Cargando…
Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been regarded a general contraindication in patients with cardiovascular implanted electronic devices such as cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) due to the risk of severe complications and even deaths caused by interactions of the magne...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25796053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv086 |
_version_ | 1782377476003987456 |
---|---|
author | Nordbeck, Peter Ertl, Georg Ritter, Oliver |
author_facet | Nordbeck, Peter Ertl, Georg Ritter, Oliver |
author_sort | Nordbeck, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been regarded a general contraindication in patients with cardiovascular implanted electronic devices such as cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) due to the risk of severe complications and even deaths caused by interactions of the magnetic resonance (MR) surrounding and the electric devices. Over the last decade, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for such potentially life-threatening complications as well as technical advances have allowed an increasing number of pacemaker and ICD patients to safely undergo MRI. This review lists the key findings from basic research and clinical trials over the last 20 years, and discusses the impact on current day clinical practice. With ‘MR-conditional’ devices being the new standard of care, MRI in pacemaker and ICD patients has been adopted to clinical routine today. However, specific precautions and specifications of these devices should be carefully followed if possible, to avoid patient risks which might appear with new MR technology and further increasing indications and patient numbers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4475571 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44755712015-07-13 Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come? Nordbeck, Peter Ertl, Georg Ritter, Oliver Eur Heart J Reviews Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has long been regarded a general contraindication in patients with cardiovascular implanted electronic devices such as cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) due to the risk of severe complications and even deaths caused by interactions of the magnetic resonance (MR) surrounding and the electric devices. Over the last decade, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for such potentially life-threatening complications as well as technical advances have allowed an increasing number of pacemaker and ICD patients to safely undergo MRI. This review lists the key findings from basic research and clinical trials over the last 20 years, and discusses the impact on current day clinical practice. With ‘MR-conditional’ devices being the new standard of care, MRI in pacemaker and ICD patients has been adopted to clinical routine today. However, specific precautions and specifications of these devices should be carefully followed if possible, to avoid patient risks which might appear with new MR technology and further increasing indications and patient numbers. Oxford University Press 2015-06-21 2015-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4475571/ /pubmed/25796053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv086 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Reviews Nordbeck, Peter Ertl, Georg Ritter, Oliver Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come? |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come? |
title_full | Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come? |
title_fullStr | Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come? |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come? |
title_short | Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come? |
title_sort | magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come? |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4475571/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25796053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nordbeckpeter magneticresonanceimagingsafetyinpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatientshowfarhavewecome AT ertlgeorg magneticresonanceimagingsafetyinpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatientshowfarhavewecome AT ritteroliver magneticresonanceimagingsafetyinpacemakerandimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorpatientshowfarhavewecome |