (MR) surrounding and the electric devices. Over the last decade, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for such potentially life-threatening complications as well as technical advances have allowed an increasing number of pacemaker and ICD patients to safely undergo MRI. This review lists the key findings from basic research and clinical trials over the last 20 years, and discusses the impact on current day clinical practice. With ‘MR-conditional’ devices being the new standard of care, MRI in pacemaker and ICD patients has been adopted to clinical routine today. However, specific precautions and specifications of these devices should be carefully followed if possible, to avoid patient risks which might appear with new MR technology and further increasing indications and patient numbers. Oxford University Press 2015-06-21 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4475571/ /pubmed/25796053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv086 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Reviews
Nordbeck, Peter
Ertl, Georg
Ritter, Oliver
Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?
title Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?
title_full Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?
title_fullStr Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?
title_short Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25796053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv086
work_keys_str_mv AT nordbeckpeter magneticresonanceimagingsafetyinpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatientshowfarhavewecome
AT ertlgeorg magneticresonanceimagingsafetyinpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatientshowfarhavewecome
AT ritteroliver magneticresonanceimagingsafetyinpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatientshowfarhavewecome